Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. EnoughSaid
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 1
    • Posts 67
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by EnoughSaid

    • RE: Global 1940 (metal map)

      You, sir, are an inspiration.

      Given time, I think I’ll “sincerely flatter” your works.

      posted in Customizations
      EnoughSaidE
      EnoughSaid
    • RE: The US as an aggresive Axis power, Japan as a peaceful Allied power.

      @ Narvik
      Nope, not Cold War. The idea is history went a different path after the Spanish-American War, leading to America joining the Axis and Japan joining the Allies. It’s still 1940 WWII, just an alternate timeline.

      @knp
      I’m glad you like the story additions! It all just seemed to come together. Building from the bottom-up, I had 3 goals at the start: The need to make invading London not the obvious go-to win, the need to cut US income down while still making it feel like America, and an objective to turn South America into a conflict zone. With the Philippines and West Indies on the chopping block, it went from there and the pieces just fell together.

      The biggest reason, I think, that your game’s Sealion was too easy, is pretty simple: you gave the USA 387 IPCs worth of naval units. For comparison, OOB Japan is 234. At my present iteration, USA has 268.
      I decided right away to take out all the transports in the Atlantic. Spain popping up with 11 troops or so demands attention from Germany. Thanks to Halifax, UK’s income is centralized, so more can be spent in the Atlantic. Furthermore, Russia can break the NAP on Turn 3 now instead of Turn 4. All serve to counterbalance Sealion.

      I’m OK with Canada getting overrun. It should lose. It doesn’t make sense not to, and the border mapping isn’t conducive to a drawn out fight. But, while Canada goes down, it can still put up a fight! While the US is focused on Canada, it won’t be focused on Latin America or it might spread itself too thin, giving time for UK/Commonwealth to build up an army down there. To make up for the lost income, the Commonwealth can still nab some territories in Indonesia and/or South America.

      I did just make a couple more changes, too.
      V1.2 –-> V1.3
      -Moved US submarine from SZ 101 to SZ 102 (I didn’t intend for US to be able to scramble fighters to defend the sub.)
      -Closed a loophole that would let China throw itself in the war early, should US choose to invade Hong Kong on T2. (gameplay change rule #3)
      -Added 1 AAA to Ontario and Quebec, and 1 Infantry to Queensland.

      posted in House Rules
      EnoughSaidE
      EnoughSaid
    • RE: The US as an aggresive Axis power, Japan as a peaceful Allied power.

      I managed to do a couple rounds of self-playtesting. Based on that I made some small changes to almost all the sections, and fixed some errors. (Hello v1.2!)  :-D

      I was very happy how it turned out so far. But I’m not you guys! I’m sure someone can point out a gap I missed, or a better idea. (It’s cool to just say I’m awesome, too. I dig flattery.)
      Seriously, any feedback is good feedback. And I’d be thrilled to hear how a game went. One thing about this that excites me so much is that it seems to be very re-playable and can go off in several different directions!

      May the dice be ever in your favor.
      (couldn’t resist)

      posted in House Rules
      EnoughSaidE
      EnoughSaid
    • RE: The US as an aggresive Axis power, Japan as a peaceful Allied power.

      –—HOW THE WAR IS WON-----

      The Axis wins the game by controlling either 8 victory cities on the Europe map (excluding Ottowa) or any any 6 victory cities on the Pacific map at the end of a round of turns, as long as they control an Axis capital (Berlin, Rome, or Washington).

      The Allies win by controlling Berlin, plus either Washington or San Francisco, at the end of a round, as long as they control an Allied capital (London, Paris, Moscow, or Tokyo).


      I’m anxious to hear everyone’s thoughts! Especially yours, knp7765.

      posted in House Rules
      EnoughSaidE
      EnoughSaid
    • RE: The US as an aggresive Axis power, Japan as a peaceful Allied power.

