Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. ozimek1
    3. Posts
    O
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 7
    • Posts 51
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by ozimek1

    • RE: Anyone tried KIF (Kill Italy First)

      Props for trying to come up with somthing original.

      It’s funny that you call this strategy KIF, when the most controversial (and thus the obvious signature maneauvre) move is sending a bunch of Russians againts the Japanese in China. Actually this seems rather counter-productive if the main aim is to quickly break the neck of one of the European Axis.

      Are you sure the US should send their Pacific fleet to the Atlantic? I mean the Russians are putting a significant pressure on the Japanese war effort on the Asian mainland, so perhaps a small US fleet in the area could achieve something relatively easily? I mean, since the Japanese will have to invest more ressources in the land war, it will be more difficult for them to counter any US fleet activity.

      Also, I prefer to buy at least one UK transport in UK1. You can place it in a Luftwaffe-safe spot on UK1, use it UK2 vs. Norway/NWE/France, and cover it with a defensive naval purchase at the end of UK2.

      posted in 1941 Scenario
      O
      ozimek1
    • RE: R-Day in Europe (R for Release)

      I just got an email info that www.spiele-offensive.de sent my copy from Germany today. Hopefully it will be here in Denmark before the weekend, as I have a game planned Friday night!   :|

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      O
      ozimek1
    • RE: Alternate East-West Map Connections

      Nice idea. Don’t you think Mexico should border Central US?

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      O
      ozimek1
    • RE: WANTED: 2-4 Italian AA50 Tanks

      Need them for G40 isntead of the dreadful Italian Panthers?

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      O
      ozimek1
    • RE: Taking the Phillipines - USA Pacific strat.

      @anchovy:

      I suggest that you take a look at some of the games that Yoshi plays against top players in the '41 league.  He basically abandons Europe with the US.  It is killer!   :-o

      Could you please elaborate? I’m not sure how to “take a look at these games” :)

      posted in 1941 Scenario
      O
      ozimek1
    • RE: Reinforcing India

      In my latest game, I moved a US bomber to India via Queensland. It took out a transport off of one of the DEI islands on the way, which was my main reason for doing it. Also it was useful in harrassing Japanese shipping lanes along the Chinese coast. Obviously it only contributed indirectly to the defense of India, but it was fairly painless to get it to the area.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      O
      ozimek1
    • RE: Article Submissions forum

      It would be nice if game-specific articles metioned the particular game in the subject. Ie “[AA50] Russian Far East tactics” or “[Revised] German opening moves”

      posted in Blogs
      O
      ozimek1
    • RE: DIY tuck box inserts

      @skinny1:

      @Dylan:

      @fanofbond:

      Yeah hard paper would me nice.  I made mine out of the flimsy stuff and it doesn’t do a very good job during transport but they keep everything nicely separated during play.

      I still prefer zip locks

      I use zip lock bags too.

      Aren’t they a pain during play?

      posted in Customizations
      O
      ozimek1
    • DIY tuck box inserts

      As you all know, AAP40 came without the insert rooms in te tuck boxes that we got in AA50. Inspired by AA50, I made some inserts that are fairly easy to print, cut, and fold.

      You may have noticed them on Boardgamegeek, if you are frequenting that site. (or at the HGD forums).

      There are two versions for different paper formats:

      • A3 format paper: http://www.boardgamegeek.com/filepage/51250/diy-tuck-box-insert-a3-format-printing

      • Letter format paper: http://www.boardgamegeek.com/filepage/52700/diy-tuck-box-insert-letter-format-printing

      There is also a guide on how to assemble them here:
      http://boardgamegeek.com/thread/482533/diy-tuck-box-insert

      Enjoy!

      posted in Customizations
      O
      ozimek1
    • RE: G1 naval build?

      I must admit that I jumped from page 3 to 7 so please forgive me if this theory has been discussed already.

      Most seem to agree on these premises regarding German navy builds:

      • A: Main objective: Delay D-day

      • B: Secondary objective: Ship units to Karelia/Scandinavia

      • C: Major problem: Cost

      • D: Major problem: Vulnerable to RAF counter(UK fighter builds)

      • E: Minor problem: May end up in sub-optimal battles on the defense. Dilemma in when to abandon

      I think a submarine - aircraft combo might be a solution.

      Further analyses:
      A: OK the main objective is to keep any invasion fleets at bay. To some extend this can be accomplished with the Luftwaffe, but this leaves Germany lacking in cheap cannon fodder, resulting in costly battles. Combining submarines and planes could solve this problem. This would require deployment of Luftwaffe in a position to strike in the Atlantic. The disadvantage is obviously that it makes it difficult to utilize especially fighters vs Russia. Using Bombers can alleviate this problem fairly effeciently.

      B: Forget this with a submarine strategy. The surface ships are doomed to be air raided.

      C: Obviously submarines are far cheaper than surface ships. 2 on each of the first couple of turns will make a major difference if you mange to be very aggressive (more on that later).

      D: Submarines are immune to air raids, if you don’t let enemy destroyers attack you.

      E: Submarines are less likely to be cornered and end up in a undesirable battle, but if it happens it is liekly to get extremely ugly.

      They key is to be very aggressive and attack ANY destroyer that gets within range of the Baltic sea. If it’s just a lonely destroyer, send one sub and the Luftwaffe. If it is a major fleet, you have to all-out attack with all subs and the Luftwaffe (and pray you got the math right and kept enough air power in range.) It takes a fairly significant fleet to challenge 4 subs and 4-6 planes. There will be some tricky movement, and I may have missed some finer points here. Is it doable?

      posted in 1941 Scenario
      O
      ozimek1
    • RE: New theory for Allied KGF. A possible balancer maybe? Need Logistical help.

      In this particular strategy I’m not completely sold on the idea of sending Allied fighters to Russia.

      We really need all the Allied fighters (esp. US I guess) we can muster to hold NWE after the landing. I’m not sure exposing them to danger in Russia can potentially risk the entire plan. Also stationing them in Russia will most likely make Germany less aggressive during Barbarossa, which is counter productive for the overall Allied game plan. I mean, the more German units that are stuck deep in the Russian steppes, the weaker the counter attack on NWE will be.

      This might sound crazy, and I haven’t really thought it throgh, but here goes:
      Assuming the western Allies are going aggressively for an early NWE landing, how about building two Russian bombers on turn one and start a strategic bombing campaign on Germany? Would the front crumble completely too fast? Note that the bombers can also be used for swapping territories when (not if) the front gets too close to Moscow. Again the key objective is to get an allied foothold in the western continental europe (NWR or France that is). I’m thinking bombers are probably the best way the Russians can support this plan. At least they are more flexible and less all-in than a reverse PQ17 operation :) Russian transports going out from Karelia to backstab the Germans, heh :roll:

      posted in 1941 Scenario
      O
      ozimek1
    • 1 / 1