Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Jennifer
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 6
    • Topics 331
    • Posts 17,542
    • Best 7
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 6

    Posts made by Jennifer

    • RE: Should Japan attack Pearl on first turn?

      Mr. AgentSmith:

      I think you got the wrong impression of my arguement. Other then the bidding aspect anyway, which you got right on. What I was trying to do was point out both the pro’s and con’s to attacking Pearl on the first round.

      As for saving the sub, I have to admit, that was something I never thought to do. What I am more worried about, as the Jap player, is allowing the US to have a carrier and BB in the Atlantic. Germany has a big enough headache without having to worry about a BB and AC w/2 fighters defending US transports and an AC w/2 fighters defending British Transports. After all, there is only so much you can dump into fighters to attack enemy fleets w/o the USSR crushing you.

      Just my opinion. For the record, however, I always, ALWAYS attack Pearl. My BB’s and Sub arn’t doing anything else anyway (especially in USSR Rest. games) and if I loose a BB and/or the sub, it isnt a big deal.

      If you can force the US to blow 18 of those 36 starter IPCs on a new carrier, that’s 2 of 4 possible transports s/he can’t buy.

      posted in Axis & Allies Classic
      JenniferJ
      Jennifer
    • RE: Should Japan attack Pearl on first turn?

      Excuse my ignorance here, but I think mixing any bidding into the debate would be rather unwise. Mostly because the bidding is too dynamic to contribute to the debate.

      There are good and bad points to attacking Hawaii’s fleet. First the bad:

      You could loose valuable ships you’ll need later.
      You might need the aircraft you assign to the fleet there for a mainland attack.
      You might loose your battle-boats if the US counter attacks with aircraft and has lucky rolls in the defense of it’s fleet.

      On the plus side:

      You arn’t going to be using those Battle-boats for anything else, anyway. Admit it, most Russian players pull their forces away from the Far East to assist in creating an Eastern Defensive Line (7 Inf. 1 Armor.)

      The carrier just makes good fodder.

      You can still pull all your fighters in to assist on the mainland attack.

      Odds are the Far East is a walk in.

      What in the world were you going to do with that submarine in the solomn’s anyway?

      I guess I’m saying I always take the attack against the Carrier Group in Hawaii because I think the Japanese fleet should be utilized.

      If you let the US Fleet survive they MIGHT, if they don’t know any better, try to build a fleet to take you out. However, most players I know will just add the extra fighter, sub and carrier to the battle-boat and transport on their way over to the east coast…making it all that much harder on Germany.

      posted in Axis & Allies Classic
      JenniferJ
      Jennifer
    • 1 / 1