I would buy it but I would also be upset and feel like WOTC is cheating me out of my money because they should already have this included for a $70.00 BOARD GAME.
Posts made by molinar13
-
RE: IDEA - Global Game Ruleset & "Additional Items" Seperate Expansion Pack?posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
-
RE: Anyone Anticipating Halo Reach?posted in Other Games
Actually one thing I noticed is that Bungie is using the same Spartan characters from the Halo book series. (Like I said I am a fan and when I can I read the books). However as you mentioned if you introduce a new enemy weapon ect… people will ask why it wasn’t in the original games. And based off of my assumption if Bungie does go by the book series they will have to introduce a lot of new weapons, at least from the Marines. This would be interesting in terms of both multiplayer and campaign. Ill just have to wait for the beta to find out but I just hope Bungie will not take the series over board.
-
RE: A combat simulator for Pac 40?posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
Little things like that would prevent me from using it. I have tried it in the past and Triple A is a good way to develop strategies when you do not feel like setting up the board game.
-
RE: A combat simulator for Pac 40?posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
Some people have said that a Triple A version will be available for it, but I don’t know much about it.
-
RE: Craziest rolls you've seen in AAP40?posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
I figured that was what happened. This scenario is why I have trouble as Japan pulling the trigger on assualts that should work, but could also go very wrong. I probably play too timid because of it.
I hear you on that dinosaur. This is why when people say invade U.S. I say to them, “good luck”.
-
Anyone Anticipating Halo Reach?posted in Other Games
I don’t know about you guys but I am a big Halo fan. However with the recent Halo Wars, Halo ODST, and now Halo Reach I am afraid Bungie is going to kill a once good series. I mean come on Halo was practically the reason why the original xbox was a hit. Halo wars was fun but there was not a version for the PC. WHAT THE F!?!?! Why would you make a RTS for a game console but not for computer. Strategy games for me (and most of the gamers I know) are better using a mouse instead of a controller. Next came ODST. The story mode was good, and Fire fight was a female K-9 on Legendary. However after 2 months I grew tired of the darn thing and the only reason why I still have my copy is so I can play the Halo Reach Beta sometime this year. My question to Halo fans out there is, how do you feel about Halo Reach?
-
RE: Craziest rolls you've seen in AAP40?posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
All my escorts were blown up in the previous battle against the U.S. ANZAC just came in to pick on the left overs. The battleship was not damaged either. And ya, so much for harrasing ANZAC the next turn.
-
RE: Craziest rolls you've seen in AAP40?posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
I was playing as Japan and all was well in the South Pacific. I had 1 battleship and a carrier loaded with 2 fighters in the seazone that surrounds the Solomon islands. 4 brave ANZAC fighter took me on and won!!! with only 2 casualties :-o
-
RE: Turn Sequenceposted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
Since the will not last past turn 1 might as well make them usefull :wink:
-
RE: I don't knowposted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
Say that it can be used as an educational tool to learn about history, and that the game can be used to look at possible scenarios that could have happened. :-D
-
RE: Turn Sequenceposted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
Not to mention one country has to be Cannon Fodder
-
RE: COD: Modern Warefare 2posted in Other Games
Ya its xbox live. I will send you a friend request when I can. I usually play Friday nights and Weekends.
-
RE: American split income?posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
If its not combined income then I hope the U.K. and Russia can hold their own.
-
RE: COD: Modern Warefare 2posted in Other Games
My gamertag is xxxam13xxx, if you want to ever play send me a friend request. Just make sure you also send a message saying your from the board so I know where its coming from.
-
RE: What do we want in AAE40 that we didn't get in AAP40?posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
Nice, I like the concept
-
RE: Barbarossaposted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
That’s what Im hoping for, unless Larry put some rule were Japan and Russia have a non aggression treaty for good, but I dont think players would like this.
-
RE: Getting extra pieces?posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
Out of the many brave souls that have taken on WOTC I count only 2 have been succesful. Im not discouraged though Ima keep on trying.
-
RE: COD: Modern Warefare 2posted in Other Games
Unknown strangers once got chopper Gunner and AC-130 all at the same time, final round on search, :evil:.
-
RE: Axis & Allies Clubsposted in Player Locator
I guess it would have to depend where you live. I live in Houston, TX so this one specialty shop in Rice Village always plays AA whenever it gets enough people. What Im trying to say is try your local specialty shop.
P.S. Are there any players here from Houston or Texas?
-
RE: Barbarossaposted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
If the U.S. does not have a combined income (were the U.S. spends 50 towards pacific and 50 towards europe) the I think Japan should not even focus on Russia. The already have a beast after them why be distracted and attack another? Sure Germany will distract most Russian forces But with Japan also attacking this takes up resources and will give the U.S. an opportunity to just pick a Japan’s defense. Again only if the U.S. has no combined income. If the U.S. does have a combined income then that will drastically change strategies.