Posts made by TheCaptain

Thats what I Thought too, until I read this: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=ah/faqs/axisrevised  (its under strategic bombing)….

Though all my pals have made house rules to omit it tho.  Claiming it to be too “cheap”.

Well the problem being is that I was hoping to ship a stack of 8 to Britain and essentialy SBR Germany to rubble without the risk.   :cry:  :`(

One last question however:  I just read the A&A:R FAQ.  In the article relating to SBR and rockets, where it says: IPC loss from strategic bombing is limited to the territory’s income value. and they reply “per bomber”.  Does that mean i could hypotheticaly bomb Germany from 40 IPCs to 0 IPCs if i had enough bombers?  :?

Hello, I was just wondering if this strategy was legal (I know it is because i’ve heard about it on some forums before, but me and my friends just want to make sure.  (Their like lawyers, they want absolute proof).  anywho:

The plan is that I build a moderate stack of AA guns (say around 5) and research rockets.  From there, i can reduce Germanies economy to rubble with no reprisal on my part.

During the start of our games, my friends and I normally break down into a huge argument as to where the NA’s are distrubuted. Basically the allies want all the players to get equel amounts of NAs, whereas the axis want to have more because their not equel (allies get 3:2 ratio)

Allies argument:
-Axis are in better control of their forces.
-The Axis NA’s are better (as we normally choose from 1 or 2).
-We have a new player as Britain

Axis Argument:
-Allies would recieve more advantages
-USA’s NA’s are too good

What do you people think? Any solutions would be appreciated.