so, obama with the beatdown.
obama is now sligtly ahead after dominating south carolina. he might became to use taht to give himself a slight advantage for super tuesday. it really is anyone’s race for either primary. (assuming Rudy doesn’t lose in florida) anyone ever told him not to put all your eggs in one basket. I still hate all the nominees though.
@ncscswitch:
Jen, if you do not realize what effect 1 in 100 mortgages being in foreclosure means, then I have not the time, desire, nor the space on this site to attempt to educate you on the detriment to the US Economy from such a statistic…
1% of 300 million is 3 million. I’m not sure how many mortgages there are but since % of our population is 3 million people my guess is that 1% of our homes are over 1 million. and its absurd to say that over 1 million houses foreclosed isn’t bad.
More important practically: Russia forgets about moving the sub (yes, to sz2 with UK btl tra) say in 5-10% of games.
- What are best German exploits ?
- What are best Allied ways to mend ?
I’ve only done that once in my life before. and unfortantually it was during the two on two tourney. The best thing germany could do is attack the UK fleet round 1.
petrograd was not called petrograd until world war one. It was still st. petersburg. and Napoleon never tried to take petrograd but aimed for moscow. There is a quote by napoleon( having trouble refinding the source even though i just saw it today) that goes something like this. I’ll take russia by the feet if i take kiev, if st. petersburg then the head and if moscow then the heart. So napoleon had really 3 goals he good of aim for and he amied for moscow. you want to represent this in your game so you could take either of the 3 cities.
@Cmdr:
Is it good strategy in ADS to send 1 infantry, 2 fighters after 3 defending infantry to “strafe”? No. Why? Because in ADS there’s a chance the defender will get three hits. In LL, he cannot possibly score more then 1 hit, period, and he’s guaranteed that one hit. So it’s a BAD strategy, but it works in LL.
that is still a bad strategy. it is just trading an inf for and inf in which the plans would probably be better spent. you would have to send atleast an extra artillery.
@stuka:
To me, it is of most importance that our nation at war should be what we should be voting about.
I was trying my best not jump into this rather sensitive thread… but I have to say I absolutely agree.
I think it’s really sad to see the (voting) pubic become complacant with this war just continuing apparently “off in the background”. The whole situation just lends itself to no one coming up with a plan or conditions for withdrawal, ever.
And now just days ago McCain is quoted as saying we’ll be in Iraq “maybe 100 years”. Those words should be the death knoll for any perspective candidate. And yet amazingly… apparently they aren’t.
Perhaps to many the '08 elections are nothing more than a glorified version of American Idol. They no longer even begin to realize what’s at stake: the uncertain future of a nation at war. ~ZP
After Bush leaves the war will be ended by 2010. that is just the sad reality. hopefully we will be able to stablize it enough so iraq can prosper under freedom and be an american ally. I thinlk the economy should be the most important issue right now. it just seems that all the democrats want to socialize us while the republicans want to form a state run by a few corporations and monopilies. thats why I just don’t like any of the canidates.
I was shocked that Huckabee won Iowa. I didn’t expect he’d get any wins. I thought seperation between church and state was important to voters. well romney is now ahead of huckabee now.
i don’t think you can have this kind of talk with out it turnning political as it is a political race.
as for your (dezrtfish) edit of Jen’s statment above, i think she was meaning that it’s amazing that she got 3rd and not higher with all the media around her and the Clinton publicity machine behind her. i’m not saying my political view on this, just that it’s strange that she fell to 3rd and not 2nd at lowest… expetally with her being the Dem fav.I gota say I would have loved to discuss a “caucus” with someone who has been to one, especialy a Democratic one.
if any thing this seams to me to be more political then Jen’s statment as you brought a perticular party up. is it because you would want to go to the Dem Caucus because you support the Dems or because you would get a good laugh out of it. ether interpritation would be political.
why does it matter? no one is going to die pervavita. the only reason political discussion was band was because it got out of hand and degenerated into name calling. We should be creatures of reason not of law. (bad things happen when people care more about what the law is than what is right) If we don’t degrade to insulting each other then this discussion should be fine. This is just my opinion though.
if you have excess money to buy navy with russia i’d rather spend it on fighters and then use the one sub as sort of a fodder pieace. that way once your navy objective has been covered you can switch to land easily and i think fighters are great.
yeah I’m back from my vaction now. and want to start it this weekend. is everyone still game? and do any new players want to play?
i second that. I think its a good idea and its only one topic and is sorta important.
@Guerrilla:
I said Borderliine!
no ones talkin about deporting any one. we don’t have to bring it to that level. I’ll cut your grass for ya if you forget about this conversation. lol :lol: just kidding
…… oops wrong border. forget what i said :wink: :lol:
@Cmdr:
That’s what my avatar used to be, for the new guys who don’t know.
I like the bigger picture…found it on the yahoo :wink:
If you are Russian, then you must be really good in playing the allies, even against a 9 bid axis 8-)There have been numerous attempts in invading and occupying Russia, none of the attempts have succeeded.
Napoleon came really close, but he couldn’t hold it long enough, only a month or so.
actualy he captured moscow and left because staying their would only waste resources.
@Cmdr:
@AJ:
I guess your avatar just explains about how you’re a terrorist?
Are you serious? I found it on the uncyclopedia.
If my avatar can make someone a terrorist then there’s a lot of terrorists in world.Can u explain how an avatar can make sommeone a terrorist?
**Well, it’s kinda funny. I mean, America has the most allies of any nation in the world
Pictures that are hysterical because their so wrong, do not.**
if that was a picture it would be hysterical :wink:
@Imperious:
The girl is totally gorgeous even though i cant believe she is actually Indian…
not really to either part of the sentence.
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=6226.0 wonder why it was sticked :wink:
that fighter dead can screw up the battle for the med.
@Cmdr:
0 = true
1 = false:P
oops maybe i was high when i was listening to my computer applications class. thats the easiest class ever. i read the chapter for my history quizes in that class.
0 = off and 1 equals on. thats all i know sorry