Topics created by Martin

@Martin our new game
https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/40120/martin-axis-vs-dawgoneit-allies-a-a-classic

Hi there,

Does anyone know how to scroll down in territory view? Once I move the mouse to the territory details, the pointer will no longer be over the territory of interest. When there are plenty of units in a territory, it is impossible for me to get the full picture, as some units might be hidden at the bottom, and I do not manage to scroll down, if you know what I mean. In short - how can I move the scroll bar without using the mouse? Please see the picture below.

Thank you in advance! :-)

Scroll bar.jpg

@Martin Thanks for the game! It was definitely a fun and challenging one.

@myygames This is EXCELLENT. You address two major issues. In the current system expert players have a disincentive to play lower level players. This should not be. Top tier players also are disincentives to play the Allies.

As stated before, top tier players should earn glory, honor, points for allowing higher bids.

I do prefer regimented bids levels. Perhaps temporarily. Adjusted by the top 5 every year. Say the first 30 are regimented.

Bids made by lower-level players are going to be less efficient. A player should be able to “opt out” at a slight penalty or by agreement.

Definitely willing to re-match later this year when you are less busy at work.

@martin sounds good to me

@martin 39

Sorry, couple of edits, was rushing to get this done. Meant to move the US CV to the channel to receive the 2 new fighters, but shift clicked the whole lot into the Med by mistake. As alsways, your choice whether to accept the edit.

Also, thought I had forgotten to pck up some UK infantry on a transport, but it was fine so undid that edit.

@martin thanks, good luck to you too and I’d love doing a rematch at some point.

Sorry haven’t been active in the league in a while, forgot about the posting thing haha

@martin Thanks for the games Martin, I’m sure we will have a chance to have more this year.

My feeling is that Germany capturing Moscow is a priority.

I’d study some games by strong players to see what they do with Japan who can be very formidable.

I’ve given up on Germany going to Persia instead of Moscow but stronger players might be able to pull it off.

Good luck in the playoffs!

Good game

Thanks for the game.

I think your g1 opening has room for improvement. Sbr on Ukraine is not advised.

Not enough units were killed.

Still, i think in general the strat has something going for it. It is similar to the cobra kai idea of siredblood i think.

