Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. jeffdestroyer
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 9
    • Posts 251
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by jeffdestroyer

    • RE: Air can't attack subs rule?

      the air vs sub rules are starting to make more sense since subs do not have control of a sea zone.  I just wish it was pointed out in the rules more clearly.

      ie fig could clear out the surface ships to allow TR to pass safely to another sz even though subs are there.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: Suggestions for Germany?

      What about a factory in France?  Building only 10 units is tough on Germany.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: China - infantry numbers and national objectives question

      I assume any other allied units would also count towards the 3 when placing Chinese INF.  Is this correct?

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: China Fighter

      Japan could leave the TR unprotected for a turn since the China Fig can not attack it and no one else can either.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: Air can't attack subs rule?

      Rules for the DD state that a fig can attack if it is present. 
      It does not say that Fig can not defend.

      Fig either defend or option #1 above is correct.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: Difference Between Ships

      The USA CA and DD are the only ones that I mix up when looking for a piece to place.  The other major nations are fine.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: China Fighter

      The reason I brought this up is because the rules state that Chinese units have a limited range of occupation,  but…
      An attacking fighter by itself can not occupy…only attack 
      ie a lone Jap TR in sz 61.   :evil:
      The Chinese fig would still land back in China

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: Air can't attack subs rule?

      I guess in the end, it will create different opportunities. 
      You may not want to send a DD into the battle in order to focus on more important capital ships.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: Painting Techniques for 15mm Infantry, 1/285 Micro Armor and 1/2400 Navy Metals/

      Where do you purchase your micro decals?

      posted in Miniatures Painting & Modeling
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: AA50 Bias

      I have seen a Japan factory in Burma and Incochina as well. We will see how it plays out.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: Air can't attack subs rule?

      I thought the new rule was designed so Aircraft could not kill subs by themselves. 
      The defending player should allways be able to choose subs instead of other surface ships in a mixed fleet if they do not submerge.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: Battlemap for aa50?

      Flames of Europe AA50. The file must be edited.  Many of the unit placements are incorrect.

      http://www.flames-of-europe.de/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=viewdownload&cid=2

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • China Fighter

      Can the China Fighter attack outside of China on its own.  ie Burma? or a nearby sea zone.
      I realize that the the China INF can not leave.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: Game design review

      I started using quality poker chips instead of the currency provided.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: Keeping the board(s) together

      After I print out a larger map, I will use a thin sheet of plexi glass from the hardware store to cover everything and keep the map down.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: Quality of the units

      Quality seems to be the same.  Germans seem to be darker.
      I have 3 sets of Revised units as well. 
      I now have 3 different shades of German pcs.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: German AA50 -41 strategy

      I like that German attack except I would bring a tank and Inf on the TR to Egypt instead of two Inf. 
      I really don’t want the UK fig to survive.  He would kill the Ger. TR and fly to India.

      posted in 1941 Scenario
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: IC in india?

      A turn 1 UK factory build will need to be defended with a lot of units from Egypt or TransJordan using the TR in order not to be taken by Jap2.  It looks like it could be tough and thus a weak Africa.

      posted in 1941 Scenario
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: News flash: AXIS & ALLIES ANNIVERSARY EDITION due out oct 23 08

      Any thought of keeping a force of UK troops in Finland as future Soviet support in order not to lose the N.O IPC’s.

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • RE: The Map is fine, but…

      I enjoy using your maps Imperious.  Did you upload AA50 updated today?

      posted in Axis & Allies Anniversary Edition
      jeffdestroyerJ
      jeffdestroyer
    • 1 / 1