Posts made by mikemikemike

We will be playing AA (version tbd but of the 1940 era) on Sunday, 9 NOV at noon at Rock N Roll Meatballs located at 179 Elm St, Manchester, NH. They have a large back area with nice tables and they are more than happy to have us. We will have to pack up at 6pm, however.

They have great food and drink. Invite others even if just to watch a bit. Plenty of parking on Elm Street- note this is the southern end of Elm Street. Use the Queen City Bridge since there is some silly marathon going on in the center of downtown.

We have 4 people confirmed and a few visitors who will be with us.

Thanks,

Mike 603-660-3440

Hi, a small group have been playing monthly here in NH. We are going to play Axis & Allies Global 1942 (a variation of 1940 which is being play at most tournaments and official games nowadays) as follows:

Saturday, 6 September
Set up 10am, play 11am
547 Pembroke Street, Pembroke, NH (Hillside Baptist Church)

An air conditioned church function room which we have access to the whole day

We have 3 experienced players confirmed (Alex, Randy who has church access, and me)

https://smo63.fatcow.com/pdf/G42setup2013424.pdf which has the AA G42 rules

We intend to play to the end of the game… Food and non-alcoholic drinks are encouraged
There is a small kitchen area with stove, microwave and refrigerator. Bring a snack.

Email, call or text for any questions or items. 603-660-3440, mikpel at hotmail dot com

Note: to try to make the game go faster, we will encourage you to anticipate purchases and have strategies ready if at all possible.

New players: we will help you out… or partner you up with an experienced player. Invite others who may be interested.

Once your capitol is captured you lose your IPCs. If you liberate it, the IPC are re-calculated for your next turn. BUT, if the capitol is captured again that very turn, do you still lose all the IPCs once again? Thanks.

Hi, a group of us are playing AA1940 at the American Legion in Concord, NH on Sunday 16 February at 1:30pm. contact me for more info at mikpel at hotmail dot com

@Bigethdaddy Hi, I sent you a text message. Looking forward to playing here in NH in the near future!

@riewnoiz Hi, we play here in Manchester, NH and now in Danvers, MA. Reach me at mikpel at hot mail dot com. Mainly play the ‘new’ Global 1942 which is like the Global 1940.

@carnevale762 Hi, I didn’t get your email. You can text also.

Hi, my pal Josh and I are in southern NH and gotten to a level where we want to find some knowledgeable opponents for AA1940 or the new AA1942 Global scenario by Larry Harris (uses the same map and most rules of 1940. We are willing to travel ! Thanks mikpel at hotmail dot com or text 603 660 three four four zero

Hi, my pal Josh and I are in southern NH and gotten to a level where we want to find some knowledgeable opponents for AA1940 or the new AA1942 Global scenario by Larry Harris (uses the same map and most rules of 1940. We are willing to travel ! Thanks mikpel at hotmail dot com or text 603 660 three four four zero

Here is a unique take: while an amphibious assault takes place, the defender has a lone (and quite sad) transport in the sea zone. Can the attacker state one of his aircraft will hit the transport so the attacking battleship can bombard and support the amphibious assault? I don’t think the bombardment can take place in this case unless the ‘defending’ transport is totally ignored by air and sea. thanks

@fasthard CORRECTION: I was incorrect in my first interpretation: Here the Corrected answer please see the other replies and feedback: I am looking at page 11 of the 2nd edition of the European Rule Book for AA1940 under the topic of Unfriendly Neutrals.

@fasthard to continue on the example given above: if Germany attacks Yugo but retreats before conquering it, then the Yugo units can’t leave the territory BUT are allied. The Allies (for example, UK) could land a fighter there and then the units become controlled by the UK. Then, the next turn, if they survive (doubtful) the Yugo units are now UK and could leave the territory.

Anyone interested in AA 1940 in the NH area? I live in Manchester but can travel. Have all the game boards and some nice custom pieces, too. Mike

@krieghund But, can Japan scramble against US ships when it is ANZACs attack? That is, what if the US also put some surface warships in that sea zone in its non-combat turn- would Japan have to ‘fight’ them in the scramble or just the ANZAC ships? This is really complicated and might be not addressed by any current rules or errata. thanks (and this is mostly acedemic)

@tincanofthesea just getting back to this scenario: An empty US transport is in an Australian waters. On ANZAC’s turn, two ANZAC units (lets say INF and Arty) load up. On the US turn, non-combat, it sails to Carolina Islands that are occupied by some Japanese fighters. There are no Japanese naval assets in the waters around the Carolina Islands. There is no combat and no assault at this time. On ANZAC’s turn, the INF and Arty ‘assault’ or ‘unload’ and attack the Japanese forces on the Carolina Islands. Wow… this appears to be very unique.

Manchester NH at Sweeney Post. Public open ‘friendly’ game. https://www.meetup.com/nh-northern-ma-axis-allies-board-game-meetup-group/events/280261408/?rv=ce1&_xtd=gatlbWFpbF9jbGlja9oAJGUzZWUzMzhjLTBmMDMtNGVkNi1iY2U2LWYyOWUzOTBiZGU1OQ&_af=event&_af_eid=280261408

@panther https://media.wizards.com/2015/downloads/ah/AA_Pacific_1940_2nd_Edition_FAQ.pdf?fbclid=IwAR17m6D3_CD2nn9BSOOaX9-Ib09WeTiAQQUDrnQhCNtSCWudnhkZMpj2KLY

Here is the Errata for Axis & Allies Pacific 1940, 2nd Edition, FAQ
November 24, 2014

@krieghund two separate questions. both were answered. I am good. 1. the USA can’t get the Dutch Island bonus’ unless the island is liberated from the Japanese. 2. In AA 1940 Pacific, there is a 30 point immediate one time special bonus to USA for a Japanese unprovoked attack upon the Allies. Thanks, ,

@the_good_captain sorry, right church… wrong pew ! two separate subjects as you correctly point out.

@krieghund Hi, I am being told by another forum board member today that a so called ‘new’ errata takes away the +30 rule for the unprovoked attack by the Japanese on the Allies. But, I can’t find that alluded to new errata. Any idea if there was discussion of taking that one time special immediate bonus from the USA? thx