Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. farmboy
    3. Best
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 3
    • Topics 53
    • Posts 14,566
    • Best 469
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 8

    Best posts made by farmboy

    • RE: oysteilo (X) vs. farmboy (A+9) BM3

      @oysteilo said in oysteilo (X) vs. farmboy (A+9) BM3:

      i dont think i can keep egypt though so so

      Long term, I hope not. Short term you might with the German air supporting. I didn’t calculate it. I had some pretty good dice in those UK combats to improve my chances

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: oysteilo (X) vs. farmboy (A+9) BM3

      @oysteilo said in oysteilo (X) vs. farmboy (A+9) BM3:

      lets see if you are going to kill my germans, coming up in a few minutes

      We will see. I don’t like risking the game on 85% odds, so you might have called my bluff. Will have to think about this.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: oysteilo (X) vs. farmboy (A+9) BM3

      you called my bluff, and now i have to regret all those lost blockers and inefficient spending

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: oysteilo (X) vs. farmboy (A+9) BM3

      Not looking at the map right now but I won’t scramble in India. I’m assuming that is the only one.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: oysteilo (X) vs. farmboy (A+9) BM3

      Thanks for the game! No time right now for a rematch but will be up for one down the road.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: oysteilo (X) vs. farmboy (A+9) BM3

      I’m not too sure as we’ve played this game over a few weeks and earlier turns get fuzzy. But 1) I think the heavy German navy build probably doesn’t work as well with a J2. Because of the J2, I knew I had more time in the pacific so could spend heavy in the early turns to match the German navy build. And once I got in the med I could largely ignore it. Had you focused on land, your edge against the Soviets would be more substantial. I would have built more efficiently and defensively as well but not sure if I could have compensated. Or had you gone J1, with that navy, I would have had a harder time setting up in the Atlantic. You might have also tried to set up in a way to get Gibraltar. This is where Marines or an extra transport can come in handy. I wasted a lot of transports just to hold Gib and it ended up being worth it. But a 2-4 more land units and I would have likely had to reconsider. I would also have to be nervous about UK had you had more land units available.

      And you often kept your air on the carriers rather than the W Germany Airbase rather than the airbase. This meant it was almost always out of range from my Allied fleet in the med. This gave me more options and meant I could split the fleet or leave it with fewer air and not have to worry about you taking it out.

      Again, everything is a bit fuzzy now but I recall thinking those things as we were playing.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: BM3 (Bombers cost 14) Adam514 (Axis) vs farmboy (Allies+10)

      @Adam514 said in BM3 (Bombers cost 14) Adam514 (Axis) vs farmboy (Allies+10):

      @farmboy I concede, good game and well played! This game was PTSD inducing haha.

      There were a few moments that I felt you had moves that could close out the match much sooner, but I’ve long forgotten them by now. I’m pretty sure this was my longest match ever.

      I’d be up for a rematch.

      Thanks for the game! I’m glad I managed to pull that off, but dice definitely made a decisive difference as well. I don’t think I’ve ever had such consistently good dice (essentially over 37 rounds!) and I certainly have never had such good dice and still not be sure of the outcome.

      And so far I think I do better in this game at denying my opponent’s victory than at setting up to win. Everything is now foggy for me as well, but if you do think of things that I could have done differently, I’d be interested.

      One thing I recall thinking was that for a period of the mid/late game I was playing the pacific too conservatively. I was fairly convinced I was going to win in Europe and just thought I should avoid giving you any close to 50/50 attacks on my pacific fleet. I think I had some opportunities to take and hold Java. And I could have set up at Marianas earlier which I think was helpful to me when I did it. But I was too afraid that you would be nervous about Europe and you would gamble. In hindsight, I think I should have risked it.

      We’ve actually had one longer game. The playoff game last year went to around 60 rounds although the sides were reversed, and I think you had effectively won it by the early 40s.

      I’ll certainly be up for a rematch down the road but it will need to wait a bit. My wife is due to give birth in about a month so I need to avoid starting new games here until things settle down. These games tend to be all consuming and I don’t think i have the discipline or time management skills to do both. I also doubt my dice luck will continue although hopefully I can avoid some of the mistakes I did make.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3

      no scramble. although it was very tempting

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3

      @ksmckay said in L20 #5 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+19) BM3:

      you cant put two marines on one transport.

      I’m pretty sure you can actually. Apart from their special amphibious abilities they are equivalent to inf.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3

      @Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3:

      interesting G1

      awaiting Russia

      cheers

      Yeah. I don’t often see the 109 attack. And you had pretty solid dice except in France where I did a little better than average.

      GL and HF!

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3

      @Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3:

      I like Ur buy. Cheers

      If I don’t see a land build for Germany, than I prefer to build artillery for the Soviets.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3

      reposted with a couple of ncm changes

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3

      @Amon-Sul said in L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3:

      I saw this sz 92 uk1 move first time recently in a game against adam, and i must say, its an interesting one

      I think it is often better than Taranto although I’m not sure if this was the right time to use it (given the German transport build and your attack on 109). The logic of Taranto is that you trade the UK threat for the Italian one, but this one allows the UK to threaten both Germany and Italy (and help defend both Egypt and London) while containing the Italians.

      And yes, the UK dice were great this round. If you had scored two hits in 110, that would have caused some difficulty.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3

      Dice worked out for me there too. Scotland was a gamble on your part, but a good AA result would have really paid off.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3

      @farmboy conserve the destroyer before other Naval.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3

      I didn’t expect you to go for that fleet given the odds, but despite that and the good dice I had, I think that move actually paid off for you. Your loss was only -6 and the German attack will potentially make that up. It may be the case that I should have committed to losing fighters instead of fleet, but I was thinking that the German follow up made that too much of a risk.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3

      @Amon-Sul because of the destroyer, my sub had a free first strike which made this worth it. I’m pretty sure if I had missed and your sub had hit, I could have taken the destroyer as a casualty before your air rolled (although not a 100% sure on that)

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3

      @Amon-Sul for sure

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3

      @farmboy If it is a walkin combat I’d usually be fine with it being done as an edit.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • RE: L20 #1 Amon-Sul (X) vs farmboy (A+12) BM3

      @Amon-Sul the 92 stack UK1 is a good setup to deny pressure on London and still pressure Italy in the med.

      posted in League
      farmboyF
      farmboy
    • 1
    • 2
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 9
    • 10
    • 23
    • 24
    • 8 / 24