Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. runyan99
    3. Posts
    R
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 0
    • Posts 17
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by runyan99

    • RE: If you have AA-50th Aniversary- can you modify it to be this future AA 1940

      Regardless, it would be nice if some people would work on a new 1940 setup and ruleset for AA50.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Improved China Historical version for AA50

      Interesting addition of Communist Chinese forces.

      posted in House Rules
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Turning A&A 50 into A&A 1940

      Keep up the good work.

      posted in House Rules
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Release Date is December 15, 2009

      Shipping on Dec 22 would be late for Christmas. Chimps indeed.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Actual AA pacific 1940 map pictures

      Looks like China might finally be big enough to prevent a Japanese invasion into Moscow….

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Going to try to pull the wool over our eyes?

      Is there a lot of destruction of game components?

      posted in Axis & Allies Spring 1942 Edition
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Going to try to pull the wool over our eyes?

      How do you use 10 copies?

      posted in Axis & Allies Spring 1942 Edition
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Going to try to pull the wool over our eyes?

      Who would need 10 copies?

      posted in Axis & Allies Spring 1942 Edition
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: How to re-balance the -41 Scenario (team effort!)

      After one 1941 game it is clear to me that Japan starts with too many units, and is very hard to stop.

      My first suggestion to rebalance is a simple one. Use the 1942 Chinese setup for the 1941 scenario.

      posted in 1941 Scenario
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Control of Territory

      The NO’s for the UK include controlling any territory originally controlled by Japan. For the 1942 scenario, are ‘originally controlled by Japan’ territories where Japan starts with a control marker, or those regions where the board indicates Japanese control. For example, the Phillipines in the 1942 scenario?

      posted in 1942 Scenario
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Paratroopers

      If a bomber carries an infantry to a combat, and the bomber is destroyed by AA fire, what happens to the infantry?

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Subs Attack Vs trannies escorted by air only…

      @Krieghund:

      Correct, except that the defending fighters can’t hit the subs because there’s no defending destroyer.

      The rulebook is unclear about subs and defending air. The destroyer rules say that destroyers allow air units to attack subs. It isn’t clear what the rules are for defending air, as opposed to attacking.

      For instance, what is the procedure if a sub attacks a carrier with two fighters?

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Can subs attack subs?

      @Krieghund:

      The decision of whether or not to submerge is made both sides before any shots are fired, with the attacker deciding first, so a sub can only attack another sub if the defender chooses to fight (or if there’s an attacking destroyer). This will be in the FAQ.

      That’s not the way the rule is written. According to the manual, page 30

      “Anytime a submarine would otherwise roll the die to attack or defend, it can submerge instead.”

      Thus a sub attacked by another sub cannot submerge until after fired upon. A defending sub doesn’t roll until after the attacker does. Unless the manual is flat wrong. The manual mentions an exception for aircraft, but not enemy subs.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Dice Roller

      DiceRolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 01@3: (4)

      posted in Find Online Players
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Are there national advantages in aa50?

      I’m very suprised that AA50 does not include a rule for the Japanese/Russia non-aggression pact.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: This is a Limited Edition Game

      I’d like to see better treatment of the game in a PC version. They almost did it once, but as I recall the last Axis & Allies PC version had no multiplayer support, which made it useless.

      For those looking for something similar, I find Gary Grigsby’s World at War to be an excellent A&A PC substitute.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      R
      runyan99
    • RE: Revised Edition

      Last week, I miraculously managed to get three other guys together and play the revised edition of Axis and Allies. After 4 or 5 turns, the Axis controlled Leningrad, Moscow and Calcutta, and we called it a game. The Allied players weren’t terribly good, however.

      Overall, a good time. I like the new changes, particularly the 3/3 tank.

      posted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
      R
      runyan99
    • 1 / 1