Posts made by italiansarecoming

chu ching!

brilliant strategy

A&a is very histroical and true

@Admiral:

Also, the extra comparative income could possibly make the game rather forgiving to an Axis player who makes a few purchasing or tactical mistakes- a privilege that has traditionally been held by the Allies, most notably the USA, who should in my opinion, have an income somewhere in the range of 80-100… but that is entirely beside the point.

In any case, I probably shouldn’t be griping about this game- it probably rocks hard. I can’t wait until October.

Any Axis win is one too many!

BUT 80-100 ok listen hard u.s.a should b weaker income then germany i think that the only reason why its so high for u.s.a. usa gam omg no way lol

but besides that ur to far off usa should keep the same income and in (a&ae usa starts with crap for a reason)
So i think it might need bids dependign on the player also i think for the axis side aa little forgiving is ok expecially for italy

my qoute “Evil always wins thats why the Allies won ww2” somethign Hitler would say

new and testing out qoutes dotn midn the mishap

WOW! finally so transports are defensless@Krieghund:

@JohnBarbarossa:

Does anyone know (Krieghund?) what happens to transports when the following situation occurs:
A BB plus (loaded) trn moves into a seazone to conduct an amphibious assault. In the seazone are present a BB and a trn. The battleships start to go off at each other and both are destroyed.

What happens to the transports? Can they both keep on occupuying the same seazone (until one side sends in combat units) since they are not combat units? Can the amphibious assault still take place?

Both transports would survive, since neither side has any combat units left to destroy them with.  The attacker would then have the choice to either retreat or continue with the amphibious assault.

@JohnBarbarossa:

Another question I have is regarding subs and transports. For example take the German Baltic fleet. There are 1 ss, 1 ca and 1 trn there.

Let’s suppose there are no changes when it is UK’s turn and they attack it with their air (2 ftr, 1 bmb). The UK air combats the cruiser and wins easily. What happens next? Is the transport automatically destroyed even though there still remains combat units? (planes cannot see the subs and vice versa). So in the end only the sub remain?

If this is the case it would mean that the Baltic fleet is of not much use to Germany. Even less than in Revised/Classic.

Since the planes and subs can’t hit each other, the transport is defenseless and is destroyed.

ah tyhere there there its ok cry i understand but you are right amke italy have a few more gains in afirka to make the allies look bad when the axis where palying correctly p: lol LOL!

thanks for the advice about a&a50

ok my explanation is that russia has a small spot were the democratics may take power unhistorical like but look at the game a lot of it doenst deal with historical happenings

like adding men for japan in japanese china and allowing gb to make only 1 ipc complex

lol sorry man i hate hitler but he was a good leader

here is an awesome hopuse rule every 2 turns germany gets a free tank from germany/italy or in the battle field and 1 inf in suez canal on every turn do these look apropriate for a balanced gaem it shows egyptian might and panzers of how hitler wanetd bigger and better tanks (the movement of his tanks clsoe to the end of the war sucked because they used some things not meant to carry that much weight so they had to amek them drive slower)

the only thing for chian i would hate to see is that they can biuld more then 2 tanks and 2 fighters

china shoudl be allowed a maximum for tanks and fighter of 2 each

also no bombers for china really china having bombers unrealistic and thats an eas way of bombing ipcs from japan that would b giving a edge up to the allies
who agrees with these things i posted + expecially the no bombers rule

Yes these are good changes the onlything i would like to see is that russia can have a small democracy spot were the allies may make men for them wouldnt it be cool?

ok but really canadians did make a big impact in my piont of view its for more canadians to get the game truly man they noticed by sales that we buy games to we might be small but we do make them get money so a canadian town will get some new players there me i ahte the idea of vcs and antartica plz lol

ya i agree with you cheaper subs = germany time unless the germany some how has the idea in mind to mass navy then subs and maybe ship from the start would be in the atlantic which is smart german strat

ok……
i am just pionting out that germany if sending all units to russia/ussr then germany can win easily though the allies have to be quite stupid lol i like usa because at the satrt i make gb make the navy and i mass air so far my air is in 2 turns 3 bombers and 5 fighters

1 bomber in gb and 2 fighters 2 fighters in usa and 1 bomber and in gibraltar 1 bomber and 1 fighter

ITALY deserves to be played man dont dis italy ok

italy was rly good dont dis em man i coem and say boo ya the reason italy lsot u.s.a and gb had combined forces against italy which is the strentgh of japan with out all the islands and peaces of chian no dissing italy except for greece they sucked in greece

ok i wouldn’t mind seeing the ww2 map in 1942 if anyone has proper pics and i mean PROPER thats the real deal then lets see it

P.S. i think 1941 setup will give the axis a better chance then the 1942 thats what i think anyways……

lol i need to lean how to qoute + man i was stating that hitler won the war of showing that the germans have some spice. also in a&a any games germany should have more ipcs then u.s.a ok i think that is super cheap i know its out of topic just saying. 
also hitler won the war in theory of taking many lives and such but didnt win the military war thats all and your right i messed up lol :-P

i chose undecided because it is depending what are the objectives of germany and other countries stupid ehough to buy rockets.
really germany needs rockets and maybe russia if russia in military strenght is = more or barely less and germany has trouble else were (not afrca unless germany sent many units there)
so rockets can b if ur objective/strategy uses rockets which is good but also bad