SZ26 Rnd4
1 BB 8 Ftr = 28
Dead
Vs
1 dBB
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 01@4: (6)
Posts made by Krychek
-
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
-
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
SZ26 Rnd3
3 DD 2 Cru 2 BB 8 Ftr = 44
7 Hits + 1@2
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
Vs
2 BB 7 Ftr = 36
6 Hits -
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
Rnd1 Stays the same
11 Hits
Vs
11 HitsSZ26 Rnd2
3 SS 10 DD 2 Cru 2 BB 8 Ftr = 64
10 Hits + 1@4
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 01@4: (5)
Vs
1 DD 2 Cru 2 BB 4 AC 7 Ftr 3 Tbmb = 61
10 Hits + 1@1
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (2) -
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
Lol I’m so dumb I see now the fuck I removed myself way too much stuff After Round 1, hahaha… I removed 4 ACS Which is 8 Hits, + 2 Bb Hits, + 4 SS, + 1 dd which is 15 hits lol
-
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
This is nonsense can you check the fight back please I had simemd like 3 times and was victorious with some stuff left lol. I must have done something wrong. yourself you simmed my victory.
-
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
I thought I had a mistake tho I simmed 3 times and you did also predict I would own the Szoen with 2 damaged Bship, In the rage of my hoh hot @5 I deleetd my Bships for last round, lol.
Taking Rnd3 Again, should be
2 BB 3 Ftr = 17
2 Hits + 1@5 (I got 3 so I hit)
Vs
2 BB 3 Ftr and you got 2 so you still get the hitIt only changes that I do last round with 1 BB
So basicly no changes in the result of Rnd3…
Rnd4
1 Damaged BB
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 01@4: (5)
Vs
2 DBB
1 Hits + -
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
Fucking ridiculous rng
SZ26 Rnd3
5 Ftr = 15
2 Hits + 1@3
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3)
Vs
2 BB 3 Ftr = 20
3 Hits + 1@2
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2) -
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
Since I keep going loss order doesnt matter as bot hdifferent unit will defend @3 in this case
SZ26 Rnd3
1 Cru 2 BB 8 Ftr = 35
5 Hits + 1@5
Rolls: 1@5; Total Hits: 01@5: (6)
Vs
2 BB 7 Ftr 1 Tbmb = 39
6 Hits + 1@3
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 01@3: (5) -
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
What will be your 9 hits?
1 DD 2 Cru 4 AC 2 Tbmb (You can either keep 1 Tbmb ou 1 Cru, they both will defend @3 for the last round, doesnt change much)
-
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
SZ26 Rnd2
9 DD 2 Cru 2 BB 8 Ftr = 56
9 Hits + 1@2
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
Vs
1 DD 2 Cru 2 BB 4 AC 7 Ftr 3 Tbmb = 61
10 Hits + 1@1
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (5) -
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
I will wait your confirmation for the last round, as this round shouldnt matter, you’re only losing stuff tha tdefends @2 and still has stuff that defends @2.
Assuming you take 4 Hits on ACs, 2 Hits on BB, 4 SS and 1 DD ? -
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
Doing the other CMs after this epic one.
SZ26 Rnd1
4 SS 10 DD 2 Cru 2 BB 4 AC 8 Ftr = 66
11 Hits
Vs
4 SS 2 DD 2 Cru 2 BB 4 AC 7 Ftr 3 Tbmb = 67
11 Hits + 1@1
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (2) -
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
Exellent! As predicted!
-
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
you got me confused, yes or no, lol
-
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
Well there we go… let’s see how this goes lol
United States 10
Purchases
Wus: 4 AC 3 Inf 1 Rtl = 77 IPCs
Cus:
Eus:
Wfr:
Sfr:= 77 IPCs, save 1
CMs
Smb Ger
1 Sbmb Wfr to GerSZ26
4 SS 10 DD 2 Cru 2 BB 4 AC 8 Ftr to SZ26Hol
2 Inf Wfr to Hol
2 Ftr 1 Tbmb SZ110 to HolFra
All Stuff Wfr and Sfr to Fra (Exept 2 Inf stay Sfr)
France Liberated! Placing 1 Sbmb on Fra.Scramble orders for SZ26?
-
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
We’ll see :)
This is the hell of a turn, thinking about many things. Will eventually come !
-
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
Playing my turn tonight after job
-
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
I’m gonna do it and you’ll see what happens, I don’t need to hold my carriers casualties at all. All I need is a viable POSSIBLE landing zone at the moment of the attack, which bringing 4 AC does. The attacker may chose to take ACs as casualties even if the possibility then exisst that fighters may not have a landing zone, since the rule only applys to be able to lunch an attack, not to determinate the order of loss once it has started. I wil lchose my AC firsts and I’m buying 2 ACs anyways to bring 4 planes back.
-
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
If you are taking that much time to go through that it means it would piss you off lol
-
RE: Jennifer (Axis) vs Krychek (Allies) Second Theory Test Gameposted in Play Boardgames
What if I cut your supply line with a destroyer ?! Lol