Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Weekend Gamer
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 15
    • Posts 389
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 1

    Posts made by Weekend Gamer

    • RE: Profession

      @Cmdr:

      @Gamer:

      You folks have seriously hijacked this topic . . .

      Now, back on topic, construction lawyer specializing bailing out people like Dezrtfish (i.e., estimators, project managers, construction companies generally, etc.) :-)

      Had the reverse happen, actually.  Construction lawyer tried to bankrupt myself and my company because the client ordered the wrong materials and the end result was a failure.  Luckily, I documented EVERYTHING and kept all the voicemails.  (I couldn’t afford my own guy like you to defend me. :(  )

      Sadly, I can’t afford me either. :wink: :-P

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Profession

      You folks have seriously hijacked this topic . . .

      Now, back on topic, construction lawyer specializing bailing out people like Dezrtfish (i.e., estimators, project managers, construction companies generally, etc.) :-)

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Patriots…

      @Imperious:

      Thank god the Patriots won! a perfect 19-0 record…er wait… oh NM

      LMAO – GO GIANTS!!!

      (Yes, I’m a bandwagon jumper, but it’s nice to see the Pats lose!)

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Single Pieces?

      e-bay – www.ebay.com

      posted in Miniatures (Original)
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Presidential Election (as a current event- watch the tone or it's gone)

      Give it up, Jenn.  Romney is a walking corpse.  Nobody but the diehards like yourself actually like him.  Say what you want about McCain – at least he’s not a panderer (okay, every politician panders, but I’m talking degrees here) in the same way Romney is.  Romney will literally say anything to posture himself as a conservative and get elected.  He did the same thing (in the left direction) to get elected governor.  Doesn’t that bother you at least a little?  I think it does most people, certainly here in Florida.  Witness all the endorsements for McCain here (Governor Crist, Senator Martinez) vs. none for Romney.  That should tell you something.

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Presidential Election (as a current event- watch the tone or it's gone)

      @Cmdr:

      What whacko pollsters were you getting?  Rasmussen and Gallup both had a significant lead for Romney over McCain in Florida.

      Anyway, Illinois has more delegates then Florida and we’re just one of what, 22 states running on Tuesday?

      McCain won the only poll in Florida that counts – the actual primary! :mrgreen:

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: 2008 Spring Gathering VI, Cincinnati, Ohio is Here!

      @frimmel:

      Those links didn’t work but the site is up:

      http://www.geocities.com/headlesshorseman2/AAspringgathering.html

      This is a fun event. Lots of great door prizes. Lots of folks. More A&A than you can shake a stick at.

      Are you going, Frimmel?

      posted in Miniatures (Original)
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Presidential Election (as a current event- watch the tone or it's gone)

      Well, McCain has been counted out before.  I wouldn’t be too quick to wager on his chances in November.  All Romney can do now is act as the spoiler.  Let’s hope he has something better to do with his millions than buying automated phone calls slandering the eventual Republican nominee.

      And I stand by my statement about Huckabee – no WAY is he the VP nominee.

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Presidential Election (as a current event- watch the tone or it's gone)

      Are you already counting out Obama as the potential nominee after that @ss kicking her administered to her in SC?  I think he’s got a real chance next Tuesday, personally.  Plus, I think at least half the members of her party must cringe at the thought of her as the nominee.

      As for Huck, he’s too much of a loose cannon to be of any help to McCain.  McCain has many options for a “Conservative” running mate – Orrin Hatch and Lindsay Graham are two names that readily come to mind.  It’s not like there’s a shortage of conservatives in the GOP.  Not to mention, Huck has been VERY weak in the recent contests, which begs the question how much support he will really bring.

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Presidential Election (as a current event- watch the tone or it's gone)

      Hmmmm, I only agree with you on the McCain call.  For one, it’s WAY too early to call the Democrat race for Hillary.  For another, I just don’t see McCain running with Hickabee, errrr, I mean Huckabee.  Joe Lieberman, maybe, or perhaps Rudy, but no way he taps Huckabee.  What does that get him?  Arkansas???

