Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. nikola1975
    3. Best
    N
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 48
    • Posts 4,807
    • Best 57
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Best posts made by nikola1975

    • RE: PtV Nikola1975 (axis+6) vs Max334

      @max334 It was a different plan. I wanted to roll one round, kill around 12 of your units for the price of 12 of mine and then retreat to the safety of Bengal forests. I wanted to wear you down as you would be pressed between German panzers and crazy Japanese soldiers

      But after the first roll, I obviously had to take it through.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: Playoff PTV Nikola1975 vs Avner (+8 Axis)

      @avner Yes, sure, no problem.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: PtV FlyingBadger (Allies) vs Nikola1975 (Axis +5)

      @flyingbadger I believe scramble is not possible here - scramble from carrier is only possible if there is a surface warship defending?

      In any case, I would not scramble.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: PtV FlyingBadger (Allies) vs Nikola1975 (Axis +5)

      @flyingbadger

      It’s fine, don’t worry. It seemed that the fleet is too weak to withstand Japan’s wrath.

      38688-flyingbadger-vs-nikola-G7.tsvg

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: Post League Game Results Here

      @666 won over Nikola1975

      L22 PtV 666 (allies) vs Nikola1975 (ax+7)

      More then deserved, on almost every front. One comment I made in the thread as well - combo of Anzac fighter on the American carrier is a bit overpowered when used this way. Looks almost like cheating when it can cover half of the world map inside the same turn :)

      (this added by Gamerman01):
      Discussion on ANZAC planes moved to G40 forum, here:
      https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/39211/anzac-planes-on-us-carriers/2

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L22 PtV 666 (allies) vs Nikola1975 (ax+7)

      @666 Sure, no problem. I will train in the meantime.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: Post League Game Results Here

      @simon33 (allies) won over nikola1975 (axis), PTV L22.

      https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/39189/ptv-2022-simon33-allies-vs-nikola1975-axis-5/204

      I thought if you take Moscow and India, you are very close to winning. Unfortunately, Simon proved too tough even with that, even with Japan’s income 90+ for some time. I tried to be aggressive, maybe it was still not enough.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: 22L PTV playoff GeneralDisarray vs Nikola1975 (Ax+12)

      @generaldisarray

      It’s amazing how you are closing Germany from all directions with relatively limited resources. I am doing few things wrong and cannot turn it around.

      Scramble here?
      g8 scramble.tsvg

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: Post League Game Results Here

      PtV League 2024
      @Daaras won as Allies vs. @nikola1975

      It was a good, but too short game. After taking London, Germans just could not hold Soviet and American advances… There are some comments on the game in the last messages in the thread.

      https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/41046/l24-ptv-nikola1975-axis-12-v-daaras-allies

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L24 PTV: Nikola1975 (Axis +12) vs. Stucifer (Allies)

      @Stucifer

      I assumed:

      1. No interception in London, it was 3 in bombing fleet, vs. 1 fighter.
      2. No scrambles from London or Stalingrad, these two were obvious.

      Would you like me to ask for similar decisions in the future?

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L24 PTV: Nikola1975 (Axis +12) vs. Stucifer (Allies)

      @Stucifer Bah. This is not fun anymore - the income difference is too big for few rounds now and I can’t see how to overturn it. You are defending all key points very well, and threatening to take some additional income in new round.

      I will surrender. Very well played. It might have been too easy for you, this one?

      Looking back what I did wrong:

      1. The Iceland adventure to chase that battleship was probably the first big mistake in Europe - the fleet went too far away, it was basically shut off from the game for some time, allowing Allies to kill the Italian.

      2. Not enough focus in Barbarossa.

      3. Taking Guinea island seemed like like a good idea, but again, I was too far, and it was too easy for Americans to disrupt that income, while Pacific UK managed to build defense. Japan seemed ok for some time, but lost too much time there, while not really threatening Australia.

      • Few wrong “small” decisions on battles, which just made the situation worse.

      What do you think?

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: Post League Game Results Here

      @Stucifer won against Nikola1975
      L24 PTV: Nikola1975 (Axis +12) vs. Stucifer (Allies)

      https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/41079/l24-ptv-nikola1975-axis-12-vs-stucifer-allies/97

      Too strong for me in this one, plus made some wrong decisions with both Axis fleets, sending them too far from the place they probably should have been.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L24 PTV: Nikola1975 (Axis +12) vs. Stucifer (Allies)

      @Stucifer said in L24 PTV: Nikola1975 (Axis +12) vs. Stucifer (Allies):

      @nikola1975 said in L24 PTV: Nikola1975 (Axis +12) vs. Stucifer (Allies):
      I was worried about that armour stack coming through Ukraine for a while, but the lack of power up north let me shift everything down to Stalingrad. I think that is one of the clearest strategic errors in hindsight. 2nd was not taking Crete both to give Germans the NO and also to force a reaction from UK. For your bid as Italy if you are going to go Med I think a destroyer in 99 and an infantry in Tobruk is a better spend. Or a mech + armor between

      I will probably try a sub for Italy and infantry for the Germans in Holland in our next game. Mediterranean is hard, good Allied player like you can make a strong position in Egypt and the Middle East, basically stopping Italy very early.

      Like you said, Crete and Malta/Cyprus are important, but I usually tend to wait taking them until I build the carrier or German comes down to help. Which did not happen in this game.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L24 PTV: Nikola1975 (Axis +12) vs. Stucifer (Allies)

      @Stucifer said in L24 PTV: Nikola1975 (Axis +12) vs. Stucifer (Allies):

      1. Iceland the battle went well for you but gave me breathing room as the UK to put more money into Egypt without worrying about a Sealion. I almost didn’t scramble the fighters because losing those ships doesn’t put me any further behind than I usually am as the UK in the Atlantic with a German naval build on round 1.

      The idea of just putting fighters there and not scrambling them is great. I tried this maneuver once in a live game, but scrambled the planes and it went disastrously for UK - but only putting them there, not scrambling and therefore getting German fleet to the North is excellent. You either keep the Battleship, or give some room for Gibraltar move.

      This makes German strafe on the battleship questionable move. Maybe it is better to go until the end, risking that German BS if needed?

      1. Definitely put Italy to the screws and kept my income as UK to the point I was barely putting resources into the Med as the US. I think if you don’t do Sealion you are probably best off with Germany focusing on either supporting Italy getting its NOs in the Med or with Italy focusing on getting some income in Russia that can’t be convoyed and supporting Germany with a strong mechanized can-opener force, going for the Southern Caucasus hard.
        I also prefer to push hard to Leningrad early and often build a 2nd transport in the Baltic to shuck 4 infantry in each round. This has the added benefit of making Norway a less tantalizing target to the Allies. It also lets me exert pressure on Moscow early while pivoting mechanized to Stalingrad, ideally forcing the USSR to retreat and only trade it by round 5 or 6. Italy if supporting can rush through to capture Southern Caucasus and at that point I should be around 80+ with Germany.

      This is a good plan of course, but I never manage to get to the Caucasus or Stalingrad if I focus north. Italy could be the difference there, you are right, I rarely support that attack with more than one Italian tank - I usually invest into the Meds with them heavily. Which did not work at all in this game.

      1. Guinea/Solomons is a good NO to suffocate the ANZAC but you have to have really good fleet positioning to keep the flies away. Priority is always the money islands for me, but denying ANZAC or UK is pretty high too. I really like the Wake Island hold as the US if I can get away with it.
        The Phillipines/SZ36 seems underrated in a lot of games I see as the primary staging area for your main fleet.
        I like SZ37 and use it a lot but it, doesn’t have the reach to SZ55. From 36, you are forcing the Allies to use either 2 blockers or not hold 55. 36 also supports amphib attacks on Wake, Marshall, Gilbert, all of Indonesia, Queensland, and Malaya, while being able to retreat to SZ 6/7 to defend the Home Islands if necessary.

      Wake Island harbour was very successful for you, it made life very hard for Japan. Again, this sounds good when you tell it like this, but realising it is probably not easy.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L24 PtV Stucifer (Allies) vs. Nikola1975 (Axis +9)

      @Stucifer Standard scramble decisions for G1.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • L24 PtV Stucifer (Allies) vs. Nikola1975 (Axis +9)

      A rematch. Going in with not much expectations, except to:

      1. Have fun.
      2. Have a good intellectual challenge.
      3. Learn something new about this game, which I already learned in a Game 1 with @Stucifer .

      I will put a bid of 9 to Italians (sub) and Germans (infantry).

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L24 PtV Stucifer (Allies) vs. Nikola1975 (Axis +9)

      @Stucifer Standard question and standard answer - hoping that one day Italians will get lucky. Yes, scramble all three…

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L24 PtV Stucifer (Allies) vs. Nikola1975 (Axis +9)

      @Stucifer I made a small mess with editing during the combat.

      I wanted to send an infantry with 2 planes to Kweichow. Somehow I sent him to Yunnan to attack the biggest army Asia has seen. Then I wanted to fix that by editing him to attack Kweichow. It doesn’t work. In the end, I returned everyone back, like attack to Kweichow did not happen.

      Hope you understand what I am saying.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L24 PtV Mikawagunichi (Allies) vs. Nikola1975 (Axis + 12)

      @mikawagunichi

      • 2 subs
      • 3 destroyers
      • 1 Ju87 bomber
      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: Post League Game Results Here

      https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/41161/l24-ptv-stucifer-allies-vs-nikola1975-axis-9/

      Stucifer rolling over Nikola, for the second time. Just too strong.
      L24 PtV Stucifer (Allies) vs. Nikola1975 (Axis +9)

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 2 / 3