@TG:
A little off topic, but has anyone come to a initial conclusion about balance in the 1941/1942 Scenarios?
I’d like to introduce a few friends to A&A and would like the starting game to be equal to both sides as possible.
I’m guessing:
1941 + NO: Axis way too powerful?
1941 - NO: ??1942 + NO: Balanced?
1942 - No: Allies too powerful?
I’ll stir the discussion…
1941+NO: Allies way too powerful when they go full out KGF. And with full I mean FULL. Japan gets big and cashes 65+ IPC by turn 4/5 but by then there is a large Russian/UK stack in Poland keeping Germany in Berlin, cashing a 20 IPC a turn.
However if you don’t do KGF, axis are too powerful indeed.
I know it sucks, but the KGF is even more scripted than in AAR since there is not KJF in this game. If performed well Japan won’t reach Moscow ever before Berlin collapses. I dunno how it turns out if Japan doesn’t advance on the mainland but goes to the USA. However I’ve still have to see a succesfull invasion of LA in this game. It’s so easy for the USA to counter and Japan keeps on having the logistic difficulties to tranny to LA.
I hope I am wroing, but the way I see it, the Allies will eventually go full KGF in the top rated games (yet again).
1941-NO: Well, Allies unbeatable if they go KGF. But if you play something else you might end up with a balanced game, but who do that if you know you can win with going full blown KGF…
1942 I can’t judge, we are not that interested in that scenario yet since 1941 is more attractive cuz it’s new. :wink: