Posts made by DessertFox599

Whether the cps are going for Russia or France, they should take out the British navy. I would say for at least the first turn, you just build ships as germany gets alot of troops. I have never tried the Schliefen plan. I have always gone full Russia. I guess this is the ww1 version of sealion. I would think the Austrians have to focus on northern Italy and try to get to France as soon as possible. The German Navy must take out the British navy and keep building to distract GB, but also lots of men as well. But I don’t know. I am interested to see what people are going to say.

Maybe it’s just me but I find the game to be well balanced. It might be the players I play with, but I find most of my games 50 50

This is the most axis and alies game to date. I find even with capable players a 50 50 chance of victory if we play with tr.

Central powers stat.

Take out the royal navel first. Use subs in Atlantic to take out canadian fleet Germany should build 3bb 1st turn. Cp go straight for Russia. Put enough troops in border territories between enemy powers to bog down allies. After Russia falls, head straight for France. By that time even with America, Germany will be too powerful.

Allies

Take out the Ottos. France and britian go as offensive as possible if you see germ going for Russia. Help out Italy as much as you can. If it’s all out France, go defensive obviously in territories with germ. But with the rest, go offensive. Never go defensive too long. Make germ go defensive as soon as possible.

That’s my two cents.

What’s wrong with the PTR rules? Their great. In fact I don’t play with the OOB rules. The game gets too long.

Guys the biggest problem with the map isn’t Europe but the US. Compare the us in Europe to the us in the pacific.  The pacific is too high!!!

Our group is trying to come up with rules similar to yours with the spy thing. However we are thinking about having actual units on the board. Also i was thinking of a new phase called the ‘‘political phase’’. Basically it will allow players to disrupt capitals, cause revolutions in enemy-controlled territories, and even cause some neutral powers to join your side. That’s my two cents anyway.

Hey i’m homeschooled!

Can you show in the rules where that is?

What I meant was that the allies would build two minor factories, one in Norway, and the other in Finland. I thought increased factory production meant that you could build five units in a minor factory. I am sorry for the misunderstanding.

Are you going to mention the Norway strategy. For new players, its where the us takes Norway and Finland, builds a minor factory in both places, and gets increased factory production. That way, the us can place down 10 units in the Norway region. Also what is your guys opinion on this plan? BTW, great video.

I have a few in mind, ( especially for th cps) but I would like to hear from you guys.

P.S The tournament rules are in effect.

What are your guy’s opinions on the best purchases for all the nations?

That’s what I thought.

Does the rules say that you need infantry to conquer a territory? For example, say there is an artillery in Prussia, and wants to occupy Poland. Can Germany do that or does he need an infantry?

You realize that with those rules, you would actually make it easier for japan to conquer china

The only reason why that rule exist is because of the Chinese civil war……but both sides made peace so that they both could focus on Japan.  So why does that rule exist again?

I do love combat evolved. I don’t really have a favorite tank but the one i play most often are the kv-1 and t-34.

Does anybody play wot of tanks? If so, whats you favorite tank?

The Russians actually had a similar 85mm gun that they sometimes used like the flak 88.

I say we should  have an artillery for defense. Like a unit that can pair with an infantry or artillery that give them a +1 on defense.