Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. ZimZaxZeo
    3. Posts
    0%
    Z
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 9
    • Posts 236
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by ZimZaxZeo

    • RE: What is the best way to stop germany?

      “Major offensive” espcially “in all areas” has a great ring to it, but it will help defeat Soviet if the Russian ground forces are worn down in attacking and then in defending newly taken turf. Soviet player must exercise selective, opportunistic attacking where and when German player leaves units underprotected.

      The UK and US on the other hand, must do the major offensive at all costs. Of course, the UK’s offensive can only be “major” in the sense that it will consist of a whole bunch of minor attacks from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic and Baltic. The US must be the “blockader-in-chief” while UK must steadily build transports and keep at least one destroyer afloat to prepare for D-Day.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: Wich game is the best to begin playing with?

      There have been discussions about this on this site (just don’t recall which forum), with the most experienced players preferring A&A. Other comments I remember: that AAP makes for fast play, great sweeping maneuvers across the ocean… that AAE boils down to a slogging war of attrition between Germany & Russia (but with this you get a great feeling for the importance of coordinated maneuver, deployment and counterstrike).

      Personally I started with AAE – and I’m still with it! But I am looking forward to playing the A&A and AAP. In AAEurope, I have found enough complexity and variety to see that it gets more interesting all the time, like any good game. There are new strategies and tactics that each of the players can attempt and perfect. There are enough combinations of these, to keep the other side off balance and scrambling.

      Another thing I notice is that different players bring their own style to the game – and the game is better for it, another sign of great game design.
      Anyway, it seems to me that any of these three versions will be challenging, entertaining, and historically stimulating … if I had it to do over again, I might go with A&A first, because after all::::: it really was a WORLD war.

      posted in Player Help
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: Blitz to Caucausus?

      There are ways to reduce the effectiveness of enemy air power, and I agree one of them is to split the opponent’s forces, so that in any single territorial attack his air force is covered by fewer infantry.

      In some ways, the THREAT of blitzing Caucasus is worth more than actually doing it. Why? Because a credible threat means a strong German force in the Ukraine. Once established there, the German can choose between applying more force upon Belorussia, or wheeling around through Stalingrad and yes maybe the Caucasus at the same time. The Soviet player can’t easily predict which is going to happen, and will have to react. The German can plan to take full advantage, whatever the reaction.

      To the extent the Soviet uses air forces against German forces in Ukraine or Caucasus, it blunts his counterattack in the center. This is a key reward for the German flanking to the south: dispersing the Soviet air power.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: THE UNBEATABLE STRATEGY!

      Hey Thamor - -

      It is fun when playing Germany to make these attacks on many territories. Only problem is it means you are giving Soviet player opportunity to use more of his infantry at its maximum strength of “2” – in other words defending – and at the same time, you on the offensive are forced to shed your infantry, which is more limited in quantity and which you need to conserve for the final stages.

      As Germany, I like to keep eastern front attacks to a minimum, and to organize so that I have a 2-to-1 unit count in these attacks. I like to mass air so that I can win in one or two rounds of dicing. I am extremely reluctant to commit armor to attacks until the fight for Belorussia & Moscow. A disciplined Soviet player will have similar goals – not wasting infantry on counterattacks, but attacking only where the odds are completely advantageous. And holding back armor until the final stages.

      It is interesting to me that Mat’s strategy balances both of these choices. His German player stops attacking – even withdraws – rather than broaden the front (except for the Karelia feint). And his Soviet player can counterattack to take territory safely where the German reduces the defenders – but by doing this, the Soviet risks spreading his lines and weakening the central defense. I think Mat’s plan works for the German player because the Soviet has no business extending his front when it is so hard to reinforce! Even getting territory for FREE is a trap for the Russians!

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: THE UNBEATABLE STRATEGY!

      Hey, Mr. Mat – I played a test game wif dis strategy of yours.

      It seems you leave yourself open to major pressures from the Atlantic, since you don’t reinvest in subs or air power during the first three turns.

      However, Germany won – and convincingly!!

      Nevertheless, it is still worth considering these points:::::

      As you spend zero on air units, your airforce will almost certainly be degraded. Ironically, you are giving the Soviets just enough breathing room so that they can build up their airforce. How? By retreating in turn 2, you are giving Soviet more time and more land to use in defense! Thus he feels less pressed to spend all-out on infantry. And the additional fighters he can buy will make his counterattacks more flexible and potent.

      If I am Soviet, I will in turn 1 build Karelia infantry up to about 8 units – and I will move the antiaircraft gun from Archangel into Karelia. This has a good chance to take down at least one of the likely 3 or 4 fighters you send against me.

