Suggested Topics

C

Advice to Renegade! What is on your top 10 for adjustments to G40 3rd edition?

House Rules
• • • crockett36

58

2
Votes

58
Posts

6.4k
Views

F

@crockett36 Make France more powerful :)
K

Karl7 vs CANADA FOOLS

Team Games
• • • Karl7

238

0
Votes

238
Posts

9.0k
Views

C

TripleA Turn Summary: Japanese round 8
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3

Game History
Round: 8 Purchase Units - Japanese Japanese buy 10 infantry; Remaining resources: 4 PUs; 6 SuicideAttackTokens; Combat Move - Japanese 1 submarine moved from 22 Sea Zone to 48 Sea Zone Combat - Japanese Non Combat Move - Japanese Place Units - Japanese 10 infantry placed in Japan Turn Complete - Japanese Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 17 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 41 Sea Zone. Rolls: 3,1 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 43 Sea Zone. Rolls: 5,1 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 37 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,4 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 39 Sea Zone. Rolls: 4,1 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 20 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,6,6,6,6,4,6,6,1,4,6,1,3,4,2,1,6 Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 6 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,2,3,1 Japanese collect 17 PUs (17 lost to blockades); end with 21 PUs Objective Japanese 3 Control Honolulu Or Sydney Or Calcutta Or Western United States: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 26 PUs
Combat Hit Differential Summary :

Savegame
E

mike v entek (axis) G40

Play Boardgames
• • • Entek

36

0
Votes

36
Posts

308
Views

M

CV-cruiser-CV-fighter-battleship
S

1941 out-of-box rules, SuperbattleshipYamato (Allies) vs FranceNeedsMorePower (Axis)

Play Boardgames
• • • SuperbattleshipYamato

24

0
Votes

24
Posts

35
Views

F

@SuperbattleshipYamato Did you quit or something you have not taken your turn.
C

World at War Captain Walker (axis) vs Entek

Play Boardgames
• • • captainwalker

259

0
Votes

259
Posts

17.1k
Views

E

TripleA Turn Summary: Chinese round 16
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World At War

Game History
Round: 16 Combat Move - Chinese 4 Infantrys moved from W.Qinghai to Sikang 6 Infantrys moved from Hsining to E.Qinghai 4 Infantrys moved from E.Sinkiang to Gobi Altai 4 Infantrys moved from Urumqi to E.Sinkiang Purchase Units - Chinese Chinese buy 1 Bunker and 5 Infantrys; Remaining resources: 1 PUs; Combat - Chinese Battle in Sikang Chinese attack with 4 Infantrys Yamamoto defend with 1 Infantry Chinese roll dice for 4 Infantrys in Sikang, round 2 : 3/4 hits, 0.67 expected hits Yamamoto roll dice for 1 Infantry in Sikang, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits 1 Infantry owned by the Yamamoto lost in Sikang Chinese win, taking Sikang from Yamamoto with 4 Infantrys remaining. Battle score for attacker is 2 Casualties for Yamamoto: 1 Infantry Non Combat Move - Chinese Place Units - Chinese 1 Bunker placed in E.Qinghai 5 Infantrys placed in Hsining Turn Complete - Chinese Chinese collect 15 PUs; end with 16 PUs
Combat Hit Differential Summary :
Yamamoto regular : -0.33 Chinese regular : 2.33
Savegame
V

World at War Game 21

Team Games
• • • VictoryFirst

239

0
Votes

239
Posts

12.6k
Views

E

TripleA Turn Summary: Dutch round 9
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World At War

Game History
Round: 9 Purchase Units - Dutch Dutch buy 2 Bunkers and 1 Infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; Non Combat Move - Dutch 1 Elite and 1 Infantry moved from Suriname to 32 Sea Zone 1 Elite, 1 Infantry and 1 Transport moved from 32 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone 1 Elite and 1 Infantry moved from 36 Sea Zone to French Sudan Place Units - Dutch 1 Infantry placed in Suriname 1 Bunker placed in Soembawa 1 Bunker placed in Flores Turn Complete - Dutch Dutch collect 12 PUs; end with 12 PUs
Combat Hit Differential Summary :

Savegame
S

History of the forum

Website/Forum Discussion
• • • SuperbattleshipYamato

4

0
Votes

4
Posts

106
Views

S

@Imperious-Leader

Hi! Do you have any fun stories or moments from the forum before I joined that you’d like to share? Thank you!
T

Units, Mechanics, etc.

Axis & Allies Europe 1940
• • • The Janus

80

2
Votes

80
Posts

7.7k
Views

T

@SuperbattleshipYamato said in Units, Mechanics, etc.:

I think what you wrote can be distilled down to 3 complaints:

There’s not much of a historical reason for this.
There’s not much of a game design reason for them.

I think this is where you’re fundamentally misreading me.
I care almost not at all about adding mechanics for historical reasons; if adding historical realism reduces balance, get rid of it.

I think that N.O.'s are a mechanic that imbalances the game – historical or not, is irrelevant. It’s the Occam’s razor approach, that I take. If something isn’t making the game better, find a way to get rid of it. Simplify.

Escaper

@Escaper

Best posts made by Escaper

Latest posts made by Escaper