Posts made by Mr Ghoul

The Germans had a “Blitzkrieg” style of warfare planned in the frist World War. The plan was rehashed in the second with the aid of armor and mechanized infantry.

[ This Message was edited by: Mr Ghoul on 2002-03-26 18:54 ]

Of all the things about WW2 that ive read or watch, never once had i heard anything about Russain aircraft.

The Black SS uniforms, i think, looked cool.

The US marines in the Pacific had hardcore uniforms to.

Mesh helmet netting is always tight.

Very true TC ……ummm TG

[ This Message was edited by: Mr Ghoul on 2002-03-26 17:44 ]

i havnt tried bidding yet, but its got to make the game more interesting.

Stukas sound the coolest. I like the Jap Zeros as well, the white ones. Its a tight little aircraft.

I think the US have the biggest muscles on the block so ,of course, their going to flex them. Being Canadian and watching and listening to our ridiculous government fumble itsway around world affairs, Im totally behind almost anything the States does. Our Canadian Prime Minister is a f#@%@*$ joker.A Stupid looking bastard. The US has direction, there decisive. They are the New World Romans.

As for the Middle east, just let them kill each other, same goes for India and Pakistan.

I dont belive Yannys 14

Oops here is my email

dhansey@upper49th.com

Im in yo. Set it up, lets dig in.

Both

As wicked as the German tanks were, like the Tiger and Panther, which, for the most part ,were better than anything else in their class, it came down to a production game. About 5000 Panthers saw action in the war. Only a few hundred Tigers were made and just the best Divisions recived them, like the Waffen SS. As for the Tiger 2s’ or the Jagdtiger, less than a hundred of each were produced.

The P-38 Lighting looks the coolest to me anyway.

It had a 76MM gun, i dont think range was a problem.

How many Russain died on the eastern front compared to Germans? Who won the battle on the eastern front? Casualties are not the way to measure victories. They (the US) fought for how many years?….and your saying they werent “geared up for war”?!

Ya, your right, Rommel was tight.

What about Vietnam?..…GI. So much for the over strengthened military.

[ This Message was edited by: Mr Ghoul on 2002-03-21 18:49 ]

HOLY post!

Why wouldnt you play with 2 hit Battleships?

I dont know that Rommel was that good, as much as, the British were inexperienced. His(Rommel) main tactic was to attack British positions, engage their armor, fall back and draw the armor into tank traps(hidden anti-tank guns). Once the allies recognized this, it was on.

i was being sarcastic