Keep me updated!

Yeah I am going to have to agree with SUD on this one. Always keep the threat alive with Japan but doing it is completely a different story.

Looks like Moses has a good handle on the
situation……

WHAT…?

Man you have missed something. WHat happens when your enemy desides to move all of his forces to Moscow. Then the British and the US send all fighters to Russia for defence.
Your strat has failed because you are simply trying to take russia out imediately which is impossible against a solid enemy. With the US you can purchase 3 fighters the 1st round and with Britain you can get two. If you play it out right you can have 10 fighters in Moscow with many Russian Inf.
This means you are good for one and only one attack your supply lines are stretched and extremely thin. Worse yet when you engage the odds are completely in your enemy’s favor. Plain and simple you’ll get
ROCKED!!!

Since we are discussing America, What do you

all think about the US using Canada as a land

Bridge?

The main difference that I noticed was in the infantry’s ability to attack. It seems as though the infantry on the cd version hit a lot more than on the board version when attacking. Does anyone else see this?

Maybe this was already mentioned but I find
the actual board to be completely different
than the CD version. THis could also change
your perspective on the game being equal/fair. What does everyone else think about that.

Sud, I am willing to work with you on these
issues. If you and Yanny are going to set
something up I will be glad to shed some
light and I agree that some of those strategies are BAD. I find myself completely ignoring the bad ones maybe I shouldn’t for the better of this site as you pointed out. Maybe we could talk about the importance of holding a territory. Many Newbies take a territory but seem to be confused about securing it. They may not even understand the importance of it. I guess we could start something that is rather basic and as we chat get more detailed. I think that this would work because newbies could throughly understand the basics and be able to adapt to more specifics.

What do you all think about this?

We could get a lot more in-depth. I think

Sud has a point here. However, I am not
offended by the rookies that come on to this
forum. They get excieted about the game and
therefor could turn out to be long term players. All in all they might help spread the word about the game making it more enjoyable for everyone.

Good point BOSSK!