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Interesting Tank Battle in '39: Japan vs. Soviet Union

      I think one thing it proves is the Soviets (and Stalin in particular) were more flexible in their methods to reach their military ends.  I read somewhere that by 1943, Stalin was actually listening to his generals (including Zhukov in particular) and basically trusting and following their advice (for the most part) whereas Hitler was still micro-managing, ignoring his generals’ advice (for example, refusing to allow tactical retreats) and generally doing a poor job.  So the more flexible authoritarian system prevailed (it sounds funny, I know, but there it is).

      posted in World War II History
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Interesting Tank Battle in '39: Japan vs. Soviet Union

      Jermo, nice article.  And DF, your observations are good ones.  Another way of saying the same thing is, the very characteristics that cause authoritratian regimes to expand – the cult of personality, or mythology about the superiority of one’s race or political system – are the characteristics that cause them to fail in their expanionism.  Their ideologies blind them to “inconvenient truths” – truths which, inevitably, lead to their demise.  This is the real reason communism failed, and it the reason radical Islam also will fail.  In the case of the Japanese militarists, they could not question their own ideology that caused them to expand, because that was (a) their basis for their claim to power, and (b) the basic way they saw the world.  They could no more abandon their notions of honor than they could deny the deity of the emperor – it’s who they were!  So to say they should have learned from the Soviets is kind of like saying we should learn from Al Queda’s attacks on 9/11.  They just could not conceive that the Soviets or their tactics were something to emulate – only that, as between “inferior” races, the Russians were a tougher bunch to beat than the Americans, so why not pick on the Americans.

      posted in World War II History
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Statue on Mars? …you decide.

      DF, that was funny as hell!!!  That made my evening! :mrgreen:

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: 2008 Spring Gathering VI, Cincinnati, Ohio is Here!

      The links do not seem to be working, for some reason. :-(

      posted in Miniatures (Original)
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Presidential Election (as a current event- watch the tone or it's gone)

      @JWW:

      @JWW:

      I’m pulling for Giuliani. Any other Giuliani supporters out there?

      Silence……I take that as a no.

      :lol:

      James, I was initially pulling for Giuliani . . . until he basically did a disappearing act.  He played ALL his chits on winning Florida.  Well, I live in Florida and have seen the ads he is running and, let’s just say I am less than impressed.  His only messages are (1) stand strong against terrorism (ok, sure, but what else?), and (2) stop illegal immigration.  I mean, yeah, these are bread and butter Republican issues, but HELLO, THERE IS A RECESSION GOING ON HERE!!!  ANYTHING TO OFFER ON THAT FRONT???  His campaigning also seems frankly feckless – there does not seem to be any clear strategy to win the nomination, much less beat Hilary.  IMO at least.

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Presidential Election (as a current event- watch the tone or it's gone)

      @Cmdr:

      His only claim to fame is that he called for the surge in Iraq before the orders were issued by the President.

      In this time of war, when the surge seems to be “working”, I would think this would be a large chit in his favor, Jenn, no?

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Presidential Election (as a current event- watch the tone or it's gone)

      I don’t know what polls you are reading, Jenn. :roll:  But McCain has now won TWO of the polls that actually matter – the New Hampshire and now the South Carolina primaries.  If the conservative Republicans can swallow their doubts about McCain and actually nominate him, I guarantee many independents (as they did in NH) will prefer McCain over a very partisan Clinton with all the baggage she and her husband carry around.  If it’s McCain versus Obama, then it is experience versus NO experience which, to me, isn’t even a close race.  I will admit, I was down on McCain early on, but he is shaping up as the only serious candidate with a realistic chance to win.  Romney?  Please, he’s trying to pass himself off as a GWB clone, but nobody in the South is going to buy that from a Mormon.  And South Carolina’s results last night proves that Romney will not win here in the South, which means NO NOMINATION for Romney.  Super Tuesday should spell the end of Romney’s bid, IMHO, or come damn close.

      As for Huckabee, I think the trail ends here . . . Iowa was a fluke, and NOBODY outside the “true believers” is going to vote for him solely because of the “Fair Tax.”

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Presidential Election (as a current event- watch the tone or it's gone)

      @ncscswitch:

      It is a shame that no candidate has that ultra pragmatic position on illegals…  Draconian enforcement against employers who hire illegals… problem solved, and the illegals go home at their own expense.  Not even Tancredo who is now out of the race embraced that simple, practical and REVENUE GENERATING solution.

