Is it really that much of a worry? I havent looked at my MARTI for years. Tend to trust that what has been posted is correct. Surely nobody would bother cheating on what is essentially a board game…maybe im naive…
Best posts made by wizmark
-
RE: League General Discussion Thread
-
RE: trulpen's 1st G40 2v2-tourney: Challenges
@Gargantua I am very happy with the Chinese though…still in the game and still killing off the Japanese garrisons with their flukey hits on 1s
-
RE: Post League Game Results Here
Pejon 88 (allies) over wizmark (axis)
https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/34978/wizmark-x-vs-pejon-88-l-8-bm3/276
Another loss to the scandinavians…they must have an AaA college up there! Or maybe not much else to do in the long winter nights! :joy: :joy:
-
RE: Dawgwashers (X) vs Wizcats (L+20) BM3
@dawgoneit @WindowWasher @Sovietishcat What a convoy roll! That has to be the worst one ive ever seen!
-
RE: Problem accessing games
@pejon_88 I have had the same issue, I can only keep the game playing through my laptop which at the moment has the login details autosaved. If i try to access through my pc then i get the same problem even though i have changed my password.
So if you receive a solution please post it! :pray: -
RE: WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread
I agree as well for what it is worth, it makes for an edgy standoff…who has the strength to move first?
-
RE: trulpen's 1st G40 2v2-tourney: Challenges
@trulpen might have been a mistype lol…bids are now back in allied territory.
-
TripleA issues with BM
@regularkid
There seems to be an issue with the current version of BM3 (the 4.0 version) unless its a rule change I have missed…Submarines seem to have their stealth component removed, the first strike against a fleet with dds has gone and they seem to be forced into combat when lurking in a zone with no dd present but other surface ships (a cruiser and a battleship in my case)
When hovering with the mouse over a sub in 3.4 the stealth bonuses are noted , but if you hover over the unit in 4.0 these bonuses are gone
Is this just me or has anyone else had these issues? Or is it a rule change? I don’t like it if it is!
-
RE: WW2 Path to Victory - Strategies
Has anyone won as allies yet in PTV? Interested to see if the small differences add up or whether a bid is still needed?
-
RE: trulpen's 1st G40 2v2-tourney: Challenges
@WindowWasher Yeah…I for one am NOT looking forward to that particulat match!
-
RE: Wizmark X vs Argothair L BM game 1
@Argothair Not so much a ‘sneaky Karl’ move as a ‘lets ram a battleship right in your teeth move’!
-
RE: WW2 Path to Victory - Rules Discussion
@regularkid Great to see it in numbers thanks! Its just I know how scary a stack of german mechs and tanks roaring through the ME in the normal game is…with the extra defence and attack…poor UK!!
-
RE: trulpen's 1st G40 2v2-tourney: Challenges
@Karl7 my (and the UKs) finest hour! Rule Britannia, Britannia rules the waves!! 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
-
RE: Wizmark X vs Argothair L BM game 1
@Argothair Haha yes its certainly going a bit different to some games! Your landing in china was a surprise for sure! Take yr time though…best to get it right!
-
RE: WW2 Path to Victory - Feedback Thread
@simon33 as a interested observer I’ve noticed before your antipathy to that particular NO. What’s your reasoning if you don’t mind me asking?
It’s a small amount of ipcs, not too hard for the US to remove so doesn’t seem a game breaker? -
RE: trulpen's 1st G40 2v2-tourney: Challenges
@Karl7 I think that dd also took a German fighter down with it when the Luftwaffe came calling as well!
-
RE: Wizmark X vs Argothair L BM game 1
@Argothair haha well we will see how it goes! no scrambles thanks
-
RE: TripleA email game Global 1940 2nd edition
Yes very interested in gaming with someone new.
My email is wizmark555@gmail.com for the PBEM game.regards
mark
-
RE: TT Wizcats Allies +16 vs The Rum and the Fury BM3
@Gargantua Should have kept quiet…SovCat wont be happy with me! :joy:
-
RE: Wizmark X vs Argothair L BM game 1
@Argothair please use the 2nd file…changed a bit of non com