Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Gorshak
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 10
    • Posts 728
    • Best 19
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 1

    Posts made by Gorshak

    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      Small but decisive victory for the Italians - The med has been cleared of enemy vessels.

      italy-10-finish.tsvg

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      sorry for the long delay - next 2 moves will be much quicker though. Oh, and please ignore the 3 rolls on the dice server - that was by mistake (and also no hit was rolled for anyone in any case).

      American fighter can scramble into the med.

      italy-10-combat.tsvg

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666
      Yes, even though Europe looks very bad for the Axis, the overall game is still exciting. I am curious what you will do.

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666
      now worries - I hope it was the enjoyable life and not the troublesome one

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      japan-10-finish.tsvg

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      germany-10-finish.tsvg

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      scramble options for the carrier.

      germany-10-combat.tsvg

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      I am very sorry for the loong delay - it will not happen again.

      italy-9-finish.tsvg

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • Rule question: Transports, Sub, Naval battle and NCM

      3e00614f-d4ba-4f70-a697-4ad38c2f87fe-grafik.png

      I have a question regarding the rules of non-combat-move (NCM) of the German transports in sz116 - with a russian Sub in the same seazone:

      Is there any legal way in the rules for the fleet to stay in the same field, sink the sub, and NCM transport ground troops from a friendly territory to another friendly territory (for example from Germany to Norway)?

      As i understand the rules, I could load troops, attack the sub and amphibious assault for example Denmark (if Denmark would be Allied occupied).

      From the point of realism it should therefore also be possible to do NCM in the same seazone (if you can do an assault against enemy territory it should also be possible to unload in a friendly port).

      But if i look at the rules in detail it seems i can either load troops in combat-move and do an amphibious assault (same seazone or different one) - or i do not move in combat-move with the transports. But in both ways they cannot move in NCM anymore (assuming that i attack the sub).

      So it somehow looks to me that the only legal way in the rules to be able to do a NCM with the 2 trans is not to attack the sub?

      Is this correct or do I miss something?

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      I have a question regarding the understanding of the rules:
      It is about the German fleet in the Baltic with the Russian Sub.

      Do you know if there is any legal way in the rules for the fleet to stay in the same field, sink the sub, and NCM transport ground troops from a friendly territory to another friendly territory?

      For sure I could load troops, attack the sub and amphibious assault Denmark for example (if Denmark would be Allied occupied) - or move the transports and amphibious assault the Baltic States.

      From the point of realism it should therefore be possible to also do NCM in the same seazone (if you can do an assault against enemey territory it should also be possible to unload in a friendly port).

      For sure it is possible if i do not attack the sub and just ignore it.

      But if i look at the rules in detail it seems i can either load troops in combat-move and do an amphibious assault (same seazone or different one) - or i do not move in combat-move with the trans, but then they cannot move anymore in NCM (assuming that i attack the sub).

      So it somehow looks to me that the only way to be able to do a NCM with the 2 trans is not to attack the sub?

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      brilliant moves in the Pacific!

      I will probably be mostly offline until the weekend - so it might take a few days until i can find a proper repsonse on the battlefield.

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      no scramble

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666
      no stress :)

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      lol

      japan-9-finish.tsvg

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      japan-9-combat.tsvg

      scramble options in the 2 naval battles and in Burma

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      germany-9-finish.tsvg

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: Are Strategic Bombing Raids Worth It?

      @tizkit

      very good explanation of the variables and considerations!
      :)

      posted in Axis & Allies Discussion & Older Games
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      italy-8-finish.tsvg

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      Again 44 IPC worse battle results than the expected results :see_no_evil:

      japan-8-finish.tsvg

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • RE: L22 PtV Gorshak (Axis+12) vs 666 (Allies) #1

      @666

      Yes, in the video AH is urged to finally face reality and capitulate - but he is continuously rejecting to do so. To not give Churchill the satisfaction and also because he believes that he might even still win the war in the end.


      Regarding Germany’s turn in the game - I believe the German Navy and Airforce are just not made for naval battles. Let’s see what the Allied Navy will do.

      germany-8-finish.tsvg

      posted in League
      GorshakG
      Gorshak
    • 1
    • 2
    • 29
    • 30
    • 31
    • 32
    • 33
    • 36
    • 37
    • 31 / 37