Topics created by El Stef

Hello,

It was just one thought. For the moment no suggestion for a house rule. I will only suggest such a thing if it improves the balance (All the fronts are linked!) and gives the game more historical feeling. 
I wil only tinker with the game after much consideration and playtesting.

A good game ( and A&A14 is that  ) is :

playable ( clear and sturdy rules)
has the right historical feel: you are faced (broadly) with the dillema’s of the combatants,  but it gives you options. However always within the technological constraints and strategic possibilities of the time.

Considering:
Belgium & Switzerland
economic warfare (unrestricted submarine warfare is not good at the moment)
minefields:  rule is Ok but can be clearer. ( example;  bridging or ferrying in mined waters)
limited production in India and Ruhr
war weariness

( “mines” can also mean;  coastal defences, frogmen, and small torbedoboats.  See the fate of the Viribus unitis and the Szent istvan)
Greetings
El Stef

I think attacking a strict neutral may become a late game move in which the other tt on the board are worthless to the outcome of a game that may end in 3-4 turns.

@Krieghund:

@P@nther:

@Krieghund:

Since Jet Fighters increases fighters’ attack values to equal their defense values in normal combat, I’d say it would do the same in SBRs, allowing attacking fighters to roll on a 2. However, Larry will need to confirm that.

But this is still not confirmed by Larry as I think. Or is it?

Yes, it’s just been confirmed.  It will be in the next version of the FAQ (soon, I hope).

Great, thank you :-)