I think everyone is suggesting too many changes. A thread should be made in house rules to argue about one or two changes that aren’t drastic that would improve or at least change gameplay.
I like the order of Ger/Rus/Jap/Uk/It/Us. Germany gets to attack russians first, Japan gets to attack allies first. Its sets up great for a mid-1941 start.
Hey I’m not here to insult anybody, im just serving as a lightning rod for the rest of the community to attack.
@JWW:
http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u1/robertmoeller/GOOFTURD-1.jpg (recent, candid like whooooah)
http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u1/robertmoeller/YEAAAAH.jpg (left edge of picture)
I should probably wash that hoodie sometime.DUDE, you are one ugly mother fcker. DON’T EVER DO THAT AGAIN! :-o :-o :-o :-o
And yes, unless you are a Tennessean, and you might need to be to get laid, you need to wash your clothes. All of them. Not just the hoodie but that is a good start.
FYI….Once you pop your cherry. And it is obvious you haven’t by that stupid look on your face, Marxism makes less sense. Go to Tennessee. Get some goat arse with the other Tennesseans and wake up.
BTW…what were you thinking posting your picture? Taking direction from me? Now nobody will take any of your arguments seriously.
LOL NO IM FROM PITTSBURGH
Whats all this tennessee rambling about?
Nobody takes anyone elses arguments seriously anyways on here, thats why this thread was made, so we can take them not seriously and not get banned.
@JWW:
WHAT’S WRONG WITH ALL CAPS? PLEASE DON’T START CRYING NOW!
Hahaha, its just kind of obnoxious.
IF IT SOUNDS LIKE A DUCK AND SMELLS LIKE A DUCK, ITS A DUCK, YOU LEFTIST COMMIE BASTARD! :-D
Wait no thats my argument!
You get one applaud for using a word I am not familiar with. NOW PUT THE DICTIONARY DOWN AND TAKE YOUR HEAD OUT OF J-FOOTS ARSE AND TRY TO MAKE SOME SENSE.
It means ‘in a disparaging manner’. k here comes some sense.
Since we agree on this I must take some time to contemplate my stance on the matter.
Good call.
IS THERE A POINT HERE?
That post kind of made it sound like saying intolerant things wasnt considered free speech.
God damn it I am beginning to like you humbert. This is right on and makes PERFECT sense. Believing absolutely in Atheism is exactly the same as the religious nutz out there saying their religious beliefs are the ONLY true religion. No one knows either way. I apologize for all of my rants. No more caps. Hope I didn’t upset you too much.
All good calls.
You can lead us all. Let’s see the guy who came up with pejoratively
.
http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u1/robertmoeller/GOOFTURD-1.jpg (recent, candid like whooooah)
http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u1/robertmoeller/YEAAAAH.jpg (left edge of picture)
I should probably wash that hoodie sometime.
Yes my brother, I’m with you. Post some Marx’s for us to read. I’d like to see B-Loaf & Jenn’s head explode! :-D
Better:
http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/kropotkin/conquest/ch1.html
I think I know what this is without clicking.
Brad Neely is funny.
(was I right?)
Most of the political discussion in this forum has been silly and kind of narrow minded. Even if you disagree, there really never was a reason to type in all caps or make personal attacks or act elitist.
Additionally, I strongly advocate anarcho-communism. Jermofoot is hardly a communist, he just has some left wing ideas.
Even though I just called myself an anarcho-communist and used the term left wing, I hate political labels. We really need to stop using conservative and liberal, theyve lost their meanings and are all being used pejoratively and are just throwing a wide range of political beliefs into 7-12 letters.
Yes prostitution should be legalized. Theres probably a ton of things that are illegal that shouldnt be, including drugs.
Why is it when a left winger speaks his mind it is “free speech” but when a right winger speaks his mind it is bigotry and intolerance?
Bigotry and intolerance are still free speech. However, having the right to say something bigoted doesnt make it any less racist/sexist. I mean, you should still be allowed to say it, you should be allowed to scream it from rooftops, but it might not change the fact that whatever youre saying is intolerant.
