Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. RJL518
    3. Topics
    R
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 69
    • Posts 328
    • Best 3
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Topics created by RJL518

    • R

      WW2 75TH ANNIVERSARY POLL #6–JANUARY 1940--THE MECHELEN INCIDENT

      World War II History
      • • • RJL518
      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      2.4k
      Views

      C

      @RJL518:

      Do you guys think that Germany DID change their attack plans after the plane had crashed?Â

      I haven’t looked at the linked article, but one thing to remember is that the German plans for invading western Europe changed substantially (and many times) between the fall of Poland and the invasion of the Low Countries – so it would be hard to say whether this incident was (if at all) exclusively responsible for any particular changes a plan that was already evolving.

    • R

      WW2 75TH ANNIVERSARY POLL #5–DECEMBER 1939

      World War II History
      • • • RJL518
      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      896
      Views

      C

      Escaping Montevideo Harbour – possibly.  Getting all the way back to Germany – extremely doubtful.

      In terms of getting out of the harbour, Langsdorff would have had two options: heading across the river Plate to Argentina, or making a break for the open sea.  If he’d headed for Argentina, there was no guarantee that he’d be any better off than in Uruguay.  Argentina had some Axis sympathies, I think, but it was still nominally neutral, and the British and French would have put the same diplomatic pressures on it as they had put on Uruguay to respect the Geneva Convention and either intern the ship or force it to leave.  Making a break for the open sea was problematic too.  The British had made sure that the Graf Spee’s departure from Montevideo was in a carefully defined time window by making use of an article in the Geneva Convention that prohibited a warship from sailing from a neutral harbor less than (I think) 24 hours after an enemy merchantman had left the same harbour.  There were British merchant ships in Montevideo at the time of the Spee incident, and the British arranged for one of them to leave the harbour at the right moment to put Langsdorff in a bind between the Geneva Convention and the expiration of the Uruguayan government’s deadline for the Spee to leave.  Harwood’s cruisers were lying in wait nearby, and it’s doubtful that the Spee could have given them the slip.  Moreover, the shallow waters of the Rio de la Plata area were unsuited for combat from Langsdorff’s perspective because his water intakes might have gotten clogged with mud.  Additionally, having the ship sink in combat in shallow water carried the risk that secret equipment and papers would have fallen into Allied hands (this being less of a concern if, as eventually happened, the ship was scuttled under controlled conditions).

      Assuming for the sake of argument, however, that Langsdorff had managed to elude Harwood, getting back to Germany would have been very challenging.  Although the Spee was technically still able to sail and fight, the damage she had suffered in the original battle with Harwood had left her in very poor condition to make a long sea voyage.  Harwood, even if he’d initially been eluded, would still have been close by and would have sent his ships (and his scout plane) to look for the Spee; additionally, some British and French naval groups were already converging on the general area following Harwood’s initial battle a few days earlier, so Langsdorff would have had an awful lot of sea power focused on finding him.

    • R

      WW2 75TH ANNIVERSARY POLL #4–NOVEMBER 1939

      World War II History
      • • • RJL518
      14
      0
      Votes
      14
      Posts
      3.9k
      Views

      poloplayer15P

      All of the above

    • R

      WW2 75th Anniversary Poll–- # 3 OCTOBER 1939

      World War II History
      • • • RJL518
      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      768
      Views

      C

      The “just sit and wait for the Phony War to end in April 1940” option is a bit perplexing as an answer to “You are the German High Command!  What is your next Combat Movement?” because it seems to imply that the Phony War was operating on a fixed timetable, and that this timetable was in someone else’s hands.  The lack of action on land on the Western Front is certainly due in part to inaction by France and Britain (whose strategy was basically to sit around for a couple of years to built up their strength for a showdown, while simultaneously hoping that the Nazi regime would be overthrown by a coup), but it was also very much a deliberate choice by Germany.  The Wehrmacht needed to analyze the Polish Campaign, fix the tactical and operational elements that hadn’t worked as well as expected, plan the upcoming campaign against France and the Low Countries, rest and replenish its forces, give them more training, provide them with additional equipment, and redeploy them to the west.  Doing this properly took time, but Germany could afford to take the time to do the job right because of the lack of Anglo-French pressure on the western front. ( In other words, by sitting on their collective hindquarters France and Britain surrendered the strategic initiative to Germany, which gave the Wehrmacht the luxury of attacking at the time and place of its own choosing.)  Moreover, the time period during which these activities took place were the fall of 1939 and the winter of 1939-1940, which was conveniently timed because this meant that the Wehrmacht wouldn’t have to fight in the fall (manageable, but rainy and muddy) or in the winter (far less harsh in the West than in Russia, but still potentially nasty as veterans of the Battle of the Bulge will recall).  The late spring / early summer period chosen for the offensive in the West was much more congenial for military operations.

