USA - 76 IPCs
PURCHASES
-1 minor (12)
-8 inf., 4 art., 4 tanks (64)
ATTACKS
-1 tank takes PHI
-1 inf. takes JAVA
-1 dd, HK planes vs. sz20
-Spain vs. Normandy
-1 art takes SS
SZ20
Rolls: 4@4; Total Hits: 34@4: (4, 4, 3, 6)
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (2)
NORMANDY
Rolls: 12@2; Total Hits: 612@2: (1, 2, 1, 5, 4, 4, 1, 5, 2, 3, 5, 2)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
RUSSIA - 17 IPCs
PURCHASES
-3 inf., 2 art. (17)
ATTACKS
-1 inf. takes Rostov
NC
-1 inf. from SMO to Bry
-stack to Tambov
-1 inf. to VOL
-Yunnan units to SZE
PLACE
-Moscow
COLLECTS
19 - 3 = 16 IPCs
Ouch.
NC
-1 f. to HK
-sub to sz42, dd to US fleet
PLACE
-NSW
COLLECTS
7 + 10 = 17 IPCs
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 22@2: (2, 1)
ANZAC - 17 IPCs
PURCHASES
-1 f.
-save 7
ATTACKS
-1 inf., 1 art., 1 sb vs. NBr
Rolls: 2@2 1@3; Total Hits: 02@2: (6, 5)1@3: (6)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (5, 2)
Not bombards, SBR’s… so if you send 6 or more at the GIB nb, the fighters stand down.
Okay, so 82 - 6 = 76 IPCs for the US. With regards to sz35, just put the dd back on the map and stick my 2 subs with the rest of the fleet. Sorry.
(BTW, yes, those planes are in GIB specifically to defend bombards, so long as you send 5 or less planes to bombard with).
China collects 19 IPCs.
UK Europe - 33 IPCs
PURCHASES
-1 damage
-3 inf. (9)
-4 art. (16)
-save 7
ATTACKS
-tank blitz takes Algeria
NC
-GIB land units, Morocco tacs to Spain
-2 f. to GIB
-BB joins rest of navy
-tac. from Malaya to Anhwe
COLLECTS
7 + 16 = 23 IPCs
Actually, wait… is China susceptible to convoy raids?
If so…
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (2)
NC
-2 transports, 1 inf. (Morocco) activate Brazil
-4 inf., 4 art. (Morocco) get on British transports
-6 transports back to EUS
-2 bombers to Morocco
-2 aa’s to WUS
-Navy consolidates off FIC coast
-1 “air pair” lands on a carrier, rest of SE Asian air to HK
-2 bombers land in Malaya
-rest on map
PLACE
-1 dd off of HK coast
-3 tanks, 1 art., 5 inf. in CUS
-1 f. in WUS, 1 in HK
-1 inf. in HK
-1 art. in WUS
-1 inf., 1 art. in Malaya
COLLECTS
82 IPCs
China - 18 IPCs (6 inf.)
-1 inf. takes SIK, 1 takes SUI
-NC and place to/in ANHWE
COLLECTS
21 IPCs
It’s simple, yet a bit more sensical than what we have now: In any turn you wish to attack strict neutrals, you have the option of “buying off” any remaining ones so that they stay neutral.
Case in point: Germany wishes to attack Sweden, but obviously doesn’t want to turn Spain or Turkey against them. To keep them as strict neutrals, Germany must pay 2 + 2 (the IPC values of each territory).
If it wants to include Afg. and Saudi Arabia, then 2 + 2 + 2 + (say a min of 1 IPC, for those territories with no IPC values).
These territories would also stay strictly neutral in the event of an Allied attack (although perhaps that can be debatable). Also, the IPC costs themselves: perhaps double the tt value would be better, but those are, of course, details.
Thoughts?
Max damage for India (6 is the lowest possible).
