@oysteilo said in OOB Oysteilo +40 v Gamerman01 with tech - UHD map:
@gamerman01 said in OOB Oysteilo +40 v Gamerman01 with tech - UHD map:
NM, I don’t think I want to do tokens, actually. Benefits the allies too much, having more powers in play.
I am not sure I understand either way?
you mean the tokens stay after unsuccessfull research? No, I dont want that
lets see if we can develope some techs here
its possible i missed a couple of planes in my calc. Dont recall about a 90% chance on this. i hate this map
Coming up in a day or two
@GovZ said in GovZ (Allies +41) vs. oysteilo:
Not really - I just decided the attack on your ships was way to dicey to risk. I ended up taking the safe option across the board.
I judged it that way when I did Japan. That you woudnt do it. Nevertheless, it is a great question to ask!
I ill have to look at this tomorrow, but we will find a way I am sure
I am happy with your posted map. I hope you are too!
This looks like a good way to go forward. Thank you for figuring out the error, I missed it 100%
take your time here, I am away for about 10 days now
I did not see any funny business from the engine during the sub battle, but calling it a stalemate is kind of generous for the japanese, if the tranny survived I would maybe agree. Good kill there for med taking out the carrier. Hmmmm, I am surprised you didnt consider a sub only attack. We will see if the chinese can make any trouble here… To early to tell
I am sorry about this. I hoped to post today, but it wont happen. I am away for 10 days now. Again, I am sorry
It turned out to be a trap. Me and my friend do live games 2-3 times a year, with plenty/too much booze. As the allies i messed up and left anzac wide open and he claimed it. However, he had no escape after i moved down from Hawaii… too much beers! Haha, fun times. Its a pitty he wont play in the league. He is better than i am.
@gamerman01 said in OOB Oysteilo +40 v Gamerman01 with tech - UHD map:
And then there’s the war bonds :O
At first when I saw 6,6 of course I thought you got 2 techs.
I’m glad you remembered to give yourself the +1, the house rule
I hoped for extra support for art
No question i have been very lucky in this game and i also think it would be hard for you, but there is always a chance for a diceing in London…… I did not expect/plan for this game to turn into a sea lion. But then again i did not expect you to scramble to 110.
But your unpredictable style is fun to play!
yeah, that was a really crappy result, expected -10, but turned out to be +50 something. Well, you have the option of retreating so maybe I underestimate the power of that. We stick with the result no matter what so it is what it is. when I saw this result I was afraid I had overlooked something, but I had not…
I believe the mongolians should have turned red, but looks like they are not. Do you agree they are red? If so I will just edit them. Nice to have this agreed before moving on
I will look at it in a day or so
@Amon-Sul said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
ANZAC has a transport in sz Java which is contested with Japanese ships.
Japan has a sub in sz 37 (on the coast of Malaya) and ANZAC has an infantry in Malaya.
Can ANZAC move its transport from Java sz to Malaya sz , load the infantry and then move to Borneo sz and capture the undifended island (for UK) with this infantry from Malaya?
Is this move legal?
Haven `t played in a long time and not 100 % sure about the rules.
P.S. Triple a allowes the move.
Thanks in advance
I am happy to answer, but I am not an official person on this forum, just so that is clear.
The move is legal. You are not in combat when you do your combat moves. Hence the transport can ignore the sub in the combat move phase, but it cant ignore the sub when it is actually conducting combat, then the transport must be asissted by a warship.
@Amon-Sul said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
@oysteilo said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
@Amon-Sul said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
ANZAC has a transport in sz Java which is contested with Japanese ships.
Japan has a sub in sz 37 (on the coast of Malaya) and ANZAC has an infantry in Malaya.
Can ANZAC move its transport from Java sz to Malaya sz , load the infantry and then move to Borneo sz and capture the undifended island (for UK) with this infantry from Malaya?
Is this move legal?
Haven `t played in a long time and not 100 % sure about the rules.
P.S. Triple a allowes the move.
Thanks in advance
I am happy to answer, but I am not an official person on this forum, just so that is clear.
The move is legal. You are not in combat when you do your combat moves. Hence the transport can ignore the sub in the combat move phase, but it cant ignore the sub when it is actually conducting combat, then the transport must be asissted by a warship.
so my problem would be if japan had a sub in borneso sz (where i plan to unload my inf) otherwise all good :)
correct
I am away for a few days, I think I need to look at a few things with the calculator
From my side: it is key to kill the german Fleet, so two hits by my fighters are good, but three would have beeen better.
I dont think I had a realistic chance of killing your fleet AND taking London bsck, so main focus for now is your fleet.
I think I have a decent chance at it. If I fail, game over.