    • R

      The 30 IPC Rule

      Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      • • • RJL518
      6
      0
      Votes
      6
      Posts
      5.2k
      Views

      R

      ok…i got it now…thanks KriegHund…aka the “WarMaster”

    • R

      Happy birthday Leo

      General Discussion
      • • • RJL518
      7
      0
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      1.8k
      Views

      Me1945M

      Iraq 1991, Kuwait 1991, Somalia 1992-94, Bosnia 1995, Iran 1998, Sudan 1998, Afghanistan 1998, Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999, Afghanistan 2001, Libya 2011. About 700,000 civilians were killed in Iraq and Afghanistan only plus millions injured. Not saying about indirect invasion.
      I’d present the country that only one can resist, you call it making a problem, this madness.

    • R

      Attacking Defenseless Transports

      Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      • • • RJL518
      7
      0
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      2.8k
      Views

      W

      Congratulations: I could not wait to be a Tank (and wished I could have remained one!).
      I started playing in 87 at university.

    • R

      Larry Harris' G42 Scenario cut in half

      House Rules
      • • • RJL518
      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      2.0k
      Views

      W

      Problem with halving it is that, then we have played, we have always gone KJF. Japan becomes far too strong in two turns. The US’s income is needed to counter this. I believe the Western US would need a bonus of 40 to compete.
      It is possible if you played Europe alone, the Allies should be ok with the IPCs on the board.
      Try it and tell us your thoughts.
      I do like the 42 set up, as it more realistic historically.

    • R

      Fortress America

      Other Games
      • • • RJL518
      9
      0
      Votes
      9
      Posts
      9.8k
      Views

      GargantuaG

      HBG’s Amerika isn’t out yet!  I paid big money as a backer and havn’t seen a damn thing!

      Waiting for it…

    • R

      WW2 75th Anniversary Poll–- # 2 SEPTEMBER 1939

      World War II History
      • • • RJL518
      17
      0
      Votes
      17
      Posts
      6.8k
      Views

      C

      @Herr:

      The Soviet Union indeed intended to spread communism all around the world, but whether that would necessarily have implied a military invasion of central Europe in the 1940’s, is not certain. Their approach varied quite a bit, from inciting revolutions of the “working class” in other countries, to promoting wars between “bourgeois” powers, to actual war.

      Also, if I remember correctly, Lenin’s death was followed by a power struggle in the USSR between the Trotsky faction, which wanted to pursue an agenda of internationalist communism, and the Stalin faction, which wanted to focus on communism at home (or whatever the phrase was).  The Trotsky faction lost, with Trotsky himself eventually going into exile and ultimately being assassinated.

    • R

      Triple AAA vs the Board

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • RJL518
      7
      0
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      2.7k
      Views

      R

      @Young:

      I believe that the celestial energy running from my third eye, through my chakras, and into my dice… allowing me to roll a 1 at will when facing an enemy strategic bomber raiding my factory… can’t be achieved with the automatic random dice roller machine used online.

      So it’s table top for me all the way.

      Let me have what your smokin…you need to share!!

    • R

      Asking for A&A Europe 1941 setup

      Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      • • • RJL518
      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      1.3k
      Views

      W

      Hi. You could use Larry’s 42 set up. I have played that quite a bit on AAA with others here. You would probably have to play 3 times to see how much of an at War NO the US needs to compete against the Axis, without tilting too much in the allies’ favour.
      Please report back how it goes  playing Europe stand  alone.

      I don’t know if you play AAA or whether you would want to download it, but I attach a 43 version I set up and have played twice.
      The axis cannot win and that was my intention. It was solely done, as I love playing  Germany with its back to the wall, with the nasty Russians growing stronger and invading Germany proper.

      Global43.tsvg

    • R

      Asking for A&A Pacific 1941 setup

      Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      • • • RJL518
      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      1.7k
      Views

      W

      Midnight Express had done about 10 variants. Look in House Rules. You might have some luck. Or PM him.

    • R

      Piece count

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • RJL518
      24
      0
      Votes
      24
      Posts
      4.3k
      Views

      Midnight_ReaperM

      @Patchman123:

      @knp7765:

      Yeah, I’ve gone kind of piece crazy myself. I have a specific set of pieces for each nation in Global 40 I call my gaming sets. Here is what comprises each nation set:
      100 Infantry
      50 Artillery
      50 Mechanized Infantry
      50 Tanks
      40 Anti-Aircraft Artillery
      40 Fighters
      30 Tactical Bombers
      30 Strategic Bombers
      40 Transports
      40 Submarines
      40 Destroyers
      30 Cruisers
      20 Battleships
      20 Aircraft Carriers
      100 Control Markers
      And that is just OOB units! The only exception is China, but they still have 100 OOB Infantry units. I also have some HBG units for China for artillery, tanks and fighters (some house rules allow China to have tanks).
      To get these totals, I actually got several copies of the game when they came out and cannibalized them for pieces. I was able to sell off extras which helped me make back some of the money I spent, but it was still pretty pricy. 
      On top of this, I have huge collections of HBG’s sets in just about every color available. This part is really silly on my part because I pretty much use the Olive Drab for US, Dark Grey for Germany, Burnt Orange for Japan, Maroon for Russia. Basically the OOB colors. So all of those other colors, like the Axis Minors, Neutral sets, US Supplement for Allies and alternate colors for the Japanese Supplement and Expansion sets just basically sit there in their containers. I keep thinking I will use them in trying out the HBG 1939 Global variant because it has all these little countries and you can use all the variant colors to represent them, but I never get around to doing so. My group simply prefers Global 40.
      When I think back on how much I have invested in all these game pieces, it almost makes me sick. I enjoy my games and it’s a fun little hobby, but there is such a thing as too much.
      Obviously having such large sets is not necessary. You can always use chips which in some cases you simply have to because of space limitations on the board. I hope you are able to find your balance. However, I must agree with YG, the pieces in a single game are simply not enough.