      As Soviet, I see you are swelling up all forces into Germany as a mighty stack. Why then would I be pulled into Poland, stretching out my forces so that you can take them, one bite at a time? I smell the trap too easily. But do I have any alternative? Well, since you are evacuating your forward positions, I may spend a couple of infantry to occupy them, thanks! But only just the minimum. This takes a bit of pressure off my IPC count, too.

      My success at stalling out your Karelian advance – or even retaking Karelia in turn 2 – means that I don’t really have much to worry about on the flanks. You, the German, will have spent all your forces in the north by the start of turn 3. Meanwhile in the south, you have withdrawn or stayed silent, keeping the pressure soft on Ukraine.

      The sum: when, in turn 3, you unleash the mighty ground stack into Poland, I don’t lose much material. Instead, I continue to build toward the Belorussian defense – where the fight will not come until turn 5. Even if you succeed, and smash into Moscow by turn 6, the UK & US have near-total command of the sea, which permits them to test your Fortress Europe defenses starting as early as turn 4, and Germany itself by turn 5.

      In the test game I played, Germany was indeed able to muster sufficient ground and air units to hold Germany and retake BEL-NETH. In fact, looked like the Germans could hold off indefinitely. Don’t know if better administration and a bit luckier dicing could have turned the tide for US/UK.

      On the Russian front, at any rate, your strategy seems to have real power.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: I Need Info For Magazine article

      Of course! Guess I was up past my bedtime.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: Marriage/Kids

      Sheesh! Whether for love, for desperation, or for anything else, it’s fine to have kids. And nobody knows – nobody – where the next Einstein will be born, nor to whom.

      Shall we look at a new person in the world as a liability, or as a potential boon to all?

      Just food for thought… and come to think of it, any immigrant who is actually sending hard-earned pay home to the wife and kids sounds like a pretty responsible type!

      posted in General Discussion
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: I Need Info For Magazine article

      errrr… .hm?

      If there are two players, one plays all 3 Allies, right?

      Well, it’s y o u r magazine article!

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: THE UNBEATABLE STRATEGY!

      Regarding Dzertfish’s post above, you might also get some good discussion going by highlighting Sea Lion: the invasion of UK. Really super tough to pull off; there are some posts about it way back from early 2002, like page 10 or 11 in the Europe forum here, but none of them seem to give much hope for Germany taking UK. It would seem that EVERYTHING has to go just right, including heavy good luck in dice.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: What is the best way to stop germany?

      Definitely send any & all Allied fighters to the defense of Mother Russia! Maybe even a bomber. These units can inflict damage on German forces by strafing (one round of attack covered by ground units, then retreat) - - and they are expensive for the Germans to destroy! Of course, the major order of the day is to use those valiant infantry for defense, defense, defense. I like to hold back the Red armor until after Germany commits a huge bunch of its own tanks first: Tigers make juicy targets.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: Marriage/Kids

      Marriage is about two things, I’d say: (1) complete dedication to your best and leading partner in life, in other words mutual fulfillment of each of your highest aspirations, talents, traits & ideals – and (2) raising kids – and NOT necessarily in that order!!!

      In other words, if you can make it together through all the trials & tribulations that go with the rewards of child-rearing, then everybody will benefit: the kids, and each of you.

      The really important thing is to ask yourself: What DONT I like about my partner to be? And what do I plan to do about it? I think the answer oughta be, roughly: put up with it!! In other words, realize that you guys really are not going to change one another fundamentally. You will grow, certainly, and mature, etc. – but who you is is who you gonna turn out to be, pretty much.

      As for some magic age, well, once you are in your early 20s, all bets are off and you might as well get on with it!! In the meantime it is nice to be free enough to travel the world, etc., which is much more challenging with infants & toddlers in tow, see!

      Enjoy!

      posted in General Discussion
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: Blitz to Caucausus?

      One way to consider the Caucasus as the German player is that by extending yourself to take it, you are outflanking yourself!!

      I mean, in the classic Soviet defense, all forces are called toward Belorussia and adjoining support areas, to keep the Germans at least two territories away from Moscow, as long as possible. Now, the German answer to this must be to pressure Belorussia with maximum force as available.

      If you as the German player take Ukraine – and retake it – well, you are spending well over 4 IPCs per turn to do so. Figure the Soviets will withdraw from Caucasus anyway by turn 4 at the latest, assuming you are doing all right in the center and north. So why spend infantry (and armor & air power) on assaulting this flank zone, when the same infantry can be used to greater effect in resisting the Soviet counterattacks? I say concentrate on holding the Ukraine with maximum forces against the Belorussian flank, rather than spending them on the admittedly juicy Caucausus region. You’ll soon get it for “free,” regardless!

