Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Robbernosky
    3. Topics
    R
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 14
    • Posts 171
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Topics created by Robbernosky

    • R

      Global 1940 Map Print

      Customizations
      • • • Robbernosky
      16
      0
      Votes
      16
      Posts
      9.5k
      Views

      Young GrasshopperY

      Thanks LHoffman,

      Your appreciation is my inspiration… because I refuse to use a sheet of glass, my research has lead me to a material called styrene (google it) which is a type of plastic sheet that can be directly printed on. All indications point to this method being the last alternative to glass and although it cost around $240, it looks to be my best option. Even after flushing $300 so far in a crappy print, and installation complications, I’m happy with this new direction if it turns out the way I’ve been told it will. Basically it’s flexible plastic, so it should lie flat without air pockets getting trapped, and because it doesn’t get laminated, the colors should be slightly brighter. If it is sensitive to scratching than there is a clear film sheet by 3M I can look into, that’s where I’m at right now.

    • R

      Pacific 2nd Edition: Higher Quality Cardboard?

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • Robbernosky
      5
      0
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      1.2k
      Views

      toblerone77T

      @CWO:

      @knp7765:

      Yes, the Pacific 1940 2nd Edition uses the thick, heavy duty cardboard like Europe 1940. Not that thin stuff like in Pacific 1940 1st edition.

      And as I recall, the roundels in the 2nd edition of Pacific 1940 and Europe 1940 are both printed on thick, black-backed cardboard.  In the 1st edition, I think one of the games had white-backed roundels.

      You’re right Marc.

    • R

      Amalgamate Our Findings Into A Beginner Thread

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • Robbernosky
      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      732
      Views

      R

      I see lots of threads that are conversations about one direct topic.  Can we bring those together into a single thread, that would have some strategies for each nation, to kinda direct new players on what they should be doing?

    • R

      Tall Paul's Dad

      General Discussion
      • • • Robbernosky
      30
      0
      Votes
      30
      Posts
      3.9k
      Views

      ?

      Sunway Hotels & Resorts goes beyond accommodation to emphasise more on memorable experiences. Visit for amazing deals. Wherever you go in the Gulf Coast , go with one of our conveniently located Ramada Hotels . Take advantage of our online offers and book now. We offer Safe & Secure Online Hotel reservations & bookings service for your travel savings.

    • R

      Taking Back France

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • Robbernosky
      18
      0
      Votes
      18
      Posts
      3.0k
      Views

      JenniferJ

      No, I don’t like the idea of allowing the Allies to have 3 complexes in W. Europe.  Especially ones they don’t have to build.  A very common tactic for me is to abandon France to the Allies.  Let them have it and lose all their control in Africa and French Indo China, lose their complexes and then move back in.

    • R

      Balance Reporting

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • Robbernosky
      6
      0
      Votes
      6
      Posts
      1.5k
      Views

      R

      Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh, back on topic please.

    • R

      USA Alpha .2+

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • Robbernosky
      10
      0
      Votes
      10
      Posts
      1.7k
      Views

      JimmyHatJ

      @special:

      @JimmyHat:

      So then perhaps a better poll would be what round do you switch to European front as the US?  It will be important to add that yes we all know all games are different, this is asking for an average.  For my latest game US turned to the Atlantic on turn 7.  After chasing off the Japanese fleet, then capturing and building an IC in Korea.

      And what was the situation in Europe after that?

      Still to be decided, this game is not over yet.  Germany has reached the German Soviet border and made sure to take and hold all german territories this past turn.(7)  Italy has been bringing 3 turns of 4 trn loads to Syria, a large Italian army is present in Iraq/Persia/Npersia and Most of Germany’s navy is in the Caribbean protecting panama and putting a threat out on the US coast.

    • R

      New Carriers - For Better or For Worse?

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • Robbernosky
      25
      0
      Votes
      25
      Posts
      3.7k
      Views

      D

      @Graunie:

      The USS Lexington took two torpedo hits and 3 bombs during the Battle of the Coral Sea and continued flight operations until the battle was over.  Some explosions later sunk it, but that’s pretty impressive.  That was before they started putting torpedo hulls on the carriers.

      The USS Yorktown dodged 8 torpedos in that battle.  Got all busted up with bombs and scrambled back for the defense of Midway after a few days worth of repairs.

      If they were so easy to kill why didn’t they just kill them before they did so much damage to the Japanese fleet?  When the reality is every ship and plane is pretty much focused on taking out said carriers.

      They are two hit pieces for sure.

      Amen.

      I also like Gargantua’s idea of having both carrier types available to purchase.  You could consider one an escourt carrier and the other the main battle carrier.  I am guessing Imperious Leader can tell us what their abreviations should be (CV, CVE, ABCD, etc.).

    • R

      Abattlemap keeps crashing

      Software, Tools, and Aides
      • • • Robbernosky
      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      800
      Views

      R

      If I have abattlemap open for more than 15 minutes, it crashes.  Does anyone know how to resolve this?

    • R

      OOB USA

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • Robbernosky
      9
      0
      Votes
      9
      Posts
      1.6k
      Views

      AxisplayaA

      @Ruanek:

      That’s only holding it for 2 turns, and it isn’t easy for Germany to hit since it’s across the Baltic.

      It’s as easy as building a few transports…

    • R

      Japanzilla

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • Robbernosky
      11
      0
      Votes
      11
      Posts
      2.2k
      Views

      ghr2G

      @cts17:

      Don’t people normally take the Indian fleet to the Mediterranean?

      sometimes

    • R

      Russia Turn 2

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • Robbernosky
      36
      0
      Votes
      36
      Posts
      6.5k
      Views

      JenniferJ

      @Strikers:

      If you do not attempt sea-lion then Germany should not buy a carrier or pretty much any other surface warship except maybe a destroyer. An air base is the way to protect any vulnurable transports. Though I think one in Norway (if you can hold norway) is a better spot than one in Germany.

      The problem is holding Norway.

    • R

      Two Types of British Control Markers?

      Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      • • • Robbernosky
      5
      0
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      3.6k
      Views

      Pvt.RyanP

      Oh yeah I forgot about that! The control markers are for keeping track of income. Europe came with the global rules and everthing needed to play it so there ya go  :-)

    • R

      USA Atlantic or Pacific

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • Robbernosky
      5
      0
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      1.5k
      Views

      knp7765K

      A lot of this depends on the UK.  If Germany pulls off a successful Sealion, then the US should spend primarily in the Atlantic so they can liberate England.  You don’t want to totally ignore the Pacific, but just spend enough there to keep Japan from going wild all over the Pacific.  With good strategy and some luck, a smaller US presence, ANZAC and India should be able to keep Japan busy long enough for the US to get England back in the game before Italy and Germany get too strong.
      However, if Sealion fails or is not attempted, and the UK stays in the game for a while, then I would say US should spend primarily in the Pacific.  Again, you don’t want to completely ignore the Atlantic.  Perhaps a few destroyers to hamper German sub activity, some troops to help take back/keep Gibralter, maybe even a small invasion force on Normandy that can be backed up by British troops and open the way to liberate France.  With a small US presence, the Brits should be able to keep Italy in check in Africa and the Med while also harrassing the Germans enough so the Russians can better keep them from taking too much of Russian territory.  Meanwhile, a much larger US presence in the Pacific can pound the Japanese navy out of existence while steadily driving them back to Japan.  The US should be able to replace it’s naval losses better than Japan, especially since Japan will also have to support the land offensive against China and India.  Japan will keep losing valuable units while the Allies grow stronger.

    • 1 / 1