@allister I don’t think that anybody here uses this excel. I created it because i was fed up with recounting territories and ipcs. In the “IPC track” tab there is everything you need to count IPCs.
There is also a tab “purchase” where you can calculate your purchases (not yet adapted for pacific).
Best posts made by fasthard
-
RE: [Pacific 1940] teaching 7rd old son (and learning self) -how do I use Excel Macro from fasthard Bm4 to play boardgame pacific onlyposted in Software
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul yes, I’d also prefer to ask, although it might be obvious
-
RE: [Pacific 1940] teaching 7rd old son (and learning self) -how do I use Excel Macro from fasthard Bm4 to play boardgame pacific onlyposted in Software
@allister yes, correct.
The ‘map’ tab is only a picture which helps to build up the board game.
I recommed to save as new table for each new game. (And keep the initail version as it is) Maybe also save new table during the game (every round, 2nd round) to have an insureance if excel crashes anytime ;-). -
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul the big german brother as well 😉
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
TripleA Turn Summary: Italians round 6
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3
Game History
Round: 6 Purchase Units - Italians Italians buy 1 artillery and 9 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Combat Move - Italians 1 armour, 2 infantry and 1 mech_infantry moved from Libya to Tunisia 2 fighters moved from 95 Sea Zone to 92 Sea Zone 1 submarine moved from 95 Sea Zone to 92 Sea Zone 1 armour, 1 artillery and 1 mech_infantry moved from Rostov to Caucasus 1 infantry moved from Bryansk to Tambov 1 armour moved from Bryansk to Caucasus 1 bomber moved from Southern Italy to Tambov 1 artillery moved from Bryansk to Tambov 1 submarine moved from 98 Sea Zone to 95 Sea Zone Combat - Italians Battle in 92 Sea Zone Italians attack with 2 fighters and 1 submarine British defend with 1 destroyer Italians roll dice for 1 submarine in 92 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits British roll dice for 1 destroyer in 92 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits 1 submarine owned by the Italians lost in 92 Sea Zone 1 destroyer owned by the British lost in 92 Sea Zone Italians win with 2 fighters remaining. Battle score for attacker is 2 Casualties for Italians: 1 submarine Casualties for British: 1 destroyer Battle in Tambov Italians attack with 1 artillery, 1 bomber and 1 infantry Russians defend with 1 infantry Italians roll dice for 1 artillery, 1 bomber and 1 infantry in Tambov, round 2 : 1/3 hits, 1,33 expected hits Russians roll dice for 1 infantry in Tambov, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0,33 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Russians lost in Tambov Italians win, taking Tambov from Russians with 1 artillery, 1 bomber and 1 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 3 Casualties for Russians: 1 infantry Battle in Tunisia Italians attack with 1 armour, 2 infantry and 1 mech_infantry British defend with 1 armour Italians roll dice for 1 armour, 2 infantry and 1 mech_infantry in Tunisia, round 2 : 0/4 hits, 1,00 expected hits British roll dice for 1 armour in Tunisia, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0,50 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Italians lost in Tunisia Italians roll dice for 1 armour, 1 infantry and 1 mech_infantry in Tunisia, round 3 : 1/3 hits, 0,83 expected hits British roll dice for 1 armour in Tunisia, round 3 : 1/1 hits, 0,50 expected hits 1 infantry owned by the Italians lost in Tunisia 1 armour owned by the British lost in Tunisia Italians win, taking Tunisia from British with 1 armour and 1 mech_infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 0 Casualties for Italians: 2 infantry Casualties for British: 1 armour Battle in Caucasus Italians attack with 2 armour, 1 artillery and 1 mech_infantry British defend with 1 artillery and 1 infantry Italians roll dice for 2 armour, 1 artillery and 1 mech_infantry in Caucasus, round 2 : 4/4 hits, 1,67 expected hits Russians roll dice for 1 artillery and 1 infantry in Caucasus, round 2 : 0/2 hits, 0,67 expected hits 1 artillery owned by the British and 1 infantry owned by the British lost in Caucasus Italians win, taking Caucasus from Russians with 2 armour, 1 artillery and 1 mech_infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 7 Casualties for British: 1 artillery and 1 infantry Non Combat Move - Italians 1 artillery moved from Cyprus to 99 Sea Zone 1 marine moved from Crete to 99 Sea Zone 1 artillery, 1 battleship, 2 cruisers, 1 destroyer, 1 marine and 1 transport moved from 99 Sea Zone to 95 Sea Zone 1 marine moved from 95 Sea Zone to Northern Italy 1 artillery moved from 95 Sea Zone to Northern Italy 2 fighters moved from 92 Sea Zone to 95 Sea Zone 1 aaGun moved from France to Northern Italy 2 infantry moved from France to Northern Italy 2 infantry moved from Normandy Bordeaux to France 2 fighters moved from Western Germany to Southern Italy 1 bomber moved from Tambov to Ukraine Place Units - Italians 1 artillery and 9 infantry placed in Northern Italy Turning on Edit Mode EDIT: Removing units owned by Italians from Southern Italy: 2 aaGuns EDIT: Adding units owned by Italians to Northern Italy: 2 aaGuns EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode Turn Complete - Italians Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 0 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 105 Sea Zone. Rolls: 4,5,4,4 Italians collect 20 PUs; end with 20 PUs Objective Italians 5 Control Convoy Lanes: Italians met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 23 PUsCombat Hit Differential Summary :
Italians regular : 1,83 Russians regular : -1,00 British regular : 1,67 -
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
I dont know if i ever saw 10 units build in Northern Italy
Italy prepares for the to welcome of the US ;-)
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
French units in sz 110 are on the 7th USA transport
you mean thefrench inf plan to go there?
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul or does “rolled” already include +2
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul I found the MARTI Mail. It’s already +2
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul Thx, I never used this kind of italian can opener…
But I recognized (especially now though I play via forum), it’s more fun to play fast instead of getting bored to a game which lasts forever.
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
I didnt want to gamble with the Sea Lion
Yep, I got it on the second view…
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
What are ur comments about allied neutral attack?
First I was surprised, but than again it seems logic due to dunkirk…
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
tomorrow
here is also holiday, so take your time. I’ll be with the kids all the day, maybe I can play in the evening.
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
i had a bomber in borneo i forgot that i have him
no problem, I would have asked you if u missed that.
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
fast and hard
as ur nickname says ;)
yes, I try to keep the pace. I allowed to edit the two italian marines to south italy via edit, they missed their bus which was already gone to the battle against the sub. I hope it’s ok, if not feel free to edit them to north italy.
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
2 german ftr are on the german carrier and 2 on one italian carrier
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul no problem, take your time. goodnight!
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
Can u please post Russian ncm and placement
Sorry overlooked your post…
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul said in BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15):
1 destroyer owned by the Japanese lost in 35 Sea Zone
Hi, I think I’d lost a Ftr there, due to your annoying subs. Is it possible to change it without big thinking/editing?
-
RE: BM4 Fasthard (Axis) vs Amon-Sul (Allies +15)posted in League
@Amon-Sul edited phillipines dd/fig,
SZ96: 2german ftr on one italian carrier, 1 italian ftr on the other italian carrier