@wittmann:
I see. I think the Total War games are great. Except Shogun. Am looking forward to Rome II.
Surely are. But the time to play is limited. There are tons of very interesting strat games to try.
Need to win in lottery to be able to play them all.
@wittmann:
Have any of you played Napoleon Total War? Was my love love for about a year. I would play as Prussia, of course.
Haven’t played.
Games I have played mainly:
1. Battle of Wesnoth
2. Steel Panthers: World at War
http://www.matrixgames.com/products/297/details/Steel.Panthers:.World.at.War.-.Generals.Edition
Meanwhile in Vienna.
A new popular fast food served on the streets: Frog Legs.
Like I said, Austria is waiting for you. If you want to interpret something then do it straight: Austria is asking for it :)
So shut it pimp and bring it on. Austria is waiting for you.
Pfft, I have never said so.
I have said that this is better in my opinion because this tries not to be balanced, but does have more players.
Emperor Franz I of Austria is becoming very impatient.
Or lets wait if we face each other in the tournament :mrgreen:
no u :-D
I think we shuld see it.
Want to try 1vs1?
The Ottomans should play after Austria, but Russia has moved already. As this is the case, you’re more than welcome to turn existing Ottomans to neutral :cry: gg!
Here is an example of your sportmanship. You assumed the command of Ottomans troops after I won Constantinopole :roll:
Now listen.
I have said many times you won. I have said also why you won. There is always a reason why someone wins. You won because of the free navy by UK.
What is hard to accept in that?
Then you say 3 way war, it was YOU and only YOU that declared war on the Ottomans. If you were smart enough, you would have bribed them into attacking me from the south, instead of forcing them to defend.
you got a free austrian army and a free ottoman capitol, I’m sorry UK didn’t help you too lol
Why you say I would had had to bribe Ottomans to attack you when I conquered Ottomans, getting free access to their lands? Which in turn was so shocking to you that you moved in your turn remains of the Ottoman troops, like you would had been commander of them :roll:
It was fair for me to expect that UK was something else than your free navy.
You just can’t admit that :mrgreen:
Stop blabbering that nonsense, though there was something good in it, you clearly understand why you won with your free navy.
Had UK tried to take Sweden, hereby doing something else then being your free navy, he would had had to invest on Sweden. If you still wanted to take Sweden, then you would had to invest on Sweden.
UK investing Sweden would had been away from UK Medi operations, which would had meant I could had invest more on Central Europe.
You investing to Sweden would had been in turn away from your Central Europe investments.
All that together would had meant more power for France in both Mediterranean and Europe, and less power for you in Mediterranean and Europe.
Now you can say that you would had not contested Sweden. That does not change the fact that UK fought all the time against France (what he is entitled to do), and never at any point against you, even when he could had stopped you from winning (when he should had fought against you no matter what by taking Sweden). I said this to him well in advance, and he replied to me something idiotic “maybe I take Paris” :roll:
You got free navy by UK, which never did anything to deny win from you.
GZ of your victory. Want to try Free For All where I have free navy?
lol if instead you were the one to win I bet it would have been out of smart play.
The reality is that the only one that could have stopped me was France. But you wanted badly to expand…
UK is not as strong as you think he is.
IMHO France and Austria are stronger.
Are you not a man enough to admit that your victory was COMPLETELY made possible by UK being your free navy, and not even trying to deny the win from you? Who had access to Stockholm? UK. What UK did? Fight against France. You two were never in war during the whole game, not even then when UK was the only one able to deny the victory from you.
You are total shit if you can’t admit that fact.
To the extant that the evil French Republic may choose to interfere more in the efforts of Russia to reach seven victory cities before His Majesty’s forces capture the seventh yellow, yes you may pick the winner.
Earlier in this thread there was griping about the invincible position of the Britain because of the naval disparity. I can see your point about the disparity, this is my first game on this map but after a few turns to get the hang of it the British navy is very hard to stop.
Here, the delusional UK thought that he would have a chance to get 7 cities, lolololol.
What I want to know and what will be my last question is that did you manage to talk UK to believe that you would not take Stockholm before UK can get 7 cities too? If you did, then that was some EPIC politics.
If you did not, then UK was just your free navy.
Hmm, just thinking. One should be able to propose politics one by one and not all at once.
Let’s follow the game rules.
There is no rules which say you should declare all politics at once.
The game mechanics however allow you to make proposals only one at a time. You propose something and get the answer BEFORE you can make your next proposal.
moilami UK cant enter the Baltic
UK could had landed to Vastra Gotaland and from there proceed to Stockholm. The canal access was totally unneeded for him. Even my aunt could understand that.
The only reason you won this is because you had free navy by UK.
I ask you one more question after I have found the UK to quote.
How did I played Degrasse? I basically never sent him a pm.
If you reinforced Austria instead of attacking the Ottomans? Maybe you could have convinced the Ottomans to attack me.
You played Degrasse/UK by UK not trying to deny the victory from you in Sweden even though I said him well in advance to do so, or else you win because none else can do it.
Idiot UK was your free navy, and would had been the best if he would had told so at rouund 1 so that we never played this shit game.
I don’t begin to argue what I should had done and where, when the fact is that UK did nothing to deny victory from you at the time when he was the only one to do so.
So talk about Kingmaker with your free navy.
It was 3vs2 from start to end, and we still smashed one of you.
Now lets try again in a map BALANCED for team play :mrgreen:
Hmm, just thinking. One should be able to propose politics one by one and not all at once.
Not wanting to ruin the game for people but imagine an alliance between UK and France :-D
I would be curious to see how far that goes.