SPAIN
Rolls: 2@1 12@2 5@3 4@4; Total Hits: 82@1: (5, 1)12@2: (3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 1, 6, 3, 5, 6, 2, 6)5@3: (4, 1, 4, 3, 5)4@4: (2, 5, 4, 6)
Rolls: 6@2; Total Hits: 16@2: (5, 6, 2, 6, 6, 5)
INDIA AA
Rolls: 2@1; Total Hits: 02@1: (5, 2)
USA - 80 IPCs
PURCHASES
-3 art., 1 tank, 4 inf. (26)
-3 inf. (9)
-5 damage (HK), 1 dd (13)
-2 f. (20)
-2 tanks (12)
ATTACKS
-GIB units, ac air and 2 bombers, 2 inf. 2 art. from Canada, EUS units vs… SPAIN!!!
-2 bombers strat. bomb India
-1 sub sinks Italian transports
-3 tanks take FIC
-3 “air pairs” vs. Siam, 2 “air pairs” vs. SS
-Bury tac. vs. YUK inf.
-2 subs vs. sz35
SZ35
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (3, 1)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)
YAK (ttd)
Rolls: 10@3; Total Hits: 410@3: (4, 2, 6, 6, 6, 3, 6, 5, 1, 1)
Rolls: 10@2; Total Hits: 410@2: (1, 2, 3, 1, 4, 4, 2, 3, 3, 6)
SIAM
Rolls: 3@3 3@4; Total Hits: 43@3: (2, 2, 1)3@4: (2, 6, 5)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (6, 6)
SS
Rolls: 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 12@3: (2, 6)2@4: (5, 6)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
It’s simple, yet a bit more sensical than what we have now: In any turn you wish to attack strict neutrals, you have the option of “buying off” any remaining ones so that they stay neutral.
Case in point: Germany wishes to attack Sweden, but obviously doesn’t want to turn Spain or Turkey against them. To keep them as strict neutrals, Germany must pay 2 + 2 (the IPC values of each territory).
If it wants to include Afg. and Saudi Arabia, then 2 + 2 + 2 + (say a min of 1 IPC, for those territories with no IPC values).
These territories would also stay strictly neutral in the event of an Allied attack (although perhaps that can be debatable). Also, the IPC costs themselves: perhaps double the tt value would be better, but those are, of course, details.
Thoughts?
NC
-planes back to Moscow
-Moscow units to Tambov
-23 inf., 2 art. to Tambov
PLACE
Moscow
COLLECTS
20
ANZAC - 30 IPCs
PURCHASES
-1 art, 1 transport, 1 cruiser
-save 7
NC
-dd, f. to Malaya
-sub to FIC
PLACE
-NSW
COLLECTS
17
RUSSIA - 27 IPCs
PURCHASES
-9 inf.
ATTACKS
-1 inf. takes NOVO
-blitzing tank takes BEL
-1 inf., 1 f., 1 tac. vs. SUk
-2 inf., 1 f. vs. SMO
-17 inf. take Yunnan
SMO
Rolls: 2@1 1@3; Total Hits: 12@1: (5, 5)1@3: (3)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
SUk
Rolls: 1@1 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@1: (4)1@3: (6)1@4: (3)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)
Forgotten British NC: KWE tac. goes to Malaya. Thank you.
NC
-sz118 units to the Canadian coast
-Normandy units to GIB
-1 sub from sz42 to India; 1 sub from sz35 to sz42
-all reaching air to Malaya
-rest on map
PLACE
-3 tanks in Malaya, IC in HK, everything else EUS
COLLECTS
80 IPCs
CHINA
-1 inf. takes SZE, everything else (and placements) to HOP
COLLECTS
18
UK - 15 IPCs
PURCHASES
-save 15
ATTACKS
-1 inf. takes H/B
NC
-1 inf., 1 art. (London) to GIB
-1 tank, 4 inf., 1 aa (Normandy & London) to Morocco
-3 f. (Normandy) to GIB
-2 tac. (NOR), 2 f. (London) to Morocco
-Navy to GIB
-BB to cdn. coast
COLLECTS
15 + 18 = 33 IPCs