      There is a simple reason for that, Switch.  Do that, and you SHUT DOWN the entire construction industry in this country.  Outside of Union-controlled areas up North, easily 80% of your labor on construction projects are undocumented illegals (think carpenters, roofers, drywall installers, brick layers, etc.).  You shut down construction, you are guaranteed a recession for a VERY LONG time.  The problem is not, per se, illegal immigration.  The problem is a labor SHORTAGE in construction in particular coupled with absurdly low legal immigration quotas which forces these labor shortages to be met, through the “iron law” of supply and demand (read Adam Smith), through illegal immigrants.  Fix our broken immigration policy which is based on short-sighted and nativist anti-immigrant bias (nothing new under the sun in that respect in this country – always has been that way) on the one hand, encourage investment in Latin America (on a non-exploitive basis) to lift those economies whose stagnant nature drives people here in the first place, and you have the beginnings of a workable solution.  Throwing up a wall and hiring 1000 more border guards just pushes us further in the wrong direction because it denies and defies economic reality.

      I will also point at that, as a construction lawyer, I have counseled NUMEROUS legal immigrants to this country (including Russians, Albanians, Croatians, etc.) who are entrepenuers and investors in our economy who have come over here with basically nothing and have created their own businesses, thereby creating jobs and, through competition, kept costs down.  From my observation, it would appear legal immigrant-related businesses are largely replacing businesses started by natural born Americans in fields like carpentry, drywall and roofing for the simple reason that natural-born Americans no longer pursue these trades, by and large.  Instead, the children of roofers and carpenters are going to college, or just getting by on the old man’s money (or, worse, living paycheck to paycheck), with no ambition to start their own businesses.  Basically, without the “fresh blood” that new immigrants provide, I feel our country would lose its “edge” and enter into a long, slow slide into mediocrity.  In fact, we might already be on that path.

      So what does this have to do with the election?  I have no idea – none of the candidates are addressing anything substantive, but just re-gurgitating old, largely irrelevant slogans.  Romney and Guiliani are the worst offenders so far – based on their ads that I have seen.  Huckabee is just an evangelical nut with a smooth delivery (which, delivery-wise, is more than you can say for Romney, that’s for sure).  The Democrat nominee, whomever that might be, has to have the edge after 8 years of Bush (at 37% or whatever his approval rating is, not many Republicans like him either), but McCain may just be the one candidate who would stand a chance against Hillary or Obama as one who is definitely NOT a Bush clone who could still draw enough independents and Republicans (and even a few Democrats) who would have qualms about turning over the most powerful office in the world to a Hillary or an Obama, neither of whom truly have the experience the job requires (or should require).  Of course, in retrospect, neither did Bush . . .

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Church Shooting

      @dezrtfish:

      @ncscswitch:

      “The Internet is for porn!”

      @Cmdr:

      Amen to that.

      LMAO

      Which part made you laugh, DF?  The comment, or the fact that Jenn and Switch actually AGREED on something?! :lol:

      posted in General Discussion
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • RE: Axis Road to Economic Parity - Unlikely

      As Bean is aware, I just experienced this in my game against Rising Dragon.  By all rights I SHOULD have won that game, having overrun Moscow essentially without a fight and even liberating Berlin with a massive Japanese armor stack.  Anyone looking at that game would have sworn Japan would win.  However, the economic factor ultimately prevailed for the Allies, because I simply could not keep pace with Allied production, once the American factories in Western and Southern got up and running.  America literally went from almost no presence in Europe (after I destroyed everything defending Berlin) to upwards of 100 units in Europe (not counting UK’s units) in a VERY short period of time.  My early piece advantage got me to Berlin, but that’s as far as it went.

      But I would point out, in addition to the economic factor working against Japan, there is the dilemma for the Axis player of “Do I liberate Berlin?”  On the one hand, there is stuff to detroy there and you want to deny the Allies the IC.  But the downside is, the moment that capital is liberated, all original “grey” territories on the board revert to Germany, which ends up costing Japan IPCs for German territories it captured after the fall of Berlin.  AND on top of that, if Germany manages to cash out one turn, and if you cannot hold Germany (which happened to me), you end up handing the Allies a 20+ IPC gift when they re-take Berlin.  So, yeah, the “upper limit” in economy is a real problem for Japan.  The Allies simply can sit back, build large stacks of infantry and dare the Japanese player to attack.  Even if you crack Berlin or even Southern, a good Allied player will be able to push you right back with available “shuck” troops.  The key for the Allies is to build the IC in Western and keep shucking troops until the ICs get up and running and have enough troops on hand to defend themselves.

      All things considered, I think the Axis have a less-than-even chance of winning a capital trade scenario.  So if you’re the Axis, you need to hold on to Berlin for as long as humanly possible.  Once it falls, Japan has a tall order to win.

      posted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
      Weekend GamerW
      Weekend Gamer
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 19
    • 20
    • 6 / 20