@Amon-Sul please play 2nd map with
EDIT: Removing units owned by Russians from Novgorod: 1 infantry
EDIT: Adding units owned by Russians to Eastern Poland: 1 infantry
Best posts made by fasthard
-
RE: L24 BM4 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Fasthard (Allies+24) - Game 5posted in League
-
RE: L24 BM4 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Fasthard (Allies+24) - Game 5posted in League
@Amon-Sul yep, that’s true. One day I was afraid that A&A might be boring anytime… Not with you :-D
-
RE: L24 BM4 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Fasthard (Allies+24) - Game 5posted in League
@Amon-Sul yes, sry overread your post about the carriers
-
RE: L24 BM4 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Fasthard (Allies+24) - Game 5posted in League
@Amon-Sul absolute no problem, take your time. I think allies prepared something, especially for Germany
-
RE: L24 BM4 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Fasthard (Allies+24) - Game 5posted in League
@Amon-Sul sure

There are also 3 mechs in S. Africa -
RE: L24 BM4 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Fasthard (Allies+24) - Game 5posted in League
@Amon-Sul yes, axis got good hits but the allies managed to conquer Norway and sunk the German fleet, that was the main goal. Hoped that the US do the job, but now they might focus totally on Japan for the next round/s ;-)
-
RE: L24 BM4 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Fasthard (Allies+24) - Game 5posted in League
@Amon-Sul Hi, I’m on holidays for one week. But I’ve got a Laptop with me. Try to play italy when there’s time, no need to hurry 😀
-
RE: pacifiersboard (X) -vs- fasthard (L +22) BM #2posted in League
@pacifiersboard feel free to land the surviving german aircraft to Crete or Cyprus
-
RE: L24 BM4 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Fasthard (Allies+24) - Game 5posted in League
@Amon-Sul thx for your feedback.
If Germany had less unluck on G3 I’m sure the game would have been ended in the other way. Never had in mind that the axis would attack the neutrals.
It there were more units in Spain and Turkey Germany could defend it easier and the UK would not have the capacity to send lots of their troups to India, which would of course help Japan…
Therefore in general it’s possible for the axis to attack the neutrals and keep their fronts at the atlantic and also against the soviets.
I was also wondering about the G1 purchase and was afraid about London.I’ll start a new job next week therefore I’m fine with a break.
-
RE: L24 BM4 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Fasthard (Allies+24) - Game 5posted in League
@Amon-Sul let’s create a new one after the break. You’ll play the Allies +24?
-
RE: L24 BM4 Amon-Sul (Axis) vs Fasthard (Allies+24) - Game 5posted in League
@Amon-Sul of course!
AA guns on the Pacific side - does make sense. btw japan does not like it ;-) -
RE: pacifiersboard (X) -vs- fasthard (L +22) BM #2posted in League
@pacifiersboard Max defence (might not be enough here…) ;-)
-
RE: pacifiersboard (X) -vs- fasthard (L +22) BM #2posted in League
@pacifiersboard ja, das passt schon. Denke, dass ich entweder zuviel Russen nach China gesendet habe und/oder zu wenig RAF in Moskaus Reichweite hatte um es zu sein verteidigen.
Zudem sind mmn Amerika und Anazc im Pazifik auch nicht in den Quark gekommen… -
L25 BM4 fasthard(X) vs Amon-Sul(L+24)posted in League
Bid +24
1 AA gun Sakha
1 AA gun Buryatia
1 art Amur
1 AA gun Burma
1 AA gun India -
RE: L25 BM4 fasthard(X) vs Amon-Sul(L+24)posted in League
@Amon-Sul yep, back in business.
AA guns everywhere… Might not be the worst against the 20+ Japanese fighter…
Let’s see if I learnt something in the past games. The bid looks like fun for the EU axis, the PAC axis maybe not… -
RE: L25 BM4 fasthard(X) vs Amon-Sul(L+24)posted in League
@Amon-Sul are there any plans for the french? ;-)
-
RE: L25 BM4 fasthard(X) vs Amon-Sul(L+24)posted in League
@Amon-Sul please play 2nd map with
EDIT: Removing units owned by Japanese from 35 Sea Zone: 1 destroyer
EDIT: Adding units owned by Japanese to 34 Sea Zone: 1 destroyer -
RE: L25 BM4 fasthard(X) vs Amon-Sul(L+24)posted in League
@Amon-Sul can you please fix it during the ANZAC move? Thx
-
RE: L25 BM4 fasthard(X) vs Amon-Sul(L+24)posted in League
@Amon-Sul yes, so I can ignore the French Dd