      How many PER game, NOT total. What I mean by total is counting Europe 1940 Sec. Ed. and Pacific 1940 Sec. Ed separately, instead of as one game.

      You can calm down - that posting is 3 and 1/2 years old and was just showing off how much money he’d wasted on extra pieces how many extra units he had for playing A&A.

      There’s a Patchman123 on BGG who asked similar questions earlier this week - I answered the main questions he asked there. Assuming Patchman123 on A&A.org is the same person, I answered your question there and to help out the forum I’ll answer the same question here:

      @midnight_reaper:

      @Patchman123:

      Could I please have an inventory on how many pieces there are with Europe 1940 First Edition and Europe 1940 Second Edition for all the countries involved in the game, such as France, United Kingdom, Italy, United States,Germany, and the Soviet Union?

      I noticed that when I was selling Axis & Allies 1942 First Edition from 2009, that some Axis & Allies pieces from other games have been mixed in.

      Could please have an EXACT count on how many pieces there are supposed to be in these games?

      Exactly how many pieces are in all the editions of Axis & Allies from 1981-2017?

      I am trying to sort my game out.

      Let me point you at some online resources to sort things out. First, do note that some pieces are only in the First Edition, some only in the Second Edition. This post from axisandallies.org discuss which pieces changed between editions: www.axisandallies.org/p/whats-new-in-axis-allies-pacific-1940-and-europe-1940-second-editions/

      That said, here is a listing from the Harris Game Design forums that lists what comes in a copy of Europe 1940, First Edition (well, both Europe and Pacific, but that will get you to Europe…): http://www.harrisgamedesign.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=18469

      And here is a forum post from axisandallies.org that lists what comes in a copy of Europe 1940, Second Edition (well, both Europe and Pacific, but that will get you to Europe…): https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=30066.0

      -Midnight_Reaper

      Source: https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/1943468/number-pieces-europe-1940-first-edition-and-europe

      What are your further questions?

      -Midnight_Reaper

    • R

      Axis & Allies: THE MOVIE

      General Discussion
      • • • RJL518
      18
      0
      Votes
      18
      Posts
      1.9k
      Views

      W

      That is mad, Garg.  I love it!

    • R

      75th WW2 Anniversary Polls–#1 AUGUST 1939

      World War II History
      • • • RJL518
      11
      0
      Votes
      11
      Posts
      1.9k
      Views

      NarvikN

      Yes Marc, but in that case UK and France could just as well accepted the proposal from the Sovjet Foreign minister Litvinov and marched into Germany in 1933 to arrest Hitler. After all, Hitler did threat to attack USSR in his book Mein Kampf, so nobody could say they didn’t know. It looks like the capitalist Brits hated the commies so much, they wanted Germany to grow strong and kill the commies. So no, I don’t think the Brits or the French would have done anything to prevent the war from starting. It had to be prevented by someone else, like the Terminator coming to 1936 by accident, and mistaking Hitler for John Connor

    • R

      A&A Units equivalent

      Axis & Allies Global 1940
      • • • RJL518
      6
      0
      Votes
      6
      Posts
      1.4k
      Views

      R

      thanks all…as always great insight from everyone

    • R

      70TH ANNIVERSARY DISCUSSION (6) THE ALTMARK INCIDENT

      World War II History
      • • • RJL518
      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      783
      Views

      R

      In your opinions…were the British justified in boarding the Altmark while it was in Norway’s waters?
      Did they violate the Neutrality of Norway before they were invaded by Hitler?  Was there any other way of rescuing the British prisoners held in the Altmark?

      Looking fwd to your answers…

    • R

      Best WW2 Videogame you have played!

      World War II History
      • • • RJL518
      20
      0
      Votes
      20
      Posts
      3.7k
      Views

      T

      Medal of Honor Frontline you essentially play as James Bond in WWII

      Medal Of Honor: Alllied Assault

      The best Omaha beach mission of any FPS.

      Very true Allied Assault was really good the last level was a bit anti-climactic but the D-Day and operation torch missions were really cool.

    • R

      70TH ANNIVERSARY DISCUSSION (2) THE PHONEY WAR 1939-1940

      World War II History
      • • • RJL518
      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      1.3k
      Views

      R

      i agree…Stalin would have LOVED this outcome…

    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 3 / 4