@TheVeteran I’m glad you finally see the light and agree. whew!
Posts made by Imperious Leader
-
RE: Bonus Movement is Unrealistic Nonsenseposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
-
RE: Bonus Movement is Unrealistic Nonsenseposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
@SuperbattleshipYamato everything is now resolved so this never will be brought up again…
-
Vote for Piece colors for upcomng Axis and Allies Afrika Campaignposted in Customizations
Please vote in this poll regarding the colors of pieces for a future Axis and Allies game(s)
or here:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/284219041598621/permalink/6852940068059786/
-
RE: Bonus Movement is Unrealistic Nonsenseposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
“just waiting for someone to come up with a valid explanation for buildings giving magical movement to planes and ships. No one has done this yet.”
Thats the easy part of the problem… centers of logistical support (Rail, Fuel stocks, Quick industrial pathways, established airports that can handle the numbers of planes, centers of trade, population centers of the military industrial complex).
A Batteship cant just park at the Malibu pier and fuel up. If it did , it would have limited range unless Malibu can supply 4 months worth of food, fuel, ammo, etc. It has to go to San Diego or Hawaii, or Puget Sound.
A B17 cant land at Santa Monica Airport and have anything available. It as to go to Paterson, or a military base where an airport with sustainable services exists.
So the real movement of ships is 3, the real movement of planes is +1, the fact that sometimes a Stuka takes off from my driveway, means it has less range than leaving Tempelhof. You and people like you are looking at everything backwards. Planes are being held back in movement and their full capabilities are only seen in terms of range, if they leave an established centre that provides support, parts, fuel, ammo, training, Tikka Masala,etc
Do you not understand now???
-
RE: Interested in TTS?posted in Young Grasshopper
@sneezking Yea right now global is only table top, but 1942 is only like $11 USD, just get it. its the best thing i ever saw in an attempt at a AA game
-
RE: Azimuthal Equidistant G40 mapposted in Customizations
@Lompestein If we can makes these rotate, they could be a gif for a profile picture? Other than that i don’t see much value in the conquest of Antartica
-
RE: Interested in TTS?posted in Young Grasshopper
@sneezking no its a server that has the 5 national flags in a circle. thats the one you want
-
RE: Interested in TTS?posted in Young Grasshopper
@sneezking Let me figure that out, never tried before
-
RE: Interested in TTS?posted in Young Grasshopper
@sneezking 1942 steam is much better, eventually 1040 will get ported, be patient. join discord and everyone plus Kibitzers can chime in live games
-
RE: IPC Cost Reductionposted in House Rules
@SuperbattleshipYamato Don’t sit around, if you have the advantage attack. Lack of attacking causes the stupid stacks and nobody benifits.
-
RE: G1, attack Egypt or not?posted in Axis & Allies 1942 2nd Edition
@SuperbattleshipYamato Everything plus Tank and Man, and bomber. that’s what you got then attack Egypt. no other attacks work on G1. I would do it everytime, no question
-
RE: IPC Cost Reductionposted in House Rules
@SuperbattleshipYamato Your not attacking enough. If you did the only unit stacks would have chips so you can count the odds faster. Play an out of the box game.
-
RE: G1, attack Egypt or not?posted in Axis & Allies 1942 2nd Edition
@ninja_steffen no never unless you transport tank and infantry, and use bomber that survives. the odds are not great. If you dont have that bomber you have no chance.
-
RE: IPC Cost Reductionposted in House Rules
@SuperbattleshipYamato I didn’t know YOU DON’T LIKE CHIPS, but i did know for a fact that people that want cost reductions want more toys on a map and no chips. They help clutter so you can accurately access the problems and win games.
-
RE: IPC Cost Reductionposted in House Rules
@SuperbattleshipYamato I use chips , that’s why they are included.
-
RE: IPC Cost Reductionposted in House Rules
More units ruins the game, IPC cost reduction ruins the game because it will take longer to play and calculate because you introduce alot more units. I have the feeling proponents of these ideas are the same people that don’t like to use chips under units, preferring instead to literally cover the map in junk so nobody can see.
-
RE: What is the Font of the Axis and Allies Logo?posted in Axis & Allies Revised Edition
@djensen I dont know this is a bit of a nacro topic, 2008… dont even know the name of Revised Fonts…
-
RE: Happy Canada Day !!!posted in General Discussion
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_Crisis_of_1944
- Only the first 30 or so miles along the US border is habitable, otherwise uninhabitable ( no difference than the Sahara Desert)
-
RE: Playtesters Wanted for A&A: North Africa by Renegade Gamesposted in News
@matt-hyra Get the Barbarossa 41-45 game finished?
You should hire Kreighund who was Larry Harris’s Second/Adjutant who understands the ins and outs of various rules and how they effect the game design. He also keeps excellent prose in writing rules. PLEASE DONT GO ANY FURTHER UNTIL YOU A LEAST TRY TO GET HIM. Nobody wants another Axis $ Allies: Zombies! Please carry the traditions laid out by LH and Kreighund.