Posts made by Sgt. Pavlov

Result: Per lwlo 2inf

Attack 1 Nwy 2inf tank
Rolls: 2@1 1@3; Total Hits: 02@1: (5, 5)1@3: (6)

Defend inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)

Attack 2 inf tank
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 11@1: (4)1@3: (3)

Defend tank
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (1)

Rus 6
buys with 50
10inf 4tank
HOW DO YOU LIKE THAT?! XD

combat:
1. 2inf Cau, tank Rus to Per vs tank
2. 2inf tank Fin to Nwy vs inf
3. 3inf Ukr, 3ftr EPl, ftr Rus to Bul vs 3inf tank
4. 15inf 2art 2tank EPl to Pol vs 3inf

Attack 1 Per 2inf tank
Rolls: 2@1 1@3; Total Hits: 02@1: (3, 3)1@3: (5)

Defend tank
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3)

noncombat:
1. 3tt with troops 2cc dd sub z10 to z12 drop in Alg
2. dd ftr cv z7 to z12
3. ftr SAf to z12
4. inf art Saf to FEq via tt z28 to z23
5. bmr WAf to Alg
6. 6inf WCa to WUS

mobilize:
6tank WUS
ftr WUS
tt z10

collect income:
53

I am curious as to what the nazis are up to o.O

SP_v_OBG_US5.AAM

at this point I am fairly confident I am going to lose. BUT that being said I will give it a round maybe 2. Also is the straight blocked off in 16?  I am not sure but it doesn’t affect my moves as far as I know.

USA buys with 46:
6tank
ftr
tt

combat:
1. 2inf 2tank GBr to Fra vs mt

hopefully you meant 2tank from france to italy not 2tank from italy to france :P I will assume you meant the prior seeing as how you only had one tank in italy at the start of your turn

opppp here is the map

SP_v_OBG_UK5.AAM

CALLED IT :P

results: Fra held with lose of 5inf

noncombat:
1. dd cv z12 to z7

place buy:
5inf 2tank GBr

collect income: not much
21

Annd again, this time I can’t see it going too well :S

Attack(3) Fra art bmr
Rolls: 1@2 1@4; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)1@4: (6)

Defend 2tank ftr
Rolls: 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 22@3: (5, 2)1@4: (1)

Weeelllppp let us see what pressing on does

Attack(2) Fra inf art bmr
Rolls: 2@2 1@4; Total Hits: 12@2: (3, 6)1@4: (4)

Defend inf 2tank ftr
Rolls: 1@2 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@2: (4)2@3: (5, 4)1@4: (2)

bmr survives…

Attack(1) Fra  5inf art 2cc bb bmr
Rolls: 4@1 2@2 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 44@1: (6, 1, 3, 3)2@2: (6, 5)2@3: (2, 1)2@4: (6, 3)

Defend 5inf 2tank ftr
Rolls: 5@2 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 45@2: (1, 5, 5, 1, 5)2@3: (1, 4)1@4: (4)

UK 5:
buys with 25:
5inf 2tank

combat moves:
1. 5inf art GBr bridge to Fra with bb 2cc osb support bmr vs 5inf 2tank ftr

aa-gun Fra on bmr
Rolling 1d6:
(4)

well that should be just about everything

SP_v_OBG_Rus5.AAM

increased factory production I guess :P

chart 1

Rolling 1d6:
(4)

welllpppp here is the tech-die again

Rolling 1d6:
(6)

Of course my moves other than Poland will stay the same, along with all of the outcomes.

Attack(1) Pol 2inf EPl, 3ftr Cau
Rolls: 2@1 3@3; Total Hits: 32@1: (1, 3)3@3: (2, 4, 1)

Defend inf
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)

grawr

probably not

A part of me really wants to say no, cause I already based some of my move off of the outcome, but I can not in good conscious say no.   So if you would like to yes