Topics created by SuperbattleshipYamato

@Krieghund

Thank you so much!

)89f8de53-eb0c-4026-990b-e3b6aca4969f-image.jpeg

@SuperbattleshipYamato You’re on. And no offense taken. I look forward to being handed a solid walloping.

@Lancasterlaw1175

I think your hypothesis is broadly correct.

But I think on a technical and logistical level (not sure about political), it seems to me that it was perfectly possible for the French to mobilize and brings the guns to the front much earlier, before September. This would’ve allowed them to begin attacking almost immediately and shatter the German lines. In retrospect, the French should be at fault for not mobilizing (and preventing the Poles from doing so).

The vast majority of Army Group C divisions were undersized (or even just command headquarters), while only about half of the French ones were deficient in some way (Nafziger’s book also lists the condition of French divisions in September-October 193o).

I got the book online here:

https://www.amazon.com/French-Order-Battle-World-1939-1945/dp/1585450189

@Krieghund

Thank you for clarifying!

@Krieghund

Thank you [I’m trying very hard to hide my disappointment]!

Here’s a solo game I created of Axis and Allies 1914 where the Allies have a big advantage (out of box rules with low luck):

2024-3-9-World-War-I-1914.tsvg

I’m not the best player myself, so I challenge anybody who thinks they can salvage this tough situation if to face me as the Central Powers (I’ll be the Allies).

I would like to try to play a game using those rules. Use the “Diplomacy 1914” map on TripleA.

I’ll be the Allies. I already rolled for Italy and it’s on the Allied side.

@The_Good_Captain

The dynamics here were definitely different compared to most of the solo games I played by myself.

@SuperbattleshipYamato said in [Global 1940] Balance idea for the Allies:

Give all the technologies of one row (the Allied player(s) chooses) to one Allied power (Allied player(s) choose), free of charge. These technologies apply at the beginning of the game on Germany’s very first turn for those powers. These powers cannot research further. Other powers research normally.

Do this twice with two different Allied powers.

If the Allied player(s) cannot make a decision the Axis player(s) choose (s).

For example, the Soviet Union chooses the first row and therefore has the technologies Rockets, War Bonds, Improved Mechanized Infantry, Advanced Artillery, Paratroopers, and Increased Factory Production, at the start of the game, and the US chooses the second row and gets the technologies Improved Shipyards, Super Submarines, Radar, Jet Fighters, Long Range Aircraft, and Heavy Bombers.

I think this can balance the game significantly for the Allies instead of a bid. If the game still isn’t balanced enough, do this with more Allied powers.

My contention is that Global 1940 is NOT a World War 2 game without technology. It is stuck in 1940l

@AndrewAAGamer

Huh. I always thought the opposite. Thanks for letting me know.

@gazza

Are we still playing?

I can’t make my moves since you haven’t done the French turn yet.

Let me know if somebody wants to play a game of Global 1940 (low luck, no bid) with Italy neutral and uninvadvable.

@SuperbattleshipYamato All good. Glad it clarified the rule for you.

@Eqqman

Nice personal story.

It’s amusing, for almost every point you wrote I heard someone say that was a World War 1 myth. I’m not saying it is.

So yeah, thank you for letting me know. As demonstrated by my games with The Good Captain, the Central Powers can indeed win in the game if the skill level between players is different enough.

@SuperbattleshipYamato Yes.

@Krieghund

Thank you! I saw that sentence but wasn’t completely sure that it implied what you said.

@ABWorsham4

Iowa’s faster and outranges the, hypothetically (not including fire control) Iowa can take out a ton before it runs out of ammunition.

If they’re fighting close Iowa losing to 8 pre dreadnoughts with 14 inchers sounds right. 👍

@shadowhawk

Makes sense. 👍