Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Mark the Shark
    3. Posts
    M
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 1
    • Topics 0
    • Posts 21
    • Best 2
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Mark the Shark

    • RE: Romania as it’s own team..?

      @chris_henry well I will admit I haven’t looked at them on the website since I downloaded it about 6 months ago or so…

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: Romania as it’s own team..?

      @chris_henry rules for 39 are downloadable on HBG’s website!

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: USA Peacetime Income Increases for Japanese Battleships and Carriers

      @hbg-gw-enthusiast Once when you place it on the production chart and once again when you place it on the map. You are correct in your thinking on both counts!

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: What on earth are the pieces that you need to play Global War 1936?! Like, just an actual list of useful pieces please.

      @linkler I also made use of my old 80’s axis and allies pieces for battlecruisers and coastal subs as well as risk cavalry. I denote cruisers between light and heavy with different colors of paint on the bow and stern. The possibilities are virtually endless in what you can do for units in this game. I am currently buying HBG pieces to replace certain units and or make upgrades as I can.

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: What is the best thing to do with strat bombers?

      @trig yes, you are correct I got that backwards, but the ability to transport airborne is a useful one. Though not as useful as actually doing strategic bombing or carpet bombing in my opinion.

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: What is the best thing to do with strat bombers?

      @david-06 they can also noncombat move infantry class units, which can be quite useful to reinforce a weakly defended position.

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: Version 4?

      @chris_henry totally agree!

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: Version 4?

      @david-06 that is a great thought but I imagine the logistics of doing something like that would probably drive the price up instead of down.

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: Version 4?

      @chris_henry
      The argument on the Japanese sneak attack, has been ongoing for a while now. The rule in the book states that Japanese ships can move 5 spaces when performing the sneak attack and the argument is carrier based aircraft can only move a maximum of 4 spaces according to the rules. I am paraphrasing but just trying to give you a basic understanding of the argument. In my opinion the Japanese aircraft should be allowed to participate in the sneak attack, this I believe is the spirit of the whole sneak attack scenario involving Japan. I am sure it will be straightened out soon if it has not already been and I just missed it…which sometimes happens.

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: The FAQ Thread

      @insanehoshi in answer to question one Yes.
      Question 2: you can bomb a railway to break the chain, you can also bomb a port or other naval facility to make them useless until repaired.

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: The FAQ Thread

      @insanehoshi in the scenario above Germany possessed both Hungary and Slovakia prior to the Soviet attack therefore the Soviets declared war on Germany first.

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: Europe/Pacific War 1936...

      @jon-b my suggestion would be to play through the prewar conflicts as each side a time or two. Abbisinia, Spanish Civil War, and the Chinese Civil War…throwing Japan in after a couple of turns. I believe these conflicts were placed in the game to help warm people up to the mechanics of the game and as a way for new players to get their feet wet so to speak.

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: Convoy Raiding, Convoy Escorting, and Maritime Air Patrol (MAP) in Global War 1936-1945

      @hbg-gw-enthusiast thank you very much!

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: Convoy Raiding, Convoy Escorting, and Maritime Air Patrol (MAP) in Global War 1936-1945

      @hbg-gw-enthusiast. Great informative video!

      posted in Global War 1936
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: GW36 Italian Strategy - Mare Bambino Nostrum (Our Baby Sea)

      Another great post. I really enjoy reading them. Thank you.

      posted in Global War
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: GW36 Italian Strategy - Somalian Pirate (Crouching Benito)

      Thanks for getting back to this….very interesting.

      posted in Global War
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: GW36 Italian Strategy - Somalian Pirate (Crouching Benito)

      So where is this strategy posted or is it?

      posted in Global War
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: G40 naval ideas

      Historically speaking air power should give you more bang to the buck than naval power.

      posted in House Rules
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: Returning to A&A after 30 years, advice sought (long post, sorry)

      You could always open up a new can of worms by painting the old sculpts.

      posted in Axis & Allies 1941
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • RE: Your First WWII Book

      I think Midway was the 1st 40 or so years ago.

      posted in World War II History
      M
      Mark the Shark
    • 1
    • 2
    • 1 / 2