And on religion: Im a highly skeptical agnostic. I wont say atheist beacuse thats just as much of a dogma as blindly following religion. I say highly skeptical because i really doubt in the existence of a god, especially the institutions put in place now with modern religions, but you just cant rule out the existence of some sort of force that set the universe in motion.
I dont know or care if jens old picture was her. While were on the subject, everybody post pictures of yourself, i want to see who im talking to.
This thread needs to stay open so we cant b**** about each other and not get banned because of rules in this forum that treats us like we’re in kindergarten.
The liberals are just voting for hilary because they think shell be Bill again and all liberals loved him. Its not like if the general election is Obama / McCain they will jump on mccain.
@Cmdr:
And a war zone is any zone designated as such by the United States Military. If you are under the threat of physical violence by an enemy army, and the threat is realistic, then it’s a war zone. Korea and the United States do NOT have a peace treaty. Cuba’s been itching to storm GITMO.
Iraq is by and large pacified. There’s some pocket resistance here and there, but over all, Al Queda’s been kicked out, the Iranians are having a much harder time getting illegal weapons into the country because of the increased border security (Hey, McCain, look you CAN secure a border!).
Youre almost making it sound like Iraq is more peaceful than Korea.
As for a PLAUSIBLE situation where nukes are needed - that’s a very stupid request. No matter what realitic, plausible situation anyone would raise, you’d easily say was ridiculous because you cannot imagine a plausible situation. Thus, all plausible situations TO YOU would be ridiculous.
Please dont act like you know me and how I think.
@ncscswitch:
I have to be honest… I think Obama is going to win Pennsylvania. Philadelphia and Pittsburgh control the state. All of the other areas combined cannot counter those two massive population centers (Pittsburgh and the rest of the Commonwealth can barely counter metro Philly, which is why PA leans solidly liberal despite the huge conservative ares of the 814 area code).
I forget who said it, but - “Pennsylvania is Pittsburgh and Philadelphia with Alabama in the middle”.
@Cmdr:
What was that line again?
“I stand 40 yards away from someone who is trained to kill me.” Or something like that in A Few Good Men out of the Mouth of Jack Nicholson?
Yea. It’s a war zone. If you cannot bring your wife and children to your duty station because it’s hostile, then it’s a warzone.
I believe for something to be a ‘warzone’ there needs to be actual conflict, not just the distant threat of one.
Also, on the German revolutionary units: Im sure if you looked hard enough youll find somebody in the United States that thinks it was wrong for us to break away from Great Britain and wants us to go back. Every country has its crazies.
Anyway, I’m done with Smacktard. Shoot, anyone who sees himself as a smacktard really shouldn’t be taken seriously enough to argue with. Especially when they’re trolling and driving the topic on a tangent.
oooh, a little personal there.
The real issue is, can we trust Obama to use nuclear weapons to defend this nation or not? If he won’t even man up enough to absorb some good honest ribbing about his ears or even to answer some straight forward questions about his past, can we really expect him to do his duty?
Explain a plausible scenario (with specifics) where the president will need nuclear weapons in the near future. Nukes are touchy subjects, its all very situational. Even in extreme situations I would be hesitant to use them.
The other issue is, last time the Clintons were in the white house, the national guards went on strike. (Washington State and Montana.) Considering most of the forces deployed in Iraq (at least while I was there) were rent-a-soldiers (national guard) can we trust them to do their duty under the Clintons, or will they go AWOL like the last time we had the Clintons in the White House?
I wouldnt associate Bills weakness in situations from 10-15 years ago with anything that might be applicable today because it is a person with the same last name in office.
Finally, can we trust McCain to nominate the right judges so as to over turn some of the bench legislation that’s been rammed down our throats unconstitutionally - to secure our borders with NO PROSPECT WHATSOEVER of an amnesty - to push for the tax cuts he REFUSED TO SIGN TWICE - to protect our civil liberties (which he has actively worked to repeal at every turn he gets) and to protect American business from eco-terrorists and the Useless Nations?
