Topics created by HBG GW Enthusiast

@christophfromgermany Excellent post, Christoph! You should join us on Discord!
https://discord.gg/a7bPbWgk

@hbg-gw-enthusiast Yeah, I looked it up. The FAQ is correct, Free France has a unique rule where it must be its capital.

The only facility that is buildable on your allies territory is the rail line because it’s the only facility that is built on a territory line instead of the territory itself.

Example: I know a rail line exist but for the sake of argument.

Lets say UK wanted to build a rail line between Jordan and Syria. You would build it on the Jordan-Syrian line however because Syria is French, you need France’s permission to do this.

@theveteran
It is one of the golden rules in designing, that rules are intuitively written. Generalization of concepts leads to faster game play and less discussion and looking up rules takes away from gaming time and enjoyment.

@hbg-gw-enthusiast
😀 back to school

The FAQ has been updated:
Q: Can you Lend-lease Militia? Colonial Infantry?

A: Militia: Yes.
A: Colonial Infantry: No

Looks like I was correct about Colonial Infantry, but Caesar-Seriona was right about Militia.

@generalhandgrenade Thanks and I appreciate your efforts on this extremely important issue!

Here’s the Errata General Hand Grenade is discussing:

Page 16, 3.2:
Replace: “Capturing an Objective City from an opposing player scores one Victory Point for each Objective City captured.”
With “Possessing an Objective City scores one Victory Point.”

@trig said in 2.1 Variable End and CCP Possession of Nanking:

The KMT is not a major power. Case closed.

Unless it evolves. Then yes.

Definitive! How did I miss that? Thank you, Trig! 8 )

@spartantom I would apply it, they are nations. It just makes it alot harder for them to get VPs. You basically have to become a major power.

@hbg-gw-enthusiast why does losing the war technically matter if it has nothing to do with the surrender of the nation? it is a minor difference but there are no victory points for technically winning the Chinese Civil War - right? ha.

@hbg-gw-enthusiast Yeah. 1936 is a long game to play, it takes a lot of time to roll for each ship and each colony by the rules. Vichy being light blue just helps with pacing.

@chris_henry said in Using Aircraft More Than Once in a Turn:

I’d think they get one defensive action, and it’s up to the defender which one it is they’d like to do.

Oh i agree, i just think its worded poorly. 9.17 just needs a “as per the interception process in table 9-9”

@theveteran Jinx’s podcast is a great way for people to get to know members of our community better! 8 )

@trig

FAQ has been updated.

Q: Can two nations that share turns attack the same land zone if they are

forbidden to attack together per 6.1 (i.e. USA and minor power KMT)?

A: No.

Of course this doesn’t solve the issue of say, vichy france and Germany attacking the same free french zone, as thats not forbidden in 6.1 (as far as i can tell)

@noneshallpass very good! Agreed.

@insanehoshi yes the state of war between Japan and USSR has no effect or bearing on the alignment rules and conditions that are stated in table 4-3

@mark-the-shark Agreed!

@trig either way - they have a close relationship. AND i have seen on numerous occasions the FAQ/Errata get updated almost immediately after having a conversation with GHG

@hbg-gw-enthusiast
yes it is I - drum1dude hahaha

My video on the set: https://youtu.be/WWraJ1eawRM

The Morrison Games Risk Replacement Pieces: https://www.amazon.com/Risk-Pieces-Replacement-Infantry-Artillery/dp/B00JQIDKNQ/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=Morrison+Games+Risk+Pieces&qid=1625246401&sr=8-1