i think that india ipc is just another reason for japan to defend russia but i agree gb cant hold against japan if that happens
Posts made by italiansarecoming
-
RE: IC in india?posted in 1941 Scenario
-
RE: Always win with Russiaposted in Axis & Allies Europe
i just got the game but played out senarios many times and found out if u skip east poland as germany
the russian player can keep 1 inf. there and retreat the rest and make that 1 inf as a blockade? sound good to you guys if they dotn attak there 1st -
RE: IC in india?posted in 1941 Scenario
sorry made a mistake i meant if india loses russia and japan fight and western allies v germany while italy most likely will only go for afirka quit fast since(well i would send men to balkanz) go for afirka aginst higher gb which will b weaker and so will ussr india can b lost but in the proper way aka let them have it and defend afrika italy wont be abl to grab it if u wont allow them ( tip when in afrika and asia dont make both ipcs once stick 2 1 of them also australia ipc horrible idea)
-
RE: Japanese anti-Indian strategyposted in 1941 Scenario
i agree take india as fast as possible though taking india will probably make russia and japan have more wars now since gb and china will b out so then eastern front wont be as active as normal which will help the italians do the allie want that i think they do then when the italians ahev all in afrika gb and usa sweep buy and take italy
-
RE: AA50/41 Japanese strategyposted in 1941 Scenario
i realize that now many people have considered asia as a big play ground lets not lose the topic asia is only as important as japan wants it to be if gb makes 1 then japan doesnt care then gb wasted mony+ only good if d-day is well past and atomic bombs are coming….
so asia has to wait for japan ok -
RE: IC in india?posted in 1941 Scenario
i think it is i never did b4 though but if u think of it…
japan then will lose lets argue like 9 ipcs for them plus about 8-18 ipcs they could have gotten depending how much they like asia