Topics created by Jennifer

Unstickied.

Just use the 2013 thread.

Collect: 51 + 5 India = 56 IPC +2 Saved = 58 IPC

Overspent with the submarine, so scratch it leaving 2 IPC left over.

JMite_v_Jenn_13_05_Cjapan.AAM

GHR2:  USSR
NOLL:  USA/CHINA
JENN:  UK-E, UK-P, ANZAC, FRANCE

And yes, I’d love to play a game where all I have to do is have fun.  I don’t have to win, I don’t have to prove a theory, I don’t have to do anything but have fun.

SNAFU on the map, was missing the AA Gun from Manchuria and Japan’s Mechanized Infantry…

Build 3 Transports in SZ 6

Collect: 10 FIC, 30 TT, 5 Saved = 45 IPC

01_Canuck_v_Jennifer_01_Cjapan.AAM

I’m up for this if you still need an opponent.

LEAGUE IS NOW CLOSED.

I will post the matchups in this thread, later today.

Good luck!

NOTE: 2013 League games may now start.  Results thread is here: http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=28938.new#new

Oz,

Does that include Brazil?

I’d liked to have had more thought on the NOs as well.  They’re too vanilla.  There could have been some NOs for never losing certain territories (when you lose the NO, it’s GONE FOREVER) which could simulate lack of combat damage to factories, etc.  NOs for complete domination of entire continents (easy to snipe, if you can field a navy!)

Russia’s NO should be if they control territories back to China, they get free infantry - instead of cash.

Maybe none of that, but there certainly could have been more thought put into it.  Feels like half a game too me.  IMHO anyway.

Time for US, China, UK and Anzac to do some dammage!

Yea, is what I said.  Your turn to play the Axis, so I was waiting for you to PM me a game thread so I could issue my scramble orders. ^_^

If you need a map I am attaching the latest map (for unit start positions.)

Alpha 3.AAM

8 day bump

@fighter:

The way I read the scrambling rules there is not a cap of three fighter scrambling into a sea zone-only a cap of three fighters scrambling from any one airbase.For example if the Japs have an airbase in Korea they would be able to scramble 3ftrs each from Korea and Japan for a total of 6 fighters to one sea zone. Am I wrong?

Why are we posting this in a game thread?

Please take it to the FAQ / Rules threads.  Let old game threads die off or keep the active ones uncluttered, please.

Winner Game 1 vs Winner Game 2
Winner Game 3 vs Winner Game 4

As if you all couldnt find the pattern. ^_~

When games are finished, contact your opponents and send me your bids, please.

try not to use the B-word, could get you flagged as a spammer…others have had that problem anyway.

Let’s move on to A3.  Looks like things are slightly different enough to alter tactics significantly…

@Sid:

France offered to hold their action so that Germany could go immediately, thus allowing Italy and Germany to coordinate more fluidly, instead of interrupting to state they were doing nothing and causing a multiple day delay between Italy and Germany.

If the players agreed to the change in order, the agreement should stand.  Why should the Axis assume France would not make the attack if the order has been changed.  Have the online moves been being submitted as if France was going in it’s original order?

It was not an agreement that the turn order was different.  That would have constituted a house rule and why would France give up the right to screw up the Axis plan forevermore in perpetuity?  No, it was a contingent offer that if Italy did nothing to instigate an attack by France, then Germany could be allowed to move so as not to slow down the game.

Saturday September 3rd.

@Cmdr:

But you wont get Washington.

For one, there’s already units in the US, all of which can be in DC if need be.  There’s the British in Canada.  British ships to block the way, American ships to prevent the landing from ever happening too. (6 Aircraft already on hand, what’s it cost to put 3 carriers in the water to add all those fighters too?  48 IPC?  Leaving what, 22 IPC?  Another 2 fighters for scrambing!)

You will have the effect of pulling all the Americans out of the Pacific for a round, however.  If that is your goal.

True, it could be prevented, bringing your turn 4 fleet to sz 89 (G.O.Mexico) which puts it 2 turns from Hawaii, or the W. Coast, with those carriers in the East coast, I just prevented a build in the west coast. Those carriers will be 2 turns from Hawaii if they go that way. Seems like it would be a major disruption for a planned USA Pacific first approach, buy Japan 2 additional worry free turns, and even permit the sacking of Either India or Australia before the US could thwart them.

All this by simply sliding a few boats already in the water to another spot in the water. True, It would buy Russia 2 turns as well as my transports would be out of position…but given that Pacific first is your favored approach, taking your attention from the Pacific seems warranted.