Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Razor
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 19
    • Posts 952
    • Best 3
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Razor

    • RE: Rules Q&A

      @ksmckay:

      So if USA SBRs an island airbase (for 3 damage) then the UK and ANZAC can attack the surrounding sea zones without japan being able to scramble aircraft since Japan won’t be able to repair (since they havent had a turn yet, and then of course they can repair it on their next turn)

      You are one clever guy. Lets just hope nobody will take advantage of this rule flaws and be gamey.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      RazorR
      Razor
    • RE: Rules Q&A

      @Krieghund:

      The reference in the rules to Australia being an exception for purposes of ICs not being able to be built on islands is a mistake.

      Razor want to smite the editor on this one. How hard can it be to make a clear and rational rulebook ?

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      RazorR
      Razor
    • RE: What Scupts to use for France

      Now Razor want to adress the topic.

      French infantry is nation specific. (Promises, promises)
      Artillery is typical allied, used by all 5 allied nations. (Why am I not surprised ?)
      Mech inf is M3 ( used by 4 of the allies)
      Tank should be US Sherman. (They did use a lot of US equipement.)

      All aircrafts should be russian molds.

      Destroyer and cruiser should be russian molds.
      The other ships should be US molds.

      Oh and BTW, what retard have smited me 10 times ? I am new to the forum for christ sake, how about putting up some respect ? What kind of place is this ?

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      RazorR
      Razor
    • RE: What Scupts to use for France

      @jim010:

      It would be neat if the French units came with little white flags  :-D.

      (Someone had to say it.)

      No that is not very funny. If any infantry should come with a white flag, it would be the british infantry at Singapore in 1942. On that day 150 000 brits surrendered to 35 000 japanese without a fight. If ships can come with white flags, I hope the neutral Sweden cruisers have them. Remember Psilander, when a single brit cruiser make 4 swedish cruisers surrender without a fight, outside the Phaero island in 1942. Butt the french, they did put up a fight, they did defend themselfs. A half million casualties prove that.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      RazorR
      Razor
    • RE: Map Info

      @Craig:

      If you have paid attention to how I do things, you would know I don’t have a problem saying or doing what is necessary.  With that said, I don’t want that tough, old airborne soldier showing up on my doorstep and giving me what for!

      So basically you are scared of an 82-year old senior citizen that live in the other side of the country ?
      Razor is scared of nobody. Razor is real American.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      RazorR
      Razor
    • RE: Solving the biggest problem: an army with all types of units

      Razor like, and hey its not too late, we all mail Larry tonight and tell him to ditch the NO’s and instead give an Combined Arms bonus, al right man .

      posted in House Rules
      RazorR
      Razor
    • RE: Solving the problem with the lack oftactical bombers and armored infantry pieces

      Yeees, Razor like. Butt iff WOTC did business that way, the stock holders will be poor. With lack of Tacs and Mechs we all need to purchase two copies each, and this will make mr. Leeds a very happy man.

      posted in House Rules
      RazorR
      Razor
    • RE: Pacific 1940 review copy has arrived

      @djensen:

      They are part of the standard game. If not, there would be no reason to go after the islands with no point values.

      Guess what, D.J. Razor dont like the NO’s. They just dont fit. An island have a strategig value in itself, since you can build airfields and ports there. Also in this game we have convoys. And the classic system with IPC income from territories. Then Razor figure that NO’s will be like fat on butter. We dont need it, its just one more thing to keep track on. Razor will mail Larry tonight, the game is not out yet, it is still time to change the rules.

      You think *Razor is kidding ? Look at the rational behind NO’s. Japan control Wake and get 7 IPC as NO. Usa control Wake and get 3 IPC as NO. Aussie control Wake and get 1 IPC as NO. India control Wake and get 0. Go figure.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      RazorR
      Razor
    • RE: The role of the british

      @Brain:

      It’s most likely that guy who started the smite club.

      Me too got smited, and I only have 8 postings. What kind of place is this ?

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      RazorR
      Razor
    • RE: Pacific 1940 review copy has arrived

      Tell me David, are the NO’s optional, or part of the standard game ?

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      RazorR
      Razor
    • RE: Re: Field Marshal Games Pieces Project Discussion thread

      Hi folks, me too want to get this pieces. How long I have to wait ?

      posted in Other Axis & Allies Variants
      RazorR
      Razor
    • RE: Schedule of previews of AAP40

      @Krieghund:

      The tactical bombers are larger than the fighters so that they’re easier to tell apart.

      The large Tacs are going to look very funny on a carrier.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      RazorR
      Razor
    • 1
    • 2
    • 44
    • 45
    • 46
    • 47
    • 48
    • 48 / 48