      v1.4

      ––GAMEPLAY CHANGES-----

      1. China is now an industrialized nation. It can only build units at factories. It does not require the Burma Road to build artillery. China cannot build Battleships or Aircraft Carriers.
      2. China starts with 0 IPCs.
      3. China may not move men into Kwangtung (Hong Kong) unless China is at war with the United States.
      4. Japan and China cannot move men into a territory controlled by the Soviet Union until they are at war with Germany.
      5. The United States may not move vessels into Sea Zones 5, 6, 17, 19, and 20 without declaring war on Japan.
      6. Other nations are not restricted in their movement.
      7. Japan cannot declare war until Turn 3. China can only declare war if Japan is at war against that power. Any nation that declares war on China will also declare war on Japan.
      8. The Soviet Union may break it’s Non-Aggression Pact with Germany to declare war on Germany on Turn 3.
      9. The Soviet-Mongolian Defense Pact is changed to read: “If any Axis power attacks any Soviet-controlled territory that is adjacent to any Mongolian territory…”
      10. Dutch territories are treated as defenseless territories open to capture by any player, and doing so does not trigger any state of war.
      TURN ORDER and Starting IPCs
      Germany - 30 IPCs
      United Kingdom - 39 IPCs
      United States - 46 IPCs
      Japan - 15 IPCs
      Russia - 38 IPCs
      Italy - 10 IPCs
      France - 19 IPCs
      The Commonwealth - 17 IPCs
      China - 0 IPCs
      (China will earn 25 IPCs from territories if no territories are gained or lost in the first turn.)

      –—SETUP CHANGES---- (+/- compared to OOB)

      Germany
      Germany: +1 Tank
      Western Germany: +1 Infantry
      Sea Zone 117: -1 Submarine

      Italy
      Northern Italy: -1 AAA
      Southern Italy:  +2 Mechanized Infantry, -3 Infantry
      Sicily: +1 Infantry
      Tobruk: +1 Artillery
      Sea Zone 95: +1 Destroyer

      United States
      Alaska: 2 Infantry, 1 Fighter
      Western United States: 4 Infantry, 3 Mechanized Infantry, 2 Artillery, 1 Tank, 1 AAA, 1 Fighter, 1 Tactical Bomber, Air Base, Naval Base, Industrial Complex
      Central United States: 5 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 3 Tanks, 1 AAA, 1 Strategical Bomber, Industrial Complex
      Eastern United States: 6 Infantry, 2 Artillery, 1 Tank, 1 AAA, 2 Fighters, 1 Tactical Bomber, Air Base, Naval Base, Industrial Complex
      Greenland: 1 Infantry
      Central America: 2 Infantry
      Hawaiian Islands: 3 Infantry, 2 Artillery, 2 Tanks, 2 AAA, 1 Strategical Bomber, Air Base, Naval Base
      Guam: 1 Infantry, 1 Fighter, Air Base
      Midway: 1 Infantry, Air Base
      Wake Island: 1 Infantry, 1 Tactical Bomber, Air Base
      Sea Zone 1: 1 Submarine
      Sea Zone 10: 2 Transports, 1 Destroyer, 1 Cruiser, 1 Aircraft Carrier (w/ 1 Fighter, 1 Tactical Bomber), 1 Battleship
      Sea Zone 25: 1 Aircraft Carrier (w/ 2 Fighters)
      Sea Zone 26: 2 Transports, 2 Cruisers, 1 Aircraft Carrier (w/ 1 Fighter, 1 Tactical Bomber), 1 Battleship
      Sea Zone 29: 1 Submarine
      Sea Zone 30: 1 Destroyer
      Sea Zone 31: 1 Destroyer
      Sea Zone 102: 1 Submarine
      Sea Zone 121: 1 Submarine, 1 Cruiser

      France
      Gibraltar: +2 Infantry
      Morocco: -1 Infantry
      Sea Zone 72: -1 Destroyer
      Sea Zone 94: +1 Destroyer

      United Kingdom
      New Foundland / Labrador: +1 Infantry, +1 Tank, +Naval Base
      West Indies: +3 Infantry, +1 Artillery, +2 AAA, +Naval Base
      British Guiana: +2 Infantry
      India: -3 Infantry, -2 AAA, Major Factory
      Burma: +1 Artillery, -1 Infantry, -1 Fighter
      Malaya: -1 Infantry
      Borneo: +2 Infantry
      New South Wales: +1 Infantry
      Sea Zone 37: +1 Cruiser, -1 Battleship
      Sea Zone 39: +1 Battleship, -1 Transport, -1 Destroyer, -1 Cruiser
      Sea Zone 89: +1 Transport, +2 Destroyers
      Sea Zone 106: +1 Submarine, -1 Transport, -1 Destroyer
      Sea Zone 116: +1 Transport, +1 Destroyer
      No units in Canadian territories.

