Full edit above. Changed the fig and tac to Tsinghai instead of Calcutta. Feel free to raise any complaints.
Posts made by trulpen
-
RE: G40 Trulpen (allies +30) vs majikforce (axis)posted in League
-
RE: trulpen (Axis) vs crockett36 (Allies) OOB, no bid, #1posted in Play Boardgames
I say it’s a complete suicide to scramble. Maybe to get some few air off of Germany, but I count on you to not scramble. If you disagree, we can redo the battle in sz 110.
-
RE: G40 Trulpen (allies +30) vs majikforce (axis)posted in League
Last post only include edits in Pacific.
US:
a) 1 sub stays in sz 54UK:
a) 1 fig Burma -> Tsinghai
b) 10 inf, 2 art, 2 aa, 1 fig, 1 tac Burma -> CalcuttaANZAC:
a) 3 fig Calcutta -> Tsinghai -
RE: G40 Trulpen (allies +30) vs majikforce (axis)posted in League
Also I had intended to put the 3 ANZAC figs in Tsinghai, but that edit I guess is less controversial.
-
RE: G40 Trulpen (allies +30) vs majikforce (axis)posted in League
Didn’t realize the force that can hit Burma. May I turtle the Brits (10 inf, 2 art, 2 aa, 2 fig, 1 tac) in India instead?
-
RE: trulpen (Axis) vs DannyDuck716 (Allies+14), OOB, no tech #1posted in League
@DannyDuck716 No problem. Happens to me too, obviously. :) I edited a walk-on in the Baltic with Italy.
-
RE: trulpen (Axis) vs henryindiana (Allies+15), G40 A3, no tech, no LLposted in League
@henryindiana Did two edits with Japan.
a) Didn’t want to conduct shore bombardment with the damaged battleship, but only the two cruisers. TripleA took all ships automatically. There’s a die in there, but with the over-force, I don’t think it makes a difference. If you disagree, we’ll edit that back.
b) Second edit was a fighter from Amur to Chahar instead of Tokyo during NCM, connecting with the tactical bomber.
-
RE: Tirano (Axis) Vs. Trulpen (Allies +19)posted in Play Boardgames
Was apparently too tired yesterday. The ac slipped with the US. Thought it was in the battle. Pretty typical that the sub hit. My intention was to bring it since it’s not needed in sz 91 yet, so hope that edit is ok.
Also, I’d like to change the transport route for the British and put two inf in Denmark. Put some light pressure on the Germans. Another edit.
You’ll decide if it/they are ok.
-
RE: trulpen (Axis) vs DannyDuck716 (Allies+14), OOB, no tech #1posted in League
Sure, do that by edit.
-
RE: trulpen (Axis) vs DannyDuck716 (Allies+14), OOB, no tech #1posted in League
The only thing that happens is that the amphibious assault is prevented, right?
-
RE: trulpen (Axis) vs DannyDuck716 (Allies+14), OOB, no tech #1posted in League
@DannyDuck716 Do you want to change anything there?
-
RE: trulpen (Axis) vs DannyDuck716 (Allies+14), OOB, no tech #1posted in League
No scramble in sz 6. Scramble in sz 95.
-
RE: trulpen (Axis) vs crockett36 (Allies) OOB, no bid, #1posted in Play Boardgames
@crockett36 yes, I guess I have to scramble. OOL = 1) des - 2) ac - 3) fig.
-
RE: trulpen (Axis) vs Tirano (Allies +19), OOB, #1posted in Play Boardgames
@Tirano Guess you want to intercept in Moscow. Correct?
-
RE: G40 Trulpen (allies +30) vs majikforce (axis)posted in League
@majikforce Thanks again! Of course, that was silly of me. I’ll check and decide about the sub.
-
RE: trulpen (Axis) vs Tirano (Allies +19), OOB, #1posted in Play Boardgames
Scramble orders sz 110?