Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. katfishkris
    3. Posts
    0%
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 28
    • Posts 210
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by katfishkris

    • Scramble question

      can planes scramble from an island with an airport against sub attacks if there is no destroyer in the zone being attacked?
      ie
      4jap ftrs in borneo, with an airbase; 1cv 1ftr 1tac 1bb in z43

      anzac attacks z43 with 1ss z35, 1ss z36, 1ss z37, 1ss z45, 1ss z42

      if anzac bring a ftr along to attack z43, could the jap ftrs could scramble then?

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: Neutrals Declare War

      @dakgoalie38:

      @Imperious:

      I want not only neutrals to declare war, but allow rules for Godzilla and other monsters to have the ability to start destroying the players armies. This is only consistent with historical reality.

      Giant cats have defeated many an army in the other Axis and Allies games I’ve played.

      the tail of golden retriever has ended many of my games.  i feel the pain of large household pets destroying the world.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: Kamikazes for Japan, what for Germany???

      yes i have heard that.  and they had a “name”  too. cant remember what though

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: Counting zones for aircraft movement

      cool.  tech to upgrade to new units.  any date on aae40 yet?  still ‘summer’ ?

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: AAP40 map for Abattlemap?

      module looks great.  very nice work.  thank you.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: New National Production & National Objectives Chart

      man this looks great.  i am going to try printing it off and getting it laminated.  thank you.  looking forward to others.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: Disapointed

      i fish alot.  and i have a wife and kids.  i have gotten pretty good at waiting.  :-D

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: Two questions/clarifications, hopefully for the FAQ, and a comment on negativity

      +1 purplebaron, amen brother.

      and also, i am kind of tired of the whole “chimps” thing.  i am not an apologist, but calling names never got anyone anywhere.  :|

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: Disapointed

      i too have sent them an email regarding these problems.  i guess we wait and see.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: The dutch

      @brazcons:

      I’m not sure the UK, US or ANZAC should get the Dutch income by just landing troops there.  Or at least it should cause a declaration of war against Japan.

      It seems like awarding the IPCs to the “Allied” powers without much effort on their part significantly skews the outcome given the IPCs awarded.  I could live with it if the rule was that they only get the income if they take the Dutch territories back after Japan has first taken the island(s).

      thats what i thought it should be.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • The dutch

      if UK or ANZAC moves troops to a dutch tt, do they(UK or ANZAC) take the income?  or does jap have to take it first, then allies take it?

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: Political question

      ty dinosaur.

      as far as who is John Galt, i am not sure.  But, he has his own boulevard here in Omaha.  :-D

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: Disapointed

      jeez, now i am kinda disapointed i started this thread.  so much negativity and hostility fellas.  i have now set up the game and really looked at the pieces, nice detail on some of them.  just wish i had more tac bmr for jap.  cant wait to play it out and see how it goes.  love the new bases and extra movement they give.  very strategic.

      is there somewhere i can email to get the actual battle board?  maybe if i ask nicely, they can send me a few more jap tac bmrs too.  :-D

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • Political question

      sorry if this has been answered before, but it is difficult to sort through all the negative hogwash to find answers.

      can UK and ANZAC attack Japan on UK1/Anzac1 if they choose to?  or do they have to wait to be attacked?

      and if jap doesnt attack any allies does US HAVE to wait till US3 to attack Jap?

      just trying to get a handle on the basics.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: Where do you live?

      love the nederlands!!!  your country should be a role model to all.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: Disapointed

      the separation between the two boards can be dealt with, AA50 came in 3 pieces, but some heavy duty gorilla tape can fix that.  i do not recomend it though, just keep pieces away from the fault lines.  :-D

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: Disapointed

      lol, nice way to look at it.  thanks gar

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • Disapointed

      just got aap40 saturday.  i have been very excited to get and play it.  i have read all the posts here and mostly tried to ignore the negativity(sometimes people just btch to btch),  but after opening and inspecting, i got say i feel mostly disapointed with the game.  mind you i havent played yet, but it feels cheap.  the cardboard is not the nice laminated cardboard of aa50.  the mech inf look smooshed.  the dice are ugly but i can grow to like ugly if they roll well.  the board itself is ok, but still not the nice cardboard of aa50.  the boxes are a good idea but is a chinese box for 16inf really necessary?  i miss the cardboard covers to each box.  the battle box and casualty zone aren’t even connected, though i never use them, but still.  i dont know, i guess i am glad i only paid $68 instead of the $90 some people are paying.  i guess i was looking for more of an aa50 type product.  hopefully it plays well.  i now expect aae40 to be the same type of product, cuz really how could it be of better quality when sitting next this cheaper crap on the same table come next fall?  guess i could always incorporate some of the aa50 game to this one but i dont think i should have to.  i can understand the no paper money thing, but all in all…sadly disapointed.  thanks for reading and putting up with my rant.  i hope it plays better than it looks and feels.  maybe it just another of those great ideas put together shoddily.  oh well.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: SIGN OFF HERE WHEN YOU GET YOUR COPY!

      got mine from local game shop here in omaha.  $90 but all board games were 30% off.  $67 all said and done.  recieved it for christmas.  killed me waiting a week for it.  will play tomorrow.

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • RE: A few thoughts after one play

      +1 to func, mwindianapolis, woodstock, and general chang.

      nicely said.  i like the idea of painting some of my older planes to make them tac bombers.

      i will not -1 to razor.  sometimes he cracks me up. :-D

      posted in Axis & Allies Pacific 1940
      katfishkrisK
      katfishkris
    • 1 / 1