      The Commonwealth (Canada)
      Western Canada: 2 Infantry, 1 Artillery, Commonwealth control marker
      Alberta / Saskatchewan / Manitoba: 1 Infantry
      Ontario: 2 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Tank, 2 AAA, 1 Fighter
      Quebec: 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Mechanized Infantry, 1 Tank, 1 AAA, 1 Fighter, Major Factory
      New Brunswick / Nova Scotia: 1 Infantry, 1 Artillery, -Naval Base
      Sea Zone 106: 1 Transport

      (ANZAC)
      New South Wales: 2 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 2 AAA, Naval Base, Major Factory
      Queensland: 3 Infantry, 1 Fighter, Air Base, Naval Base
      Western Australia: 1 Infantry
      New Zealand: 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 2 Fighters, Air Base, Naval Base
      New Britain: 1 Infantry
      Solomon Islands: 1 Infantry
      Sea Zone 50: 1 Destroyer
      Sea Zone 62: 1 Transport, 1 Destroyer
      Sea Zone 63: 1 Transport, 1 Cruiser

      Soviet Union (Pacific)
      Soviet Far East: 3 Infantry, 1 AAA
      Siberia: 2 Infantry
      Amur: 2 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Tank, Naval Base, Major Factory (Amur has an IPC value of 2)
      Buryatia: 1 Infantry
      Yakut SSR: 1 Infantry, 1 Artillery
      Yenisey: 2 Mechanized Infantry
      Sea Zone 5: 1 Transport, 1 Submarine, 1 Cruiser

      China
      Kansu: 1 Infantry
      Sikang: 1 Infantry
      Shensi: 1 Infantry
      Szechwan: 2 Infantry, 1 Minor Factory (Szechwan has an IPC value of 2)
      Hopei: 1 Infantry
      Anhwe: 1 Infantry
      Manchuria: 2 Infantry, 1 Artillery
      Jehol: 1 Infantry
      Shantung: 2 Infantry
      Kiangsu: 1 Infantry, 2 Mechanized Infantry 1 Artillery, Naval Base
      Kiangsi: 1 Infantry
      Hunan: 1 Infantry
      Kwangsi: 1 Infantry
      Yunnan: 1 Infantry
      Formosa: Chinese control marker
      Hainan: Chinese control marker
      Sea Zone 19: 1 Destroyer
      Sea Zone 36: 1 Submarine

      Japan
      Japan: 6 Infantry, 2 Artillery, 1 Tank, 3 AAA, 2 Fighters, 1 Tactical Bomber, Air Base, Naval Base, Industrial Complex
      Korea: 2 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Tank, 1 Fighter
      Okinawa: 2 Infantry
      Iwo Jima: 2 Infantry
      Philippines: 4 Infantry, 2 Artillery, 1 Fighter, Air Base, Naval Base, Japanese control marker
      Marshall Islands: 1 Infantry
      Caroline Islands: 2 Infantry, Naval Base
      Marianas: 1 Infantry
      Palau Island: 1 Infantry
      Sea Zone 6: 1 Transport, 1 Destroyer, 1 Cruiser, 1 Aircraft Carrier (w/ 1 Fighter, 1 Tactical Bomber), 2 Battleships
      Sea Zone 17: 1 Submarine
      Sea Zone 19: 1 Transport, 1 Destroyer
      Sea Zone 33: 1 Cruiser, 1 Aircraft Carrier (w/ 1 Fighter)
      Sea Zone 35: 1 Transport, 1 Submarine, 1 Destroyer

      Notes:

      • I am using the 1940G 2nd Edition.
      • This is played with Halifax Rules, with South Africa as part of the United Kingdom.
      • You will probably need more grey unit tokens to play this. There are a lot more units on the board.
      • I recommend the usage of French troops for China’s non-infantry units.
      • Ontario (Ottowa) DOES border Central United States and Eastern United States.
      • New Brunswick / Nova Scotia does NOT border Quebec.
      posted in House Rules
      EnoughSaidE
      EnoughSaid
    • RE: The US as an aggresive Axis power, Japan as a peaceful Allied power.