I could be wrong, but I believe he didnt sign the tax cuts because they were not accompanied by cuts in spending, which is a logical reason to not cut taxes.
After all, we have three liberals running for the White House:
Obama - Ultra Liberal and very secretive about his past and his affiliations
Clinton - Not as Ultra Liberal, but still VERY liberal.
McCain - The most liberal republican on the face of God’s green Earth. (AKA, Moderate-Liberal.)
If Obama is ultra liberal, what are kucinich and gravel?
@Cmdr:
And the SDF is NOT a military. It is a department of their law enforcement. Just because they have fighters and bombers and tanks does NOT mean it is a standing military. Under their constitution they are not PERMITTED to have a military. Thus, they have the worlds BEST police department.
A police department serving in a foreign country? That sounds an awful lot like a military to me. No matter how much everyone calls a duck a swan, it doesnt make it any less of a duck.
And, for the record, the United States President CAN push legislation. And thus, it IS important to know the heritage and culture and political affinities of those running for United States President precisely because they CAN push legislation through Congress and the House. All they need is a single patsy and they can write any bill or law they want too.
How do you think No Child Left Behind came into being? How do you think the Department of Homeland Security came into being? How do you think the Transit Security Administration came into being? Hell, how do you think NAFTA happened? Some president wrote the bill, found a moron to sponsor it and them pushed it through congress with an iron rod.
True.
Maybe you need to go back and take a civics class? I mean, I assume, of course, you actually DID take one at some point in your life…or were you one of the kids that were not “left behind” and socially promoted in public high screwl?
I dont even think my high school has civics. At least one should be required, up there with mathematics.
Not even knowing that Korea is a war zone that we’ve been in for at least 10 times as long as Iraq and that the President invaded long before Congress approved of it. Not even knowing that there were German resistance cells in Germany after World War II and some even exist to this day. Not even knowing that Gitmo was CONQUERED and STOLEN from the Spanish and Cuba and we’ve been an occupying force for almost a century at least, maybe longer.
I think he knows that Korea was a warzone and that we conquered Guantanamo Bay, its just that calling them warzones now is a bit silly. We are indeed occupying them, and there was indeed conflict there at some point, and they may very well be dubbed and labeled as ‘warzones’, but again: no matter how much everyone calls a duck a swan, it doesnt make it any less of a duck.
No one is saying they CANT say it. the point is, using barac’s middle name is a clear appeal to bigotry.
This pretty much sums up what i have to say.
Dude, if you are going to get worked up over something this minuscule you will have quite the hard long slog! There are perhaps, a trillion more important political, cultural, educational etc……issues to work towards positive change. This is simply a 3rd grade playground issue where the big stupid bully is calling a smaller kid names. The majority of the playground children understands who the arse is in this situation
hes not upset about the names, hes upset about shallow ideas based off of something like name or skin color. Most Americans need to grow up and not make assumptions about a persons ability to lead the country based off of their name and skin color. The issue of Obama’s middle name isnt as one dimensional and stupid as it seems, it ties into the far larger issue of racism.
I actually agree with him: if somebody is going to base their opinion of Obama off of his middle name, then that person is a prejudiced idiot that should stay home on election day.
No, I was agreeing with your 1/1 carrier and the other statement was in response to something different, I was just too lazy to quote the person talking about the cover.
If someone were to remove the intro credits thing this would easily become the next rickroll or fresh prince.
carrier should be a 1/1/$14/1 hit. they sucked in battle, there strenght was and is not in it’s guns (how few it has) but in it’s air power.
This.
I believe that cover could be real, I would think that for an anniversary edition they would try to make it look more like the old game.
Old joke. So old that it pisses me off when people honestly think theyre witty by tricking someone into clicking the link.
How exactly did you fall for it?
Poll made me LOL.
Why should the carrier defend better than it attacks?
I believe so, but im not big on rules. As long as they have a definite place to land at the end of a turn, they are allowed into combat. So I see a built carrier as a place to land, so Ill go with yes, they could land there.