i would like to ask what the british and americans were doing perhaps invading japan?
Posts made by Henz
-
RE: Keeping Anzac under control.posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
-
RE: Who do you go for as Germany?posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
i generally prefer sealion for the extra cash and giving italy a free hand in the med but if a player builds heavy inf the extra couple transports still are useful for russia.
-
RE: G1 movesposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
i dont get the whole buy a carrier as germany. done a few games with 2 successful sealoinos and never purchased a carrier unless u want to attack america with both germany and japan which why wont you just buy a carrier on a future turn.
-
RE: Does anyone play OOB?posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
yeah i feel the same way about alpha. I have tried pacific and like it but am waiting till europe is finalized because my group prefers to play global
-
RE: Is focusing against USA viable?posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
i personally pefer a UK focused attack but if the usa doesnt build a navy in the atlantic it is possible to hit them
-
RE: Has anyone played against themselves lol…?posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
sadly sgtblitz i totally agree but also at least with my group of friends it comes down to finding a time we are all free because of jobs, gfs, etc. Being a pc and console gamer myself i enjoy alot of those games but they dont let u see the look on ur oppenent’s face when the dice betray them
-
RE: AAG40 FAQposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
yeah my main thought was taking extra planes into a combat expecting to lose some but land the remaining ones after
-
RE: UK national objective?posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
in the global game only the euro UK recieves NO money
-
RE: AAG40 FAQposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
correct me if I am wrong but i thought carriers were limited to 2 airplanes
-
RE: Japan/USSR Non-Aggression Pactposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
i would prefer a garrison requirement as was the case in A World at War but honestly any rule would be better then the current nothing
-
RE: Simple idea for game balanceposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
i would say the only problem with this idea is there is no historically the euro axis were defeated on turn X so it makes it hard to judge
-
RE: Krieghund - Landing Russian units on UK?posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
i was 2 when back to the future came out great movie by the way and i am amazed ppl try this russian units in western allies territory stuff. Then again I used to play World at War for years so lived with those restrictions
-
RE: Global 1940 favourite country (poll)posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
always been a fan of the axis powers either japan or germany because u control the action early in the game
-
RE: Caspian Seaposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
has been stated in the faq thread that it is in fact a seazone so yes u can
-
RE: Krieghund - Landing Russian units on UK?posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
i have had this debate also and the simplest solution seems to be until they are at war with the same power they arent allied
-
RE: Question to Krieghundposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
oob a&a has no rules for vichy or free french
-
RE: Newbie helpposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
a good general idea seems to focus on hitting britain or russia as hard as possible with both german and japan
-
RE: Tokyo Expressposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
yeah the only issue would be creating ones for italy and anzac
-
RE: AAG40 FAQposted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
this seems like a common sense, USSR and UK arent allied till they are at war with the same power
-
RE: Three rules questions…posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
1. US and USSR have to be a war with euro axis to enter neutrals
2. USSR has to be at war with the euro axis to get the NO