      v1.4

      –—THE STORY-----

      [cue dramatic music and gruff Narrator:]
        This story has its beginnings in the Spanish-American War. The Manifest Destiny fervor that swept the United States decades prior has not subsided. The US, after a crushing defeat of Spain, receives both Cuba and the Philippines in the Treaty of Paris. The Latin American nations, traditionally on good terms with the US due to the Monroe Doctrine’s protectionism from European influence, realize that the United States is not too different from their old colonial rulers after all.
        Britain, concerned that it is no longer the most influential power in the Caribbean, supports the continued Cuban resistance. After a nationwide revolt planned by Jose Marti succeeds nearly overnight in establishing control, Cuba publicly sues for protection from Great Britain, as planned. It is now the English that are seen as champions of freedom in the New World.
        Meanwhile, a similar scenario finds itself occurring in the Philippines. Japan, as the most advanced nation in Asia and led by their holy Emperor, views opposing the expansion of Western powers in Asia as its sacred duty. The Japanese provide arms and training to the Filipinos, and after 4 years of war they succeed in winning independence.
        Shortly after, in the Russo-Japanese War, the Japanese gain global recognition by defeating the Russians to protect Korea and capture part of Manchuria. The Japanese Navy is famed throughout the world after annihilating two of Russia’s three fleets, and Japanese naval designs are considered to be of top design and prestige.

      Moving forward –
      (edits made to knp7765’s story)

      …Franklin Roosevelt lost the 1933 election to a more isolationist candidate. This new guy uses similar national building project to put people to work and jump start the economy, but he also decides to build up the military in order to protect his isolationist ideals. The thinking is that if the US is militarily strong, no outside forces would dare try to impose their ideas on America. This is due in part to strong military leaders lobbying the president for larger military budgets.
        Later, when war breaks out in Europe, even though aghast at the horrible carnage there is some level of envy at how quickly the Third Reich has managed to increase their holdings. After all, the United States is great, but they could always be better, right? This, coupled with a bit of sympathy for Germany over the harsh terms of the Versailles Treaty, actually causes the openings of negotiations between the US and Germany. Of course, Germany is keen to obtain such a powerful and rich ally. They say, “Why should such a powerful nation as the US have to import and pay for things like rubber, tin and oil from the East Indies when they could go out and simply OWN them?” Of course, these actions would invariably draw attention and resources from the British Empire and perhaps make it that much harder for England itself to keep holding out. In spite of the awesome attacks by the Third Reich upon England and the ongoing U-Boat campaign against British shipping, Churchill is adamant to keeping the British Empire intact.
        Then once England is “put in it’s place” and the US has a strong position in Asia, the hated Soviet Union could be dealt with. After all, Communism must be stopped, right? The US President is starting to see the light. The US military grows.

      Meanwhile, on the other side of the world, the Japanese leaders in favor of peace are much stronger willed than we remember in our history. When the Japanese Army invaded Chinese Manchuria in 1931, all of the commanding officers involved were immediately arrested and imprisoned. The Army was called back into Korea. The War Hawks clamoring for a “strong” Japan suddenly slinked back into the holes they came from, fearing for their own freedom from prison. The new peaceful Japanese Government took further steps to punish the “impudent” military by drastically cutting military budgets. These actions earned Japan great applause in the League Of Nations and made for very good relations with China, who forgave Japan the assault on Manchuria when they saw that it was an illegal move by the military without the government’s endorsement. As further recompense and to build more unity in Asia not by sword, but through solidarity, Japan returns control of its possessions in Manchuria, and the islands of Formosa and Hainan, to the Chinese government.
        In rapid succession, the small Pacific nations of the Caroline Islands, the Marshall Islands, the Marianas, and Palau Island see the strengths of an allied Asia, and request to join the Japanese Protectorate.

      In China, since the Kuomintang did not have to deal with a Japanese invasion, they were able to concentrate on hunting down and stomping out the Communists once and for all.
        Russia, witnessing the Kuomintang’s defeat of the Chinese Communists, distrusts the Chinese government and decides it would be a good idea to have a few eyes along the Russo/Sino borders. Thus some of the far eastern divisions are stationed along Russia’s borders with China. Also, seeing the large US military presence just across the Bearing Straits, and noting the somewhat more aggressive stance of the US Government in recent months, Russia stations protection divisions in their far east lands just to be safe. While diplomacy with the US has dropped as of late, would the US dare to attack the great Soviet Union? Perhaps a preemptive strike would be in order…

      In Canada, they have also noticed the growth of the US Military machine and are aware of the negotiations between America and the Third Reich, with which they are already at war with. This has caused an increase in recruitment for Canada’s own defense. There is great worry that if the United States openly joins with the Third Reich that Canada’s own sovereignty would be threatened, never mind being able to help Britain.

      1940 –
        In step with the German invasion of Denmark and Norway, the United States has annexed Greenland without a shot fired in resistance. The US, keen to continue its expansionism and war posture, announces a Tripartite Pact with Nazi Germany and Italy. Although the US eyes the territories in its own hemisphere and the Pacific as an ideal focus for its national interests, the President and Congress promise aid to her allies, and has the ambassador deliver a notice of war to London.

