@Amon-Sul I will not, but have not seen it. I can understand how it might be beneficial :)
Best posts made by Pejon_88
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
-
RE: Pejon_88 (X) vs. Wizmark (Allies+6), P2V first gameposted in League
@wizmark Can’t seem to take Algeria hehe. 3rd turn in a row.
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
@Amon-Sul I think I needed to be at war in the Pacific theatre. Maybe @wheatbeer can confirm? All other allies could pick them up as soon as you declared war on the neutrals.
-
RE: Pejon_88 (X) vs. Wizmark (Allies+6), P2V first gameposted in League
@wizmark another crazy round dice-wise for the Axis. I did not ask about scrambles at Midway or the SZ due to near 100% odds. Neither in Burma. Hope I didn’t overstep and assumed incorrect.
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
@Amon-Sul and @wheatbeer Thanks wheatbeer and yes very unusual and interesting game :)
Will look at it soon I hope. Have three other league games running too.
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
@Amon-Sul Haha Sweden! Maybe I need to punish the dudes in Yugoslavia a bit extra now ;)
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
@Amon-Sul Happy new year to you too! I am very much looking forward to this game, don’t think otherwise it is just that I have three very intense games running which are all undecided right now. That is the only reason why I have not played for a while I thought since we just started and that this is for L21 you would not mind :)
With that said I will really try and play tomorrow!
Cheers!
-
RE: League General Discussion Threadposted in League
@andrewaagamer As a more experienced player, how could we have further strengthened Moscow? I totally agree regarding the neutral crush.
-
RE: League General Discussion Threadposted in League
@andrewaagamer thanks for your comments. I agree with most of them. We also did some additional errors a long the way and failed at a couple of crucial attacks, such as Leningrad but these might not have mattered after an early loss of Moscow.
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
@amon-sul Oh right! I will do that instead until the issue is fixed :)
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
@pejon_88 Finally! Sorry about that.
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
@pejon_88 You got me on the convoy too :)
-
RE: Pejon_88 (X) vs. Wizmark (Allies+6), P2V first gameposted in League
@wizmark Haha yeah :) but I was expecting that. Italians were never any good in Africa (if you look at the real war): ;)
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
@pejon_88 I guess it only would work as in our case, that Germany declares war.
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
@amon-sul I think the Axis have been very successful so far. Great playing!
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
@amon-sul I believe so according to the rule: …During your Combat Move phase in which you entered into a state of war, your transports that are already in sea zones that have just become hostile may be loaded in those sea zones (but not in other hostile sea zones). In effect, transports may be loaded in their initial sea zones for amphibious assaults before war is declared, while the sea zone is still friendly.
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
@amon-sul Still, Axis are strong!
-
RE: L21 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Pejon_88 (Allies + 16)posted in League
@amon-sul I really like your experimentation. I actually thought loosely on something similiar once, but never put much thought to it :)