      The “other hand” in this case would, I suppose, be that by taking Caucasus with a small but credible force by turn 2 or 3, you may coax the Soviet player into sending some of his own dwindling forces there to retake. Even if he is successful, and eradicates some of your armor & infantry there, such a development may draw down the defensive strength of the Moscow-Belorussia salient. Good for Germany!

      Forsooth, much of the decision-making may derive from the luck of the dicerolls in your invasion of Ukraine in the first place!!

      What we know from history is… what? Hitler started Operation Barbarossa at least a month late, he ordered major thrusts toward the Caucasus in desperation, out of fear of running short of oil, and… the offensive in the center was blunted by good ol’ Zukhov & friends. Some historians figure that was it: the Nazis lost the war in 1941, followed by four more years of global carnage to certify the outcome.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: I Need Info For Magazine article

      Hi Xi,
      Let’s just say I have been intrigued in romance, and distracted by the real-life warring… anyhoo, I am thinking about playing some A&AE games via email, so thought I’d tune in again…!

      Howz thangs been witchoo??

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: I Need Info For Magazine article

      Well, you need one more response category, I would suggest: Be Allies (all 3) and take Germany.

      Anyway, that option is fun, as it involves complex teamwork, not to mention heroic sacrifices on the parts of Soviet & Brit forces.

      On the other hand, it is so damn fun being the Germans against “ze Welt” that it’s hard to resist. And in this case, I aim to take Moscow.

      Cheers = ZimZaxZeo
      (p.s. what magazine??)

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: Where are your ancestors from?

      @StrongBad1988:

      all of mine (great grandpareents) were immigrants too except for the one descedened from the guy that came over on the ship with the mayflower

      Dude: those Pilgrim folks on the Mayflower and the other ships were all immigrants! Just earlier immigrants. What do you prefer to call them, colonists? Maybe that leads to interesting distinctions – explorers, colonists, settlers, immigrants. To the native nose, maybe they all had a similar scent… although some, like the fur trappers, had a way of blending in better.

      posted in General Discussion
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: Where are your ancestors from?

      East of the Sun,
      West of the Moon,
      East of the Sun,
      West of the Moon,
      from out of the ooze in the mid-ocean trench,
      from the solar-deflected cosmic rays,
      soaked in blood, dusted in ash,
      caked with muck from the rotting forest floor,
      swept by crag-cracking arctic jet stream,
      cloned by radio waves, head stove in,
      lifted in an herb cloud, drenched in hops,
      stained by treachery, saved by friendship,
      on my last legs but still getting by…
      and one of them signed the Declaration of Independence –
      trusting that my kids will more than live up to their heritage,
      making their home on Planit Oit, spreading their vision
      up, out, deep beyond… my ancestors beat the drum,
      sang as they walked and worked, listened to the
      creatures and the plants under the sun,
      listened to the ocean sing,
      tinkered with machinery,
      and in their proudest moments
      passed along the ways to fight disease, hunger, ignorance…
      lounging around the fire

      posted in General Discussion
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: Reading list

      @TG:

      Bonfire Of The Vanities… hmmm… what’s it about? :)

      It’s about chasing money and status within the insanity of 1970s New York City – specifically the up-in-smoke South Bronx.

      BY THE WAY – for anyone interested in the actual in-war experience, from the infantryman’s point of view:::::

      Slaughterhouse Five – Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.: he lived it then wrote about it (WWII Europe)
      The Naked and the Dead – Norman Mailer: lived it then wrote about it (WWII Pacific)
      All Quiet on the Western Front – dont’ know the author but it is the German footsoldier’s view of WWI.

      posted in General Discussion
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: Favorite Band?

      @alamein:

      #1 the beatles
      #2 PINK FLOYDD
      #3 the doors
      #4 creedance clearwater revival or the cream

      I don’t like the angry pissed of rich as heck youth thing musics going thru right now. - what …. did I just offend some one else??? jeez.

      Nice sound track, alamein – how do you feel about Jim Morrison’s contemporary flat-out pals: Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin? Also, in case anybody made it alive into the 1980s:::::::
      Ramones
      B-52s
      … oh, and er… Neil Young & Crazy Horse

      posted in General Discussion
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • RE: That pesky Oscar Wilde

      Ha-hah!

      Our bad boyz have a lot to loin!!

      Now, pray tell, how does your life experience differ from those two quotes, gentlemen?

      = cheers

      posted in General Discussion
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • That pesky Oscar Wilde

      Now Oscar Wilde, that precocious childe, said,
      “…rebelliion is the best thing in man”

      but he also said,
      “…the note in perfect personality of man is not rebellion, but peace.”

      Please discuss…

      posted in General Discussion
      Z
      ZimZaxZeo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 11
    • 12
    • 6 / 12