yea its pro-allies my bad.

Posts made by Endeer
-
RE: Europe only IPC sheet
almost positive that every one fits on the europe game, I believe that the grid goes to 72 and USA(highest income) is 65 in AA 1940 europe…
-
RE: Neutral Territories.
Would it not be profitable for the italian forces to attack greece. bonus income and the national objective too.
-
RE: Sea Lion…If and When Poll
I think its stupid as well, brings uneven balance to the game. At least the Europe game.
-
RE: America landing strat.
(It gives) the italians and germans another turn to ready.
-
RE: America landing strat.
But if america has to land troops to take it and if give the germans and italians an extra turn to ready themselves.
-
RE: Sea Lion…If and When Poll
My bad. This was a AA 1940 europe game which in my opinion is very one sided.
-
RE: America landing strat.
That also in my opinion should make gibralter a huge axis target. as italy it would be one of the few think they could contribute to the axis cause.
-
America landing strat.
I played a game of AA europe 1940 last week, with america i noticed if Gibraltar is held by the english, than american can move fleet to neighboring sea zone and be with range of up to 5 different landing zones. This is what lead to an allied victory because germany and italy could not defend the five different zones and have a substantial enough force to repel the invasion.
-
RE: Sea Lion…If and When Poll
in one off my games, i was playing uk, russia and france, germany took france on turn 1, than on turn two took UK because of good rolls. however even with this excellent start, russia had rounded up enough force to roll into berlin on turn 6 because of american pressure in holland. this leads me to think that sealion is not a good idea till after russians are dealt with.