      Spain, who, thanks to support from France, has recently defeated the Fascists in its civil war, and sees an opportunity to strike back at the United States and her Axis allies for its defeat 42 years prior, from which it had never fully recovered. The government of Spain announces a partnership with France, and prepares to go to war once again.

      –—CHANGES TO THE BOARD-----

      ASIA
      Siam is a strict neutral territory with a standing army of 2 Infantry.
      Formosa and Hainan belong to China.
      Philippines is a Japanese territory.
      Amur and Szechuan will have factories on them, therefore these territories are worth 2 IPCs.

      EUROPE
      Spain is a Pro-Allies neutral territory.

      LATIN AMERICA
      West Indies is a United Kingdom territory.
      Mexico and Southeast Mexico are a Pro-Allied neutral territories with a standing army of 3 Infantry each.
      Colombia borders sea zone 89.
      Venezuela and Chile are Pro-Allied neutral territories.
      Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Uruguay are Pro-Allied neutral territories with a standing army of 2 Infantry each and IPC values of 1.
      Bolivia is a Pro-Allied neutral territory with a standing army of 1 Infantry and an IPC value of 1.
      Argentina is a Pro-Axis neutral territory.
      Paraguay is a Pro-Axis neutral territory with a standing army of 1 Infantry and an IPC value of 1.
      Brazil is a strict neutral territory.

      (In simpler terms: UK gets West Indies. Mexico and almost everything else becomes pro-allied, except Brazil (strict neutral) and Argentina + Paraguay (pro-Axis). If it was neutral and didn’t have an IPC value, it is now worth 1. If the standing army isn’t marked, it’s 2 Infantry - except Mexico (3), Southeast Mexico (3), Bolivia (1), and Paraguay (1).  US still has the Panama Canal.)

      –—NATIONAL OBJECTIVES-----

      United Kingdom:

      • 5 IPCs if the United Kingdom controls Gibraltar, Egypt, India, Malaya, and Kwangtung.  Theme: Maintenance of the empire considered vital national objective.
      • 8 IPCs if the United Kingdom controls West Indies, and there are no Axis submarines in the North Atlantic (SZ 88-91, 102-112, 116-119, and 121-127. aka: Excluding the Baltic, Mediterranean, Hudson Bay, and Eastern US coast).  Theme: Access to vital wartime resources and maintaining center of influence in Latin America.
      • 5 IPCs if the Allies control Central America (Panama Canal).  Theme: Strategic advantage and trade with allies.
      • 2 IPCs if the Axis do not control any originally Pro-Allies territory in South America (Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Chile, or Uruguay).  Theme: Unified support and propaganda value as champion of freedom in Latin America.

      Commonwealth:

      • 5 IPCs if the Commonwealth controls both New South Wales (Sydney) and Toronto (Ottowa).
        / OR 5 IPCs if the Commonwealth controls both New South Wales (Sydney) and Quebec.  Theme: Centers of power.
      • 5 IPCs if the Allies control Borneo, Sumatra, Java, Celebes, and Dutch New Guinea.  Theme: Access to raw materials.
      • 5 IPCs if the Allies control Central America (Panama Canal).  Theme: Strategic advantage and trade with allies.
      • 5 IPCs if the Allies control New Guinea, New Britain, Solomon Islands, and 3 of the following territories: Guam, Wake Island, Midway, Hawaiian Islands, Johnston Island, and Line Islands.  Theme: Defense perimeter and war progress.

      Japan:
      When Japan Is Not at War with the United States:

      • 15 IPCs if Japan is not at war with the United States.  Theme: Peacetime happiness and strategic resource trade with the United States.
      • 5 IPCs if the Allies control Borneo, Sumatra, Java, Celebes, and Dutch New Guinea.  Theme: Access to raw materials.

      When Japan Is at War with the United States:

      • 5 IPCs if Japan controls at least 2 Battleships and the territory of Korea.  Theme: Global recognition of Japan as a major power.
      • 5 IPCs if Japan controls all homeland territories (Japan, Okinawa, and Iwo Jima).  Theme: National integrity.
      • 5 IPCs if Japan controls the Philippines, Marianas, Palau Island, Caroline Islands, and Marshall Islands.  Theme: Fulfilling promise as protectorate of Asia.
      • 5 IPCs if the Allies control Guam, Gilbert Islands, Fiji, and Samoa.  Theme: Expansion of influence and protectorship of Asian-Pacific nations.
      • 5 IPCs if the Allies control Borneo, Sumatra, Java, Celebes, and Dutch New Guinea.  Theme: Access to raw materials.
      • 5 IPCs if the Allies control Central America (Panama Canal).  Theme: Strategic advantage and trade with allies.

