Posts made by lexgreat

there you go

Alexgreat_Vance_1b_Russia.AAM
Alexgreat_Vance_1b_Russia.AAM

forgot ship orders…no war yet, can move through Denmark. Wait a sec

Wow, such a prayer can go a long way.

RUSSIA 1

1. PURCHASE

• 9 Inf (27)
• 1 Fig (10)

2. COMBAT MOVES

3. NON-COMBAT MOVES

Sub SZ 127 –> SZ 125
2 Inf Karelia --> Nov
3 Inf Vyborg --> Nov
Inf Arch --> Nov
Inf E-Poland --> Baltics
AA Nov --> Baltics
Inf Belarus --> Novgorod
Inf Bess --> N-Ukr
3 Inf S-Ukr --> N-Ukr
Inf Caucasus --> Kaz
Arm, Mech, Inf, Art, AA Volgo --> Bryansk
Figh, Tac Rus --> Nov
Arm, Mech Rus --> Bryansk
6 Inf, 2 AA Sakh --> Bur
2 Inf Amur --> Sib
3 Inf Amur --> Sakh

4. MOBILIZATION

Fig, 3 Inf Nov
3 Inf S-Ukr
3 Inf Russia

5. INCOME

37 (terr)

Alexgreat_Vance_1b_Russia.AAM

no other reaction than a silent prayer.

Agree, Moscow would have taken awfully long. But holding Novgorod and the original border for some time while Japan mounts up the pressure would have helped (takes long, though). Of course I’d have expected a US European invasion, and with time you’d be successful there. Dont really know who would have been faster. But with Scandinavia out of your control my income vs. yours would have shifted in my favor for some time + Japanese.

As for the Pacific and the US, hard to say. Divide US resources and landings in Europe are more difficult. Your Alaska fleet would not have survived, one way or another.
Concentrate in Europe and over some turns Alaska, Hawaii would fall, with a small carrier group each protecting India and the Philippines / DEIs.

I really wonder about China, have no idea how to handle those from an Allies perspective.

So happy to start a new one, new set-up, without tech (although, naturally, with the US I would have loved to use it). Have only played allies once, just UK back then, hope I can put up a challenge.

Thx again for responding and giving me my first game here, Vance.

I have some time off in the afternoon / evening (local time), if you want to start Germany before that.

map

Vance_AlexGreat_7c_Jap.AAM

I know. And you placed the fleet well.

Had I not made the breakthrough, I would have attacked SZ 8 with my ships and 6 fighters, taken Aleutian Islands, fortified Siberia with more infantry via transports, built an airbase in Siberia and landed air there, blocked SZ 4 with one ship and built one or two carriers for 2-4 more air to land in an adjacent sea zone wherever the sea battle would have been (in case you would not have attacked me), SZ 2, 1, 3, 8 or 4. Sure you would have built an airbase and scrambler in case of staying defensive.

Point is, all my air would have been able to land on Aleutians in an attack. In case you attacked you had lesser combat values, in case I would have attacked I had the subs and more air in range by then.

All in all I think I would have won this particular battle. But it would have been bloodier I guess. And above all this, I consider you the winner of this game from the moment you allowed my TTs to live in G3.

Pls forgive me for not typing the Non combats, I attach the map, I dont think I made a mistake. Pls feel free to check!! Its past 2 am again…

Re tech I am ambivalent. I too think it can distort the game, but usually in favour of allies as I as axis seem not be able to invest as much (mainly this exp comes from earlier versions of AA). But on the other hand it adds flavour and everyone is free to use it, if both agree. may playgroup likes national advantages as well, talk about skewing…

MOBILIZATION:

2 Fig Japan
MIC … oh dear, I just realize I cant do that as Philippines is an island, right? --> Need to think about this tomorrow, but would be fair to build somewhere now that I bought it and know the combat results of this turn).

3 Mech FIC
2 Mech India
3 Inf Manchuria
1 Inf Japan

INCOME

60 (terr) + 10 (NO) = 70

damn
A
Rolls: 10@4; Total Hits: 610@4: (6, 5, 2, 4, 4, 5, 6, 1, 1, 2)
D
Rolls: 3@4; Total Hits: 13@4: (6, 3, 5)

SZ 3
A
Input ErrorThere was an error in your dice throw: "/>Daaa 3@4:

its the fish diet, good for the brain. Cant seem to stop them from inventing (happy to play the next game with the new setup without research).

The dice do not favor you in those sea battles.

Pls allocate 11 hits, Vance.

what you say makes sense.

SZ 3
A
Rolls: 13@4 1@3; Total Hits: 1113@4: (4, 5, 4, 4, 1, 1, 3, 2, 1, 5, 4, 1, 1)1@3: (5)
D
Rolls: 5@4 3@3 3@2; Total Hits: 45@4: (2, 4, 6, 6, 3)3@3: (2, 4, 6)3@2: (3, 4, 5)

SZ 8
A
Rolls: 2@4 1@3 10@2; Total Hits: 42@4: (2, 3)1@3: (2)10@2: (6, 6, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 5, 6, 3)
D
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)

Yenisey
A
Rolls: 2@3 2@2 1@1; Total Hits: 22@3: (6, 1)2@2: (3, 1)1@1: (2)
D
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)

Szechwan
A
Rolls: 1@4 1@3 1@1; Total Hits: 11@4: (3)1@3: (5)1@1: (6)
D
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (2)

well, that is long range aircraft and jet fighter.

2. PURCHASE

• 5 Mech (20)
• 4 Inf (12)
• MIC (12)
• 2 Fighter (20)

3. COMBAT MOVES

SZ 3 <– 1 TAC Manchuria, 1 Fig, 2 Tac Korea, 2 Fig, 1 Tac Japan, 1 Bomber, 3 Fig, 3 Tac SZ6
Fleet SZ 6 + 2 Inf Japan --> SZ 8 and taking Aleutian Islands
Arm Central Mon blitzes Sui + Kan
Yenisey <-- 2 Inf, Art, 2 Arm, blitzing Dzahan
Szechwan <-- Tac (India), Arm, Mech (yunan)

reroll for the “3”.

Rolls: 5@1; Total Hits: 05@1: (2, 5, 6, 5, 6)

Rolling 1d6:
(3)  
Rolling 1d6:
(2)

2 breakthroughs, discarding all tokens, rolling on table 2.

Input ErrorThere was an error in your dice throw: “1d6” is not correct syntax.

Input ErrorThere was an error in your dice throw: “1d6” is not correct syntax.

oh ok, another thing I read differently in the rules. There it says “can submerge anytime it would otherwise roll the die to fire”. As the attacking sub would roll first, you could not submerge until shot at first. And it kind of makes the surprise strike capability useless. Even against a sub another sub should be able to sneak in…as it clearly can because if you dont submerge, you would be an eligible target for surprise attack. Not logical, but if it thats the rule, ok.

JAPAN 7

1. R&D

Buy one more ($5) for total of 6.

Rolling 6d6:
(3, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6)

6. INCOME

43 (terr) - 3 (convoy) = 40

Speaking of this sub, I am afraid I never rolled for it. We can calculate an average and subtract it.

Vance_AlexGreat_7a_Germany.AAM

Sub Convoy Damage

Rolling 2d6:
(3, 5)

MOBILIZATION

TT SZ 113
4 Inf, 2 Mech Germany

true enough….but after Berlin they deserved nothing better  :wink:

Subs
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)