Posts made by cyan

J1 this helps for a sea lion game and also if japan whats to be apart of africa so germany can dash to moscow
1ic to east indies
1ic To indochina

@M36:

Well actually Nixon had alot of potential, and he could have been a great president, but the whole watergate thing hurt him just a tad.

no even without watergate. i still don’t like him.

@M36:

Eisenhower? My God what are you smoking Jen?

Teddy? Well he screwed other countries up, especially Spain, but wrong again!

W? Everybody knows W kicks a**, and its the dumbasses in Congress who have screwed things up.

Jesus Jen, get with the picture!

i think she is smoking look at the chart. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_United_States_Presidents most of her picks are dems that should very high on the list.  only sr., w and nixon belong pn that list all the others did a good job as leaderes. really good leaders. if kennedy lived longer he probablly would be the greatest president ever instead of just a great president.

@M36:

Just think if you spent your time finding an alternative fuel source…

Buffalo power! imagine how fast your car could be towed if buffalo’s with Buffalo sauce in there eyes were being buffaloed by other Buffalos.  :-D

@Jennifer:

William Cook?  Or did I miscount?

got that too.

@frimmel:

@cyan:

“the customer is always right” - no clue who said it

I have to disagree. Sometimes they are trying to steal from you.

okay then
“there i s no such thing as stealing; there’s only exchanging items for a bullet in one’s head” “the customer is always right” “therefore if he wants the bullet give it to him”

I rejet your constitution and substitute my own - republican ideology  :lol: ( myth buster)

“the customer is always right” - no clue who said it

@ncscswitch:

Gave up earthquakes for thunderstorms and hurricanes eh?

the origin of of offtopicness. pretty sad it was the second reply.

or sorry i meant real life i think there in a muesum or something.

Russian Battleships - they exist.

thats funny :lol: i think they still have 2 or something.

@newpaintbrush:

da bears!

i think you’ll like these bears more than the raven gently raping, nevermore. :lol:

@cyan:

@Bashir:

And I mean 9 other inf in eur… not 5 tanks and save 2 ipcs…

@ Switch lets drop the whole AS thing… He is not worth it making this much trouble over it…

well i’m going doing the opposite of what you said. 3 tanks,1inf to e. europe, 1 tank to germany and 2inf to libya 4tanks and 2 inf =20+9ipc the last ipc goes to germany.

well, doesn’t matter  what you think was a good bid because i took moscow(and its hear to stay :-D) on Ger 2 just fine with my bid.

@ncscswitch:

In a Pearl Ultra-Light

if you want to go ultra, ultra light you can send 1 fig and 1 sub and let the fig die first.(only the American fig is left usually .)  this only works in classic though. never tried it in revised to go ultra, ultra light.

@U-505:

@ncscswitch:

I think we need to revise the existing structure of units a bit to incorporate a few that were missing…

0-99          INF
100-250      ART
250-500      AA
500-1000    ARM
1000-1500  TRN
1500-2000  SUB
2000-3000  DST
3000-5000  AC
5000-10000 BB
10000+      HB

By adding in AA and TRN, and by tweeking the scales, we cover all the way to 10,000 posts

Switch, you forgot fighter in your list. And while we are on the subject. Heavy bomber is a tech. Since you are including techs, why not add rockets, super subs, and jet fighters? That could cover you to about 20k or 30k posts.

just put subs where transports are and then replace teh trn with a fig. but wait until i reach 499 posts to do this :-D

“Fear not: for God is come to prove you, and that his fear may be before your faces, that ye sin not.” -Moses 20:20 (KJV) mosses said this but you can apply it to all types of fear

America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves. ~ President Abraham Lincoln

“In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner of later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy……Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.” (I.7) george Orwell 1984

A means can be justified only by its end. But the end in its turn needs to be justified.- Leon Trotsky

“Speed is the essence of war. Take advantage of the enemy’s unpreparedness; travel by unexpected routes and strike him where he has taken no precautions.”-sun tzu

“When one wants, one can.”- sweddish proverb but i replaced the must with wants.

here’s my axis and allies ones
Russia: germany can’t take moscow if your march to france.
germany: let the english have the sea you can take the land
UK: something was in your tea if choose this country.
Japan: moscow should not fear the germans but you  for your tanks will turn everthing it touches orange.
USA: commit yourself to either japan or germany but never africa.

also USA:(today)bush should listen to sherman,http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/William_T._Sherman

it helps alot when germany or japan is reduced to a few terrories with stakcs in their capitals.

@Cobert:

@cyan:

other option waas without the bid because you said no bid before the longer 2trn,2tanks and 1 art bid was for without a bid. 2x8+2x5+4+30. the 2trn, 1ic was for with the bid. 16+15=31

I see I see.

I still like to build 3 transports or 2 and a sub (depends on kwangtung transport), since I like having 4 in the water by turn 2.

misssed m point, why do you need a sub  J1?

@Cobert:

@cyan:

why the sub why not 2 transports and ic if you have a 1ipc bid if not then 2tanks and 1 artillery you have 8inf in the immediate vicinity of japan that can transport in 1 turn. only 2 other unites other tan inf. that balances it out more i try to complament my tanks with inf not the other way around when it comes to transports…

We dont play with a bid though, so that lucky 1 IPC bid isnt available.

other option waas without the bid because you said no bid before the longer 2trn,2tanks and 1 art bid was for without a bid. 2x8+2x5+4+30. the 2trn, 1ic was for with the bid. 16+15=31

why the sub why not 2 transports and ic if you have a 1ipc bid if not then 2tanks and 1 artillery you have 8inf in the immediate vicinity of japan that can transport in 1 turn. only 2 other unites other tan inf. that balances it out more i try to complament my tanks with inf not the other way around when it comes to transports…