      United States:

      • 5 IPCs if the United States controls all original Pacific territories and 2 other island territories in the Pacific. (New Zealand and Japan do not count. New Guinea does.)  Theme: Maintaining national sovereignty and expansion of influence in the Pacific.
      • 10 IPCs if the United States controls all Western Hemisphere continental territories, except Brazil, but including Greenland. (Aleutian Islands and West Indies not required.)  Theme: Manifest destiny.
      • 5 IPCs if the Axis control all Dutch Pacific territories (Sumatra, Java, Celebes, Dutch New Guinea).
        / OR 8 IPCs if the Axis control all Dutch Pacific territories AND Malaya, Borneo, and New Guinea.  Theme: Access to raw materials.
      • 5 IPCs if the Axis control at least 3 original Soviet territories AND the United States has at least one land unit in an original Soviet territory.  Theme: Practical success against rival Communist ideology.
      • 5 IPCs if the United States control Japan (Tokyo).  Theme: Winning the war.
      • 5 IPCs if the United States control New South Wales (Sydney) and Ontario (Ottowa).  Theme: Winning the war.
      • 5 IPCs if the United States control Kiangsu (Shanghai).  Theme: Winning the war.
      • 5 IPCs if the United States control India (Calcutta).  Theme: Winning the war.
      • 8 IPCs (one time only) the first time the United States controls both the Philippines and West Indies.  Theme: Propaganda boost for recapturing rightful territory.

      China:
      Political Situation: China is in the final stage of ending a long civil war and routing all Communist opposition. As such, China starts with 0 IPCs.

      • 2 IPCs if the Allies control the Burma Road (Szechuan, Yunnan, Burma, and India).  Theme: Military supply line.

      France:

      • Troop bonus: When Spain joins the Allies under the control of the French player, that player immediately places his or her choice of up to 12 IPCs’ worth of any French land units on the territory Spain for free. This happens only once per game.  Theme: Mobilizing as per stated alliance.
      • Troop bonus: When the territory France is liberated or recaptured by the Allies, the player controlling France immediately places 4 Infantry on the territory France for free. This happens only once per game.  Theme: National liberation and national prestige.

      Italy:
      Italy’s second national objective is changed to read:

      • 5 IPCs if Axis powers control at least 3 of the following territories: Gibraltar, Southern France, Greece, Egypt, and Spain.  Theme: Stated national objectives - Greater Roman Empire.

      Soviet Union:
      Soviet Union’s first national objective is changed to read:

      • 5 IPCs if the convoy in sea zone 125 is free of Axis warships, and Archangel is controled by the Soviet Union, and there are no units belonging to other Allied powers present in any territories originally controlled by the Soviet Union.  Theme: National morale and access to Allied material.

      Soviet Union gains these additional national objectives:

      • 5 IPCs if the Soviet Union controls Alaska AND if the Allies control Aleutian Islands.  Theme: Strategic interest and practical success against rival ideology.
      • 2 IPCs any time the Soviet Union liberates an occupied Allied (non-Soviet) territory.  Theme: Propaganda value and spread of communism.
      posted in House Rules
      EnoughSaidE
      EnoughSaid
    • RE: The US as an aggresive Axis power, Japan as a peaceful Allied power.

      First off, a minor complaint: I love this idea so much, I found it rather difficult to focus on my work duties last Friday. But seriously, thank you for coming up with an awesome idea and laying the groundwork for it!

      After a good weekend of thinking (but not playtesting), I came up with several thoughts. Your original scenario seems grossly imbalanced, but that can be fixed. I particularly liked wittman’s idea to heat up South America. So, a shout-out also to CWO Marc for doing that research!

      I don’t mean to step on anyone’s toes, here. I just like this so much, I’m taking the ball and running with it!

      I’ll post the sheet I’ve been working on in a minute. If anyone has any questions like “Why did you choose ___,” or even “So does this mean ___,” I’d be happy to answer them! I also encourage any you to post any thoughts, critiques, or pointing out errors. Thanks!

      posted in House Rules
      EnoughSaidE
      EnoughSaid
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 4 / 4