Wrong name - please ignore

39403 Round 05 - Japan.tsvg

Game History

Round: 5 Purchase Units - Japanese Japanese buy 2 artilleries, 3 destroyers, 1 fighter, 3 infantry, 1 tactical_bomber and 1 transport; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 6 SuicideAttackTokens; Combat Move - Japanese 1 infantry moved from Novosibirsk to Vologda 1 fighter moved from Kansu to Vologda 2 bombers moved from Kansu to Vologda 1 armour moved from Yunnan to Shan State Japanese take Shan State from UK_Pacific 1 armour moved from Shan State to French Indo China 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Philippines to 35 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 destroyer, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 35 Sea Zone to 41 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 41 Sea Zone to Sumatra 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 35 Sea Zone to 42 Sea Zone Combat - Japanese Battle in 41 Sea Zone Japanese attack with 1 destroyer and 1 transport ANZAC defend with 1 submarine and 1 transport Japanese roll dice for 1 destroyer and 1 transport in 41 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits ANZAC roll dice for 1 submarine in 41 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0,17 expected hits Japanese roll dice for 1 destroyer and 1 transport in 41 Sea Zone, round 3 : 0/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits ANZAC roll dice for 1 submarine in 41 Sea Zone, round 3 : 1/1 hits, 0,17 expected hits 1 destroyer owned by the Japanese lost in 41 Sea Zone 1 transport owned by the Japanese retreated to 37 Sea Zone ANZAC win with 1 submarine and 1 transport remaining. Battle score for attacker is -8 Casualties for Japanese: 1 destroyer Battle in 42 Sea Zone Japanese attack with 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber ANZAC defend with 1 destroyer and 1 submarine 1 submarine owned by the ANZAC submerged Japanese roll dice for 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber in 42 Sea Zone, round 2 : 2/2 hits, 1,17 expected hits ANZAC roll dice for 1 destroyer in 42 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits 1 destroyer owned by the ANZAC lost in 42 Sea Zone Japanese win with 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 8 Casualties for ANZAC: 1 destroyer Battle in Vologda Japanese attack with 2 bombers, 1 fighter and 1 infantry Russians defend with 1 infantry Japanese roll dice for 2 bombers, 1 fighter and 1 infantry in Vologda, round 2 : 2/4 hits, 2,00 expected hits Russians roll dice for 1 infantry in Vologda, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Russians lost in Vologda Japanese win, taking Vologda from Russians with 2 bombers, 1 fighter and 1 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 3 Casualties for Russians: 1 infantry Non Combat Move - Japanese 2 bombers moved from Vologda to Suiyuyan 1 fighter moved from Vologda to Novgorod 1 aaGun moved from Yunnan to Kwangsi 1 artillery moved from Yunnan to Hunan 1 infantry moved from Hunan to Yunnan 1 infantry moved from Anhwe to Hunan 1 infantry moved from Shantung to Anhwe 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Shantung to Jehol 1 infantry moved from Suiyuyan to Kansu 1 infantry moved from Chahar to Suiyuyan 1 mech_infantry moved from Kansu to Chahar 2 fighters moved from Anhwe to Novosibirsk 1 fighter and 3 tactical_bombers moved from Anhwe to Shantung 3 carriers moved from 35 Sea Zone to 6 Sea Zone 2 fighters and 2 tactical_bombers moved from 35 Sea Zone to 6 Sea Zone 1 destroyer moved from 6 Sea Zone to 7 Sea Zone 2 battleships moved from 35 Sea Zone to 6 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Kwangtung to Kwangsi 1 transport moved from 20 Sea Zone to 19 Sea Zone 1 transport moved from 19 Sea Zone to 6 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from Japan to 6 Sea Zone 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from 6 Sea Zone to Korea 2 carriers moved from 35 Sea Zone to 6 Sea Zone 2 submarines moved from 6 Sea Zone to 35 Sea Zone 1 cruiser moved from 35 Sea Zone to 6 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from 35 Sea Zone to 6 Sea Zone 1 fighter moved from 35 Sea Zone to 6 Sea Zone 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 42 Sea Zone to Malaya Place Units - Japanese 3 destroyers, 1 fighter, 1 tactical_bomber and 1 transport placed in 6 Sea Zone 1 artillery and 1 infantry placed in Japan 1 artillery and 2 infantry placed in Shantung Turn Complete - Japanese Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 6 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 42 Sea Zone. Rolls: 1,4 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 44 Sea Zone. Rolls: 1,3 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 43 Sea Zone. Rolls: 4,2 Japanese collect 52 PUs (6 lost to blockades); end with 52 PUs Objective Japanese 6 Home Islands: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 55 PUs

Combat Hit Differential Summary :

Japanese regular : 0,17 ANZAC regular : 0,33 Russians regular : -0,33

You are right - I think it is about time to give up. Japan is no monster and Yunnan out of reach - it cannot threaten to win in the Pacific. With the Western Axis falling, the US can use all of its economic power to fight Japan. Japan can just be happy that Russia cannot build a factory in the East…

Congratulations - well and patiently played! I will post the result.

@Martin Yes Japan went too far… If you had combine Germany and Japan at the same time it could have worked. But you need all the boats in the Pacific. If you capture India, then you can entertain a Japan trip in Africa!

You were close and Germany is really strong, It’s almost impossible for the allies to beat Germany, as you have 2 major complex + Italy. But when Japan crumbles, Germany cannot do everything lol…

It was fun, I am glad I won the rematch and I will be ready for another game in the new year if you are intested.

Hope all goes well in Germany :blush:

posted your win. Another?

@martin Hi Martin, I’d be happy to play again sometime although I’d want to re-bid to see who plays what.

Danke. Das lief mies, auch mit den Bombern. Ich bin gespannt, wie du die Allierten spielst. Ich mache nochmal 2 Spiele gegen FB BM+16. Ich würde gerne das Rückspiel aufsetzen. Lass uns telefonieren… LG Harry

@Martin Same as this game please!