Topics created by simon33

And that also is the reason for the sub in 91, to deter an attack there which is always an option as Germany. Both of those subs can attack 96 of course.

@simon33

sure, let’s do it, that all sounds fine with me.

@simon33 Sure, same bid.

I’ll be reviewing this game on YouTube if it’s okay with you guys! Very excited to see what Andrew does with the Allies.

@crockett36 said in AndrewAAGamer (Allies+60) vs Simon33 (Axis) OOB:

stalker alert! gl, hf guys!

https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/39938/andrewaagamer-allies-60-vs-simon33-x-oob-game-ii/10

@dawgoneit said in dawgoneit (Allies+60) vs Simon33 (Axis) OOB:

@simon33 I do believe that will do it.
I blame it on Egypt. Lol

Yeah, it is hard when Egypt falls early.

How are you going with this. I am tempted to claim this one due to inactivity. I think I am a fair way ahead in this one IIRC.

Thanks for the game. Don’t forget to post it.

Thank you for a good game.

Go again? I prefer same sides.

Oh and thanks for the game.

looks like i got distracted with india during usa/UK. good game. I will post it

@simon33

cool, GG.

@simon33 Ok, I can understand that rationale.

I think you can learn/improve something from every game played irrespective of a win or lose so it’s not played in vain.

@soulblighter 2 more objectives for japan*

As for leaving Normandy and Southern France empty, I guess an adjustment might be in order. Too much USA income from just dropping 1 inf on Normandy and N Italy can be attacked by too many planes which can land on Sth France. So maybe take SF only. That gives you 3/5 of the income anyway.

@simon33 Ok, I see.

Ok, you can start the game. If we do same bid I will do subs SZ106, 111 and 91. 1 IPC to UK Pac.

Otherwise let’s bid in the chat.

I do have one bit of feedback. USA rarely left Hawaii in the Pacific. I think they could have done more to slow down Japan. I don’t know if I left too many major gaps but at least liberating the Solomon Islands would have helped ANZAC and denied me an objective.

Also a few more subs in SZ97 would have disrupted Italy more than they were. They were never that strong but they could get some income past the 3 subs.

Thanks for the game!

@simon33

Hm, I looked into that game now. There was a problem with your aggressive Soviet tactics :) That Scandinavian gambit had to break one time.

When you want to play again, I have time, the only game I am playing now is actually against 666.

@simon33

Didn’t happen, even with 2.7.