Did a small edit to take 1 tactical as casualty in 110 instead of the fighter. Great dice for Allies in 110
Best posts made by Stucifer
-
RE: L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v Crockett36 (L+120)posted in League
-
RE: Post League Game Results Hereposted in League
@mikawagunichi Hell of a game, I second the Hall of Records search.
Pacific was a complete bloodbath for the US & Japanese fleets the first several rounds, think we both ended up building new fleets basically from scratch there.
Allied supply lines to Gibraltar constantly being harried with many transports lost, but the UK & US managed to hold on and eventually turn the tide in the Mediterranean. Only to be set back with the sacking of Moscow and taking & holding London within a couple turns of each other.
-
RE: L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v FlyingBadger (L+48)posted in League
@FlyingBadger No scramble, Britannia shall rule the waves once again
-
RE: L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v Crockett36 (L+120)posted in League
@crockett36 Yeah, 2 bombers for nothing isn’t ideal haha
-
RE: L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v Crockett36 (L+120)posted in League
Oof. About 7 in 160 chance for that outcome.
-
RE: L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v Crockett36 (L+120)posted in League
@crockett36 There might be. The only rule I remember right now is that you can fly Japanese air over British & French territory when not at war. And that Japanese boats can’t be within two spaces of western US
-
RE: L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v Crockett36 (L+120)posted in League
@crockett36 said in L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v Crockett36 (L+120):
I once had this guy park the IJN off Hawaii without a DOW. That needs to be house ruled/fixed.
I believe that is an illegal move
-
RE: L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v Crockett36 (L+120)posted in League
“Japan may not end the movement of its sea units within 2 sea zones of the United States’ mainland territories (Western United States and Alaska).”
I guess that means you can sit in Hawaii (sea zone 26) according to the rules.

I don’t see anything else about restrictions on being near UK/ANZAC territories.
-
RE: L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v Crockett36 (L+120)posted in League
forgot to move my subs, use 2nd post please
-
RE: L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v Crockett36 (L+120)posted in League
Dangerous not to buy ground for ANZAC on turn 1 with all those transports at Carolines 😮
-
RE: L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v Crockett36 (L+120)posted in League
Between the holidays and extra work due to a bout of illness amongst my coworkers it’s proving to be a tough week to get caught up, sorry! 🤓 Hope you enjoyed a Merry Christmas
-
RE: L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v FlyingBadger (L+48)posted in League
Didn’t forget about our game, will post today!
-
RE: League General Discussion Threadposted in League
@gamerman01 said in League General Discussion Thread:
I’ve heard rumors from dark halls that there could be a late entry.
Tempted to sign up for PTV. I’m hearing a lot of affirmations from my shoulder 😈😈s.
-
RE: L24 PtV Stucifer (X+11) vs 666 (L)posted in League
Not any heavy bombers that I recall. I think the model they use for Italy might be the medium bomber SM.79.
Then again, Germany and Japan’s bombers are both medium bombers, and UK’s looks like a 2-engine, probably the Vickers Wellington.
-
RE: L24 OOB Stucifer (X) v FlyingBadger (L+48)posted in League
Skipped intercept in Normandy due to odds
-
RE: L24 BM Stucifer (X) vs Surfer (L+20)posted in League
@surfer Yeah I’m a little busy now but should have time after my playoff game.
-
RE: L24 BM Stucifer (X) vs Surfer (L+20)posted in League
@surfer might try a game with @mikawagunichi if he’s available, he’s a solid player around my level.
