I like the way Stalin and Hitler handled crime. Some guy commits a crime, and he is caught. Then the Gestapo or the KGB say “Get into the ditch. Lie down and don’t scream when the gun goes off.” Crime rates go down when all the criminals are dead. Good people will be alive and as long as food and water are in good supply everything is good. Screw court precedings for a criminal caught red handed. Now, if it was questionable about whether or not the person is guilty, then a fair trial would be ordered. This is my last post in this topic so any more attacks on my political beliefs are futile.
Posts made by Desertfox
-
RE: Political Idealogyposted in General Discussion
-
RE: Political Idealogyposted in General Discussion
@Deviant:Scripter:
Well, I hate to break it to everyone, but the drug trade into this country takes a backseat to many other things. To prove this you need look no further than Afganhistan…where local warlords are being paid off, and the US military explicity allows the opium trade to flourish.
Is opium illegal in Afganistan? If it is not then the US should not try to stop it. US laws do not apply to non-US citizens living in a foreign country.
-
RE: Political Idealogyposted in General Discussion
I got 3,000 per guy per year. This at a rate of 1 hundred new criminals each year comes out to about 20,000 criminals at any one time. That comes to $60,000,000 per year.
-
RE: Political Idealogyposted in General Discussion
I am morally ok with someone being killed for their crimes and I am just showing how economical it is. Also, why punish an addict? It is a waste of time. Just get rid of the dealers. Problem solved. Also, look at the way companies in America generally handle health care, that is what I mean. Another thing is that conclusive evidence will be required. The Jury must approve any capital punishment by 3/4 vote. After a person is sentenced to death, they are given a last meal, taken to a police firing range, sat in a chair, blindfolded, and killed by firing squad. Quick death. Then their remains are given to family or if there is no family or friends that are incinerated and their ashes are scattered near some tree.
-
RE: Political Idealogyposted in General Discussion
The government has to pay to keep someone in jail. Cost for a 2 bullets and a blank, a black hanky, and a last meal (supposing you can just use standard police force rifles) = $30. As apposed to 6 dollars per day times 20 years. That comes out to 43,800. Also, I estimated it on the low side. It is probably any where from 50,000-70,000. Just think of all the money saved! And if you do this for 100 criminals the numbers are 30,000 compared to 5,000,000-7,000,000.
Secondly, a company would only pay for the insurance for dependents of a worker until the dependent reaches the age of 18 unless they are married to the worker, in which case they are always covered except if they receive insurance from another source.
-
RE: Political Idealogyposted in General Discussion
I am
Economic Left/Right: 2.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 4.00 -
RE: Political Idealogyposted in General Discussion
I am against abortions because a baby has never done anything wrong. However, the death penalty is good because it is cheaper than feeding someone for 20+ years.
-
RE: Political Idealogyposted in General Discussion
My beliefs in full
1. Small national government, responsible for protection, diplomacy, and making national laws.
2. Pro-life, there are places called adoption agencies.
3. Health care should be taken care of by the employer. When you begin a full time job and have it for ten years, the company should be required to pay for health care for the rest of your life and for all dependents.
4. Have a three month unemployment program for physically and mentally fit people. If they can’t find a job, apparently they aren’t trying hard enough.
5. The mentally and physically unfit can go to charities for money. The government should not force, but rather encourage the giving of donations.
6. Local matters should be handled on a local level.
7. Stupid people shouldn’t be allowed to vote. The should be a simple test requiring the person to write all the states and their capitals. (Spelling doesn’t count.) This test only needs to be taken one time when you register to vote.
8. No solitary confinement. Also, their is nothing wrong with capital punishment if it is approved by the jury.
9. Gay marriage is wrong. However, homosexually may be done with in the confines of ones home.
10. Polution is bad.
11. If someone breaks a treaty, they should have there butt kicked. -
RE: YIPEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!posted in General Discussion
@Guerrilla:
You have probably entered this thread wondering about the title… Well it is what it is meant to mean. YIPEEEE! My Mom has Finally agreed for my brother and I to Buy AaA (we are getting revised)! Thanks Mom! After 3 years of knowing about it I’m getting it!
Why couldn’t you buy it before?
-
Political Idealogyposted in General Discussion
Please state your idealogy and why you believe in that political idealogy.
I am a Rightist (Republican) because I am conservative. If I earn money, I want to keep as much as possible.
-
RE: Survey for May 2004posted in Axis & Allies Classic
I am normally Germany so I do not like any invasions of Germany. However, the smartest thing the allies can do is to land on Finland-Norway and go from there through Ruskie territory.
Most Important Pieces
Russia-INF
Germany-Armour
United Kingdom-Bombers and Ships
Japan-Fighters and Aircraft Carriers
United States-Transports and Aircraft. -
RE: Reletivism: Do you believe?posted in General Discussion
Think that there is one right opinion, but others can have a wrong opinion. However, it is a good thing that some people have the wrong opinion because it gives everyone else something to laugh at. There is a god. All you Atheists are wrong. HEHEHEHE! :lol: See my example?
-
RE: Gay Marriagesposted in General Discussion
If they called the union between two Homosexuals something other than marrige, I would be a lot happier.
-
RE: WW1: Whos to Blame?posted in General Discussion
Did you not watch the News. THEY FOUND ILLEGIAL WEAPON DUMPS!!! Even though they weren’t WMDs.
-
RE: Has anyone played with the 3/3 tanks from the new AH editionposted in House Rules
Personally, I kind of think they had right the first time. Tanks are offensive weapons and it makes sense that they would have higher attack than defense. Also, infantry in a trench or some kind of defensive position would be more effective than an attacking infantry.
-
RE: A&A Generalsposted in House Rules
This is what I have come up with:
Rommel allows all panzer and infantry divisions in the same province to travel +1 and two divisions gain +1 attack.
Zhukov gains one free infantry division each turn in the province he is in.Montgomery’s troops gain +1 defense and two or less tank divisions gain +1 attack.
Patton’s advantage is that three or less land units a battle gain +1 attack.
Yamamoto’s fleet can move +1 and airplanes on carries in his fleet can go on kamikaze missions with +1 attack. (In a kamikaze mission, the plane can go its full range and is lost after attacking.)
A general is dead if his unit is killed.
-
RE: Gay Marriagesposted in General Discussion
It is just sick and wrong. :evil: I